HumilatedGoan

Ways to improve The Battle of Eternal Shores

Hello, HumilatedGoan,

Thank you for creating The Battle of Eternal Shores.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The writing sounds like it was written by AI.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Raydann}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 14:34, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your contributed article, The Battle of Eternal Shores

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, The Battle of Eternal Shores. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2023 Israel–Hamas war. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2023 Israel–Hamas war. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Wikishovel (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Battle of Kfar Aza

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Battle of Kfar Aza. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Kfar Aza massacre. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kfar Aza massacre. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Wikishovel (talk) 18:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Sufa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Sufa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 10:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

okay, sorry for the trouble. HumilatedGoan (talk) 11:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

I think Times of Israel is a reliable source for my Battle of Sufa page, and also All-Israel news is also a reliable source.

I think my page is perfect and should be avalible for the public. HumilatedGoan (talk) 11:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Hi HumilatedGoan,

The creation of Draft:Battle of Sufa / Battle of Sufa is incompatible with the "500 edits" restriction mentioned in the blue box above. Please have a look at WP:A/I/PIA and WP:ARBECR; it even applies to internal discussions such as deletion discussions ("AfD") and requested move discussions ("RMs").

I'm not deleting the page because it has been substantially edited by Wikishovel in the meantime, so WP:G5 does not longer apply.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:11, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Battle of Sufa. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:17, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Dawn's Edge (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Dawn's Edge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for editing pages related to the Arab-Israeli conflict from an account that does not have 500 edits, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 72 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. FatCat96 Yak 14:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of 2023 storming of Tammun and Qabatiya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 storming of Tammun and Qabatiya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 storming of Tammun and Qabatiya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Longhornsg (talk) 03:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

why for deletion? it is a real ongoing battle HumilatedGoan (talk) 13:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating the WP:ARBECR in place in the topic area, shortly after a previous block for the same, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 19:42, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

I will not be entertaining appeals by email here. I also will not be entertaining appeals written by AI. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 19:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

bro can i atleast have permission to edit my sandbox??? HumilatedGoan (talk) 15:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

No, you are blocked from editing any page on this wiki except this user talk page. You may appeal as described above. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 09:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Alright,

I want to acknowledge my mistakes in violating Wikipedia:ARBECR, and I sincerely apologize for the trouble i caused. i assure you that I have learned from my mistakes and i am committed to avoiding them in the future.

please consider unblocking my account.

regards HumilatedGoan (talk) 15:35, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

hello? can you respond? HumilatedGoan (talk) 15:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi HumiliatedGoan. Please see the instructions in the yellow block notice above, beginning with "If you believe this block is unjustified," for the procedure to appeal your block. Since you are blocked under an arbitration enforcement sanction, we cannot consider your appeal unless you follow those instructions. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HumilatedGoan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please copy my appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard or administrators' noticeboard.

I want to acknowledge my mistakes in violating Wikipedia:ARBECR, and I sincerely apologize for the trouble i caused. i assure you that I have learned from my mistakes and i am committed to avoiding them in the future.

please consider unblocking my account. HumilatedGoan (talk) 16:09, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This statement is not worth transferring to a noticeboard as it would not result in a consensus to unblock you. You need to specifically confront the reasons for the block and describe the changes you will make. 331dot (talk) 19:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HumilatedGoan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Dear Wikipedia Moderators, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to tell you about a problem I had while editing on Wikipedia. I was working on the Israel-Hamas war 2023 Battles articles, but I made some mistakes. I want to say sorry if I caused any trouble. I know that Wikipedia needs lots of good editors to keep everything accurate and great. I promise I will be a better editor and contribute lots of useful information. I really love writing about the Israel-Hamas conflict, and I will make sure my writing follows the rules. Thank you for understanding and being patient with me. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do. Take care, HumilatedGeon HumilatedGoan (talk) 14:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is the problem with chatbot-generated requests; nothing indicates that you actually know why you are blocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot please review and look after my appeal again. HumilatedGoan (talk) 14:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

I've removed the nowiki coding you had in place which prevented proper display of your request. This request is an improvement, but does not go into detail about your actions. You need to describe specifically what your mistakes were, this shows your understanding. I am not closing your request since I already closed one, so another admin will review this, but that's what I think. 331dot (talk) 15:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

@Jpgordon. I did not use any kind of AI or chatbot to write this appeal.

and of course i know why i was blocked.

I have red and fully understood my ban reason, and i want to be unbanned.

In the future i will stricly follow the wiki rules, and be more careful.

Regards HumilatedGoan (talk) 08:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

@Jpgordon please read this. HumilatedGoan (talk) 13:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

{{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]].Alright Fine. I have learnt from my mistakes and want to appeal to get unbanned, i will no longer commit edits without the talk channel usage and will try my best to make wikipedia better. Thanks for reading my appeal. im looking forward for your response and also for my unban. HumilatedGoan (talk) 15:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC)}}

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Dawn's Edge

Hello, HumilatedGoan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Dawn's Edge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC)