Huw Powell

user talk:Huw Powell/archive1

Lameness Huw Powell (talk) 05:47, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

censorship Huw Powell (talk) 07:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Your attitude

Comedy, sarcasm and making people who use IE4 feel bad is generally frowned upon at Wikipedia. Pirate^Argh!!1! 04:07, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry about that. While I may have thought I was being helpful, the tone was decidedly snide and inappropriate. Should I delete it or try to "collapse" it so it isn't a distraction to future readers? Should I add an apology to it on that talk page? Huw Powell (talk) 08:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

I've contacted numerous uninvolved neutral senior admins to arbitrate a punishment and address privacy issues. It doesn't really matter what you do because I plan on being outraged regardless of what happens. Pirate^Argh!!1! 09:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

I would like to learn how to be an angry extremist reactionary. Plz hlep eme!!1! Nuttish (talk) 21:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Huw, I've enjoyed your edits and your contribution to the environment of learning and teaching here. Godspeed. Nuttish (talk) 21:34, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

You are so kind, gentle stranger. Huw Powell (talk) 23:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Conservative Camp

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is The Conservative Camp. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Conservative Camp. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, oh gentle, useful, and generally harmless bot! Huw Powell (talk) 02:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Greeting’s

So, that’s where that blasted comma got to! Cheers¡ --Technopat (talk) 18:36, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Well right now, it's just being stored in a box marked "do not place singly between subject and predicate", but I'm sure I'll find a use for it soon. Huw Powell (talk) 23:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

MN Forward

Hi!

See my comment. -- 94.101.2.145 (talk) 18:58, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Minnesota Forward

The article Minnesota Forward has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Possible non notable political action group

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 13:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I started a talk page section for you to present your concerns. Huw Powell (talk) 18:23, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Newsletter

The Aquarium Fishes WikiProject Newsletter Issue XII - January 2011

News Please welcome our new members: JacquesVermaak,Huw Powell and Bondolo. See or edit the current tasklist here Discussions & Collaborations New columns for information on pH, temperature, water hardness and salinity have been added to the List of marine aquarium fish species, List of freshwater aquarium fish species and List of brackish aquarium fish species The List of aquarium diseases realy needs expansion. The List of marine aquarium invertebrate species has been greatly improved by User:bondolo.

Other Happy New Year! We are now ready to restart the awards program, but no one has done it yet. If you are up for the challenge please come forward.

edits to Roy Masters (commentator)

The Masters article needs trimming of contentious, unsourced material, not the opposite. Eg. appending "the cult of Roy" to a heading that made no reference a so-called cult of Roy is misleading. Any contentious material needs to be sourced, per WP:LIVE. Mrtea (talk) 05:23, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

The article is complex, and definitely needs work. It's hard to "reference" a heading. Feel free to remove the contentious part I added, and thank you for bringing it up here. Huw Powell (talk) 06:22, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Sgt. Pepper Straw Poll

There is currently a straw poll taking place here. Your input would be appreciated. ~ GabeMc ^{(talk|contribs)} 23:37, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Presented my opinion, thanks, though the logic it is based on will probably entail thousands if not millions of edits to adhere to. Huw Powell (talk) 00:04, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Essential oil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Expression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm, thanks, interesting I missed that. Unfortunately, the meaning needed is not listed on that DA page. Huw Powell (talk) 23:42, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Found what was needed at Ram press (food). Thanks, DPL bot... Huw Powell (talk) 23:45, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

The Beatles poll

Hello — this message is to inform you that there is currently a public poll to determine whether to capitalize the definite article ("the") when mentioning the band "THE BEATLES" mid-sentence. As you've previously participated either here, here, or here, your input would be appreciated. Thank you for your time. ~~~~ Jburlinson (talk) 03:12, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Huw Powell (talk) 01:33, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack Sinclair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Brothers Big Sisters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blizzard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Wellington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:44, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Fixed. Huw Powell (talk) 16:28, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SOP, SOIC and BGA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:37, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm Viriditas. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Data science because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Viriditas (talk) 07:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

This is unacceptable. If you do it again, you'll get reported to ANI. I hope this warning is clear. Viriditas (talk) 08:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

The article is devoid of content despite having many words. It needs to be rewritten from the ground up, which is where I left it. And please, who are you to make threats and warnings? Kindly assume good faith before attacking me again. Huw Powell (talk) 01:18, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Bypassing redirects

Hello, there's no point in bypassing redirects, as you did at Bubble and squeak. Then again, there's no point in reverting redirect bypasses, because that wastes even more server resources for no good reason. However, I'm going to undo part of your edit to Joni Mitchell, where I first encountered your contributions, because "R&B" is far more commonly used than "rhythm and blues". Graham87 15:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Why is there no point? The reason is to avoid double redirects developing. And "bypass" as you linked says nothing about this. What I did was fix a link that did not go directly to the intended page. "R&B" is leetspeak for the encyclopedic correct phrase "rhythm and blues". Thank you for dropping by. Huw Powell (talk) 01:51, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

If you really insist on it showing as "R&B", pipe the link. Huw Powell (talk) 01:55, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Whoops, the guideline I meant to show you was this one, which definitely applies to your situation. Wikipedia should use the terms that are most commonly understood by readers. Graham87 06:47, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Ah, thanks, very interesting. It used to matter IIRC, but I stand corrected. I see how R&B could be a "redirect with possibilities". Could be a tough habit to break, so bear with me please. Huw Powell (talk) 00:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 9 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Owl page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 03:43, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

It's all good, I think, by the time I was done I had killed all the useless links to the cruft page. Huw Powell (talk) 09:41, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

A Tesla Roadster for you!

	A Tesla Roadster for you!
	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 01:49, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Aw, shucks, thank you! Huw Powell (talk) 02:50, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Energy Star, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Container glass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

It doesn't appear to be a real DA page. Editing it and its talk page to reflect this. Huw Powell (talk) 03:06, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Soliciting comment...

Hi! Would you care to review or comment at my FA nomination for the article Misterioso (Thelonious Monk album)? It is a short article about a jazz album. Information on reviewing an FA nomination's criteria is available at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 19:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

The image captions seem a little forced. Getting there, though. Huw Powell (talk) 02:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Mazy run for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mazy run is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mazy run until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. IagoQnsi 03:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Huw Powell. You have new messages at WP:MCQ.
Message added 08:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ww2censor (talk) 08:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

You people are so useless. Huw Powell (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jesus Christ Superstar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Turner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia has made a huge mistake

The new fonts - the awful serifs for headers and whatever that godawful sans-serif they are now using for content - are both unreadable.

I'll be gone from this site - reading and editing - until these awful user-experience errors are fixed. Bye bye, your website sucks. Huw Powell (talk) 07:13, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

You can fix the issues by clicking on this link and following the instructions. --AussieLegend (✉) 08:26, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Huw Powell (talk) 00:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drag racing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IHRA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. Huw Powell (talk) 04:59, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Russell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. It's ok, there are several people named Jack Russell. Huw Powell (talk) 15:19, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

please use edit summary

Hi, if you could be so kind, can you toss in a small edit summary when you edit? I have nothing against your edit on the [Bitcoin]] page which I contribute to too, but an edit summary would facilitate working through my watch list a lot. It's a simple form of paying respect to others.--Wuerzele (talk) 02:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

I probably should just tag the "minor edit" box when I add a missing word. Thanks. Huw Powell (talk) 03:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

BrEng/AmEmg squabbling

Are we about to edit war over this? Seems very petty, considering that the spelling of "whilst" (which is absolutely acceptable in the UK) has remained on the article for three years. MOS:RETAIN also states "With few exceptions (e.g. when a topic has strong national ties or a term/spelling carries less ambiguity), there is no valid reason for such a change." Mac Dreamstate (talk) 16:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

You really should relax, chum. I've corrected that archaic term a few hundred times by now and you're the first to get all angsty about it. Edit war? Seriously? According to your link they aren't really equivalent, by the way. This little tempest in a teapot isn't worth looking up the place in the MOS where I found this recommendation years ago. Huw Powell (talk) 18:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

You keep saying it's archaic, but that's according to AmEng. In BrEng, "whilst" is still an acceptable and prevalent variation; the article pertains to an album recorded in Britain by a British artist, and has retained BrEng for some time now. As for MOS, I consulted it because that's where WP has a guideline on changing/not changing regional spellings—which is what you came along and did. Granted, WP does go on to state that neither AmEng or BrEng is favoured (oh dear, should that be favored?), but it also recommends to avoid going around changing them on a whim or opinion. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

(undent for ease of pasting quotes)

"Wikipedia tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English. Insisting on a single term or a single usage as the only correct option does not serve the purposes of an international encyclopedia."

"Penguin Working Words recommends while only, and notes that whilst is old-fashioned. Cambridge Guide to English Usage and M-W's Webster's Guide to English Usage comment on its regional character, and note that it is rare in American usage.[118] It is thus safer to use only while in international English."

"Some publications on both sides of the Atlantic disapprove of whilst in their style guides (along with "amidst" and "amongst"); for example:

• Times Online Style Guide: "while (not whilst)"[7]
• Guardian Style Guide: "while not whilst"[8]
• Hansard: the Canadian Parliament record: "while not whilst"[9]"

"While" is perfectly acceptable British English. Both the Grauniad and the Times disapprove of "whilst". I did not change a "regional spelling", I removed a pretentious use of language. If I do it again, you'd be reverting me three times. My preference would be for you to take a chill pill and mind your own apples. Huw Powell (talk) 00:32, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Alrighty then, go ahead and have your way. But I'll just say to this: "My preference would be for you to take a chill pill and mind your own apples." Not very civil, but as you like. In turn, my preference will be to hopefully not cross paths with the likes of you again. :-) Mac Dreamstate (talk) 00:45, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Saying I made my edit based "on a whim or opinion" isn't the friendliest approach to take either, and neither is bringing up edit warring in your first sentence. So be it. Huw Powell (talk) 15:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thyme may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• name of the genus of fish ''[[Thymallus]]'', first given to the [[Grayling (species)|grayling]] (''T. thymallus'' described in the [[10th edition of Systema Naturae|1758 edition of ''Systema
• of Systema Naturae|1758 edition of ''Systema Naturae'']] by Swedish zoologist [[Carl Linnaeus]]} originates from the faint smell of the herb thyme, which emanates from the flesh.<ref>{{cite web |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:42, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, it didn't break, but I did use a bracket instead of a parenthesis... Huw Powell (talk) 20:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Huw Powell. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Huw Powell. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Huw Powell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)