Hukris

Talk pages

The aim of taking things to talk pages of articles is to gain consensus on changes. Not just stating something and then going ahead with it.

Yet again, you removed things without explaining what is incorrect. You simply state this person has no qualifications in the subject matter. Yet you bring nothing to the articles yourself. Equine-man (talk) 17:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

No it isn't. Per Wikipedia:Reliable Sources if a source is unreliable it needs to be removed. You are lying and acting in bad faith at this point, are you friends with Dekker? I already brought Eric Brownstein's source back to the article to replace Dekker. Dekker lied in his website claiming the Qing didn't forcefully replace Mongol bows with Manchu ones which Eric Browstein says they did.Hukris (talk) 19:16, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

"Because of Wikipedia's popularity, it has become a target for folks looking to promote their sites, which is against Wikipedia policies. Wikipedia is not a free advertising platform"

You have this on your talk page and you reverted me removing Peter Dekker's self promotional website which has no academic value, you know what you are doing is against Wikipedia rules Equine-Man.Hukris (talk) 19:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Sources

Please see my apology on your RS thread. We were both coming from different directions, but I should have taken more care to look at the source itself you were removing.

As you seem to have more knowledge on the subject than I, and the articles are on my watchlist, please do improve the articles with the correct info. I would be interested in broadening my knowledge and read what you have to add. Equine-man (talk) 21:16, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

However you do really need to read wp:bludgeon and WP:DROPIT (especially when you have "won"). Slatersteven (talk) 09:39, 29 August 2023 (UTC)