Hitmanager

HIT

Please explain why this is "a better version to be". I've pressed my claim on the talk pages of both the HIT article and 马兴毅's one. Your version, which is exactly the same as the user's above, contains clumsy and grammatical problems with irrelevant information.Biomedicinal (contact) 15:47, 7 January 2014‎ (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Harbin Institute of Technology.

Please press your claim on the talk page first.

Biomedicinal (contact) 07:25, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. You must enter the discussion at the talk page. You mustn't keep reverting to the version of your choice. If you keep doing that, you may end up blocked from editing. The best way for you to have the article how you like, is to discuss it. You can't force the article to the way you prefer. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop reverting

I reverted again to the version of the other editor's choice. He is trying to engage you in a discussion at the talk page. You are simply trying to force your version without discussion. That is not appropriate. Wikipedia works by discussion and consensus.

Please leave the current version in place and use the talk page. If you persist in reverting, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you in advance for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Harbin Institute of Technology ‎. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:13, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

I don't know and I don't care which version of the article is better. I'm not taking sides about that and for all I know, you may be right. But, if one editor wants to discuss things at the article talk page, which he is trying to do, and has taken great care to present his case, then you must discuss things too. Click edit. Respond, please. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Multiple accounts

It seems that you are/were operating the following account(s). Just out of curiosity, is this true?

• 马兴毅 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Hitmanager (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:21, 8 January 2014 (UTC)