HornedFrog2012
March 2012
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu t/c 21:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)HornedFrog2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was not "Sock Puppeting" nor was I pushing a point of view. I edited a page of an elected official and added information that was 100% factual. I sourced my information and it was not pushing a point of view. Those who objected are pushing a point of view by eliminating information about an elected official. By doing so, they are pushing the point of view that everything about him is positive. Omitting information is more opinionated than adding facts. Also, as for your "Sock Puppeting" charge, I share a computer and network with multiple people. I am not a "sock puppet". This account is my only account. Please unblock me. This is supposed to be an open forum. Stop censoring people because the facts are not popular.
Decline reason:
You share a computer and network with another editor making the same edits as yourself; that's called abusing multiple accounts, and it's not acceptable. Of course you were pushing a point of view; every sentence you put in Kenny Marchant displays a decidedly negative point of view. --jpgordon::==( o ) 22:41, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|reason=I would love to see what I wrote that was "decidedly negative". This is not an open forum, this is pandering to the highest bidder.}}