Humane doctor

Baptist Medical Center sex reassignment surgery controversy

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to the article Baptist Medical Center sex reassignment surgery controversy. You've added a great deal of content. I don't know if you're familiar with our policies, but Wikipedia requires information in articles to cite sources. Can you add some citations to the article? Thanks, --Alynna (talk) 13:10, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 'Patricide In Oklahoma: The Killing of Charles Birdsong'

The article 'Patricide In Oklahoma: The Killing of Charles Birdsong' has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hoax page. Cannot verify any of the listed sources; the book cited does not mention this name at all. No other results came up in a search for reliable sources, so this article also fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Darkwind (talk) 02:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stigler,OK Ten Commandments Controversy

The article Stigler,OK Ten Commandments Controversy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Small-town controversy with no apparent repercussions outside the town where it is happening.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Magus Books

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Magus Books, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Magus Books and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bagheera (talk) 23:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

On the subject of this article

I'm going to refer you, for this one, to our notability guidelines, as well as reliable sources. Admittedly, I was about to do the speedy myself, but was beaten to it.

For the purpose, I'm also going to refer you to WP:PEACOCK - it's a good guideline to follow that explains what not to put in an article. In this case, I think giving it a rave review in the article is what's going to kill it.

Back to the original point, my advice to you is to dig up some good sources for this bookshop. That it exists is great. Considering that it's also an occult shop, though, may well keep it down - there are many such stores throughout the US, and not very many are terribly notable. From what I gather from one or two shops around here in Seattle, that may be the way they want to keep it. =) --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 23:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Final warning

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Green v. Haskell County Board of Commissioners, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bearian (talk) 16:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC) I don't know what I did wrong. In the latest Stigler News Sentinel the story of the ACLU wanting 250,000 dollars in court fees was reported. I created the wikipedia page 'Green Vs. Haskell County Board of Supervisers'. I would not 'vandalize' my own page. That statement about the ACLU is true. And I created the topic to begin with. signed 'Humane Doctor'.