Hong Kong Ian
| This is Hong Kong Ian's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Pai Kok Station has been accepted
edit
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 14:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Page moves
editHi! Please don't move any more pages to implausible titles such as Redirect to Forky Page; in fact it'd probably be better if you didn't move any pages at all for a while. If you need help with a move, ask here on this page – I should see that you have done so. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Forky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:06, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
U.S. Senate diagram
editHi,
I saw you replaced the previous diagram of the U.S. Senate composition in the template with a new version you uploaded. While thanking you for the contribution, I wanted to ask if there are some specific reasons that led you to prefer the version from "parliament tool". Unfortunately the version you uploaded does not make the reading of the partisan division very easy, being the vertical separation between the two halfs (isle) non-existent. I think it would be better to revert to the old picture, giving the fact that in my opinion the previous version is better suited to represent seats in a 100-member assembly. I hope the hear from you soon, bye! --Foghe (talk) 17:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)