Hoffbell

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all pages relating to genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--Tryptofish (talk) 20:16, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

peer review

Hi there, I just finished reading through your addition to the article "March Against Monsanto: Difference between revisions", the section 'The Fox Network and Monsanto'. The section is very well done and provides a compelling, yet neutral, account of the events. Your writing does not sway to much to one side or the other, and you simply present the facts as they occurred. While you provide some good references to back up your statements, some of these listed in the reference list appear to be missing links or incomplete, so I would suggest revising these. Just a few minor grammatical errors or awkward sentence structures, but overall a really solid section. Nice job! Lhalas (talk) 23:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)