Hjb

Greetings! Welcome to Wikipedia!

You can get the whole Agnus Dei from Josquin's Missa l'homme armé (the first of the two he wrote) in the Historical Anthology of Music, Vol I (Harvard University Press) -- it should be easily available at a library. I'm not sure if the Agnus is available online; it isn't at the Choral Wiki (www.cpdl.org), which surprises me a little, because they have a lot of music available now. Good luck, and again welcome, and happy editing! Antandrus (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Harlan J. Brothers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harlan J. Brothers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harlan J. Brothers (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

LStravaganz (talk) 03:49, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Your paper on formulas for e

I noted here that the paper (of yours?) that you cited regarding a certain formula for the value of e does not actually seem to mention that formula. I hope you will discuss the matter on that page.

Thanks, Dominus 22:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:TCS Logo.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:TCS Logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 01:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) ^(Shout!) 01:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Country School

The article The Country School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable school.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harlan J. Brothers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CT and Branford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Harlan J. Brothers in 2012.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Harlan J. Brothers in 2012.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 06:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: Fair Use - WP:NFC#UUI §1. and Book Citations

Hi, Verno. Thank you for taking the time to deal with this. Two things:

1) The editor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Stefan2 also contacted me on the subject of the fair use of my photo File:Harlan J. Brothers in 2012.jpg. I responded with this message:

In fairness, WP:NFC#UUI §1 does state that it is "almost always" possible to replace the photo of a living person. In the interest of presenting a professional image that accurately reflects the content of the article, I believe that this photo is not currently replaceable and, under current circumstances, falls under the exceptions implied by the phase "almost always."

Is there an easy way to resolve this without removing the photo or unnecessarily taking more of your time with this issue?

2) After reading the MOSLOW documentation, I could not find information on acceptable formatting for book chapters. The format I used came from what appeared to be a well-established Wikipedia page. Thank you for your guidance!

Best, Harlan Hjb (talk) 21:53, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi! The usual standard for using non-free images of living people, is that they are allowed when the people are inaccessible (notable recluse, in prison, etc.), or for historical photos documenting a notable earlier appearance. That a free image may not be a professional quality portrait is usually not a sufficient reason to retain the image (since a free one would still be able to show what he looks like, which is the important part), but another admin will evaluate the image's status and read the reason you left there in a couple of days.

As to the tag I left on the article -- basically it's there for the "reverse chronological" issue that's mentioned in the text of template itself--it should go from earliest to most recent. I don't see any problems with the actual contents of the bibliography but I can't claim to be an expert on citation formats. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Hjb. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 23:21, 24 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 23:21, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Hjb. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 14:45, 25 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 14:45, 25 January 2013 (UTC)