Thank you for experimenting with the page Wikipedia:Requests for adminship on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. — Scientizzle 00:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Nakon 00:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Deelipwithunlogo.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Deelipwithunlogo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:53, 30 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 22:53, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dalit Genocide for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dalit Genocide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalit Genocide until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tchaliburton (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 15:46, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • To the best of my knowledge you appear to be here to promote a specific cause and to upload text from various other news articles on the Internet. I'm a little surprised that this wasn't caught and you weren't blocked years ago, but I'm rectifying that now. I don't honestly see where you are really here to positively contribute to Wikipedia in any way. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 15:46, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply