User talk:Hmehta0120/sandbox
Name of student reviewer: Savitrie Rampersaud
Date of review 05/07/13
Name of Editor: Hmehta0120
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hmehta0120/sandbox#Wiki_Edit
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/07/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 05/07/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): Length of edit long
Image (needed/appropriate): N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Information is accurate and can be found from the text
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-N/A
Wikiformatting: Bullet points would help
Grammar & composition: Good
Other comments: Good Job
..................... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.145.34 (talk) 01:24, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Name of student reviewer: Aisha Hamid
Date of review 4/24/13
Date of review:04/24/13
Name of Editor: Hmehta0120
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hmehta0120/sandbox#Wiki_Edit
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:04/25/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 04/25/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): Length of edit is good.
Image (needed/appropriate): No image needed. If image was added, it would be inappropriate.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Information is accurate. It is from the Schultz and Schultz textbook, and cited. It fits in well with the wiki article.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-N/A
Wikiformatting: Formatting is good. Bullet points enhance the text.
Grammar & composition: Grammar and composition is accurate, no errors.
Other comments: Good Job! The information is helpful to the article you plan on posting to.
(Aisha Hamid (talk) 23:42, 25 April 2013 (UTC))
Name of student reviewer: Jasmine R Basnight
Date of review 4/25/13
Date of review:04/24/13
Name of Editor: Hmehta0120
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hmehta0120/sandbox#Wiki_Edit
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:04/25/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 04/25/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): The length of this edit is fine
Image (needed/appropriate): No image needed.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Information is accurate.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-N/A
Wikiformatting: This was used succsfully
Grammar & composition: Grammar and composition is accurate
Other comments: Good Job!
(MsPsychology (talk) 23:42, 25 April 2013 (UTC))
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:MsNika349 |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 4/27/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Hmehta0120 |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hmehta0120/sandbox#Wiki_Edit |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 04/27/13 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 04/27/13 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Needed |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Yes |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
| Wikiformatting | Great format |
| Grammar & composition | Good grammar and composition. No mistakes noticed. |
| Other comments | Good edit material in general. |
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
edit| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:M.Caban |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 4/29/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Hmehta0120 |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hmehta0120/sandbox#Wiki_Edit |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 04/29/13 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 04/29/13 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | A little long but no errors seemed to be found. So it can be beneficial. |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | If can be found it would be beneficial |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
| Wikiformatting | Good format |
| Grammar & composition | Good |
| Other comments | Good job |
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
edit| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Azahur |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/09/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Hmehta0120 |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hmehta0120/sandbox#Wiki_Edit |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/09/2013 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 5/09/2013 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | none needed |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
| Wikiformatting | Good format |
| Grammar & composition | Good |
| Other comments | Good job |
Azahur (talk) 05:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
editPre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Name of student reviewer: Aisha Hamid
Date of review: 5/9/2013
Name of editor: Hmehta0120
URL of editor’s Userpage:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hmehta0120/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 5/9/2013
Date review submitted to instructor: 5/09/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short):Edit is lengthy, but is essential for the amount of information you have provided. So I would say overall good.
Image (needed/appropriate): Great use of image, to represent and support your information.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): N/A- Article based
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes the article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed.
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes the article is does relate to I/O psych and support the information you have provided and supports the article you plan on to edit.
Wikiformatting: Great formatting. The use of paragraph helps understand the material. Also use of bold, italics grabs a reader’s attention.
Grammar & composition: Good
Other comments: Great edit!