Hurricane Kirk (2024) moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Hurricane Kirk (2024). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Just a random Wikipedian(talk) 23:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much! HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 23:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hurricane Kirk

edit

Hello I’m IrishSurfer21 a fellow editor on Wikipedia. I appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, but not everything meets the notability guidelines for an article. You have removed a redirect for Hurricane Kirk (2024) to create an article for this storm. I appreciate your edits but unfortunately it does not meet any notability criteria for a separate article as this storm has not caused any deaths or damage, nor has it broken any significant record. Next time, it would be helpful if you consulted other editors on the season talk page before making an article that does not immediately meet notability criteria. Thank you!IrishSurfer21 (talk) 23:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

It seems another editor covered most of my points right around the time I posted my message on your talk page. Ignore most of my post above, except remember to consult the season talk page before making a separate article for individual tropical cyclones.IrishSurfer21 (talk) 23:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
It is currently a draft, and also, thanks for your advice! HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 23:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Kirk (2024) (October 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JalenBarks was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jalen Barks (Woof) 02:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, HurricaneKirk2024! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jalen Barks (Woof) 02:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
How can I extend it? I truly do need your advice! HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 02:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Kirk (2024) (October 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by JalenBarks were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: We also cannot accept drafts written with a large language model.
Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:12, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Overtrout

edit
  Sizzle!

The trout you used to slap another Wikipedian has been gutted, roasted over the coals, and served with tartar sauce.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that, just like the trout in this picture, you have overused your {{trout}}.

I know you contribute in good faith, but I truly advise you to stop trouting people that disagree with your positions, especially when they're only doing so to comply with Wikipedia content policies. Doing so can be interpreted as a personal attack and should be avoided. Thank you. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 13:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Overtrout? HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 14:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Here you trouted WeatherWriter, who had no interaction with you or indeed any on-wiki activity at all since you registered.
Here you trouted Sir MemeGod for no clear reason.
Here you trouted Sir MemeGod again, literally four minutes later, for accusing you of sockpuppetry, and then proceeded to brag about it.
And finally, here, you trouted Hurricane Clyde for no clear reason.
Per WP:TROUT, trouting isn't something done at random for no reason; it's done as a humourous and friendly way to send a message to another editor that they've made a mistake. I can't see what mistakes these editors had made, and trouting for literally no reason is not appreciated.
If you would like to interact with others positively, there are plenty of WikiLove templates you can give them if you want to show your appreciation towards their contributions to the site. See Wikipedia:WikiLove for that. At the bottom of the page are a list of templates that can be shown to other users that are likely to be appreciated more than the trout template. Thank you. GeorgeMemulous (talk) GeorgeMemulous (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I do want to politely add that barnstars can be overused too. Go easy on them because you can dilute their importance when doing that. Especially ones like “Defender of the Wiki”. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
it seems like everything is overused :| HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 16:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
can you help me on a article btw? HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 16:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've seen the articles you've created so far, and notice a lot fail WP:GNG, the guidelines for notability, as they are now (though I believe Fourteen may need its own article soon, once it develops). However, you can still practice in draft or user namespace. If you point me towards a draft you created, I can give feedback on what should be improved about it. To create a page in userspace, go to User:HurricaneKirk2024/exampledraft and create the page from there. You can easily find this through the search function by clicking on the red link that appears at the top of the search page. Please also note that userspace drafts should only be made in your userspace, i.e. User:HurricaneKirk2024/example. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 16:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
The article for Helene was created when it was lierally Tropical Depression Nine. I think it needs an article now so we can get a live view of the timeline of Hurricane Milton. HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 16:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's not a problem. Assuming nobody beats you to it, if you have a sufficient quality draft, you can move it to article space under the appropriate title when the system does become notable enough to have an article. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 16:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
yeah I think I’ll wait to make it an article until it dissipates HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Some tropical cyclones (like Hurricane Helene for instance) are worthy of an article well before it dissipates. If you’re referring to Kirk; that storm is headed along quite honestly the least impactful track that a hurricane could take in the Atlantic Ocean. No direct threats to any land. So it might not be worthy of an article at all; but that said, it would certainly be worthy of a mention in 2024 Atlantic hurricane season. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
If you’re referring to TD-Fourteen; it will probably be worthy of an article; but let’s wait until Milton forms first before we create an article. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:32, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
yeah I know Kirk is gonna be iffy; I’m talking abt TD 14 HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 17:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Just make sure no one ain’t already created it under Draft:Hurricane Milton (2024) or Draft:Tropical Storm Milton (2024) before beginning. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Moving the talk here

edit

Let’s just move the talk here’s also yes you can work on TD14. JAFactsDude (talk) 14:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

can you move Draft:Invest 92L (2024) to Draft:Tropical Depression 14 (2024) for me pls? HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 14:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
do not copy and paste btw HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 15:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
then what do you want me to do… JAFactsDude (talk) 15:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I’ll work on your Infobox for TD14 rn JAFactsDude (talk) 15:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thx HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also I think someone else is already making one for tropical depression 14 JAFactsDude (talk) 15:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yeah just make the article, idc yet HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 15:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I requested a merge later HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 15:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I don’t know how to merge JAFactsDude (talk) 15:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Just make the article, ok? HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 15:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Make the basis, and I’ll build onto it. HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 15:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also if that was you editing my article a few minutes ago, the meteorological history needs to be written better and also longer JAFactsDude (talk) 15:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
if you have problems, just undo it. HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 15:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
@JAFactsDude; @HurricaneKirk2024, there is already a draft on Draft:Tropical Depression Fourteen (2024), that one is the most likely to get nominated for creation. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Why? It’s like all my creations are bad. HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 17:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply