Hkfreedomfighter

Hey I am HKfreedomfighter, if you want to contact me, contact me on reddit.com (u/hkfreedomfighter)

Hkfreedomfighter, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Hkfreedomfighter! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello, I'm Matthew hk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pro-Beijing camp (Hong Kong), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 10:21, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

We can't use wikipedia article as citation of another wiki article. Also, it is not constructive to remove book citation. Lastly, we use WP:primary source with a few criteria. Matthew hk (talk) 14:55, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

More on primary source and synthesis of source. The Democratic Party of Hong Kong is part of Pro-democracy camp (Hong Kong), but it is not able to support the fact that all parties in the camp are supporting that idea. The wiki article is lack of citation, but your citation is not that helpful either. Same thing applies to your edit in Pro-Beijing camp (Hong Kong). Also, please use secondary source for example academic paper by local politic depart of uni. Matthew hk (talk) 15:05, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2014 Hong Kong protests, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 09:28, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to List of totalitarian regimes while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 17:04, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Moving pages

Hi, per WP:RMUM, you should only make undiscussed moves if "It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move." This didn't apply to your move of National Executive Committee to National Executive Committee (UK Labour Party) for an obvious reason. Per Wikipedia:Article titles#Disambiguation and Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Naming the specific topic articles, we do not generally use parenthetical disambiguation unless there is a reason. If you had wanted to turn the NEC article into a disambiguation page because the NEC of the UK Labour Party was not the primary topic for that title, that may be okay although you most likely still should have used the WP:RM process. But there is no point when the NEC article still redirects to the NEC UK Labour Party article. The name of the body is National Executive Committee not National Executive Committee (UK Labour Party) and the subject of the article is obvious to anyone reading it. This is not that different from the way Civic Party should stay at that title, even though there appears to be a few defunct parties who were simply called "Civic Party" in English. And it likely should stay that way even if someone starts some minor party somewhere that is simply called Civic Party and despite being minor is WP:Notable under Wikipedia standards until and unless these parties grow significant enough, or the HK party grows insignificant enough, that it is no longer the primary topic for that title. Nil Einne (talk) 05:12, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Disambiguation page or hatnotes? makes the point about there being no need to disambiguate more clearly. Nil Einne (talk) 05:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Victoria Shanghai Academy concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Victoria Shanghai Academy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Victoria Shanghai Academy

Hello, Hkfreedomfighter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Victoria Shanghai Academy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Atlantic306 (talk) 02:09, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)