Hypaattia

It is unacceptable to remove accurate information that is important in describing the professional experience of the individual because of a subjective reason. Only inaccurate information can be removed. Hypaattia (talk) 23:52, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Appropriately and accurately, professional experience was entered in the front paragraphs with appropriate referencing as done in almost all wikipedia pages for individuals. Hypaattia (talk) 23:52, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

There were duplicative statements that were inserted in the front paragraphs after they were typed in the section under "Administrative leave". All of the information has been preserved and is moved under administrative leave, where it was already included. If left were it was before as part of the first paragraph, it made the impression that the sentence was inserted there not to accurately describe the incidents, as required by Wikipedia rules and ethics, but rather as a malicious act against the individual.Hypaattia (talk) 20:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Linda Katehi. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. James (^talk/_contribs) 23:29, 2 May 2017 (UTC)23:52, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Linda Katehi. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. James (^talk/_contribs) 00:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Hypaattia reported by User:James Allison (Result: ). Thank you. James (^talk/_contribs) 21:52, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Hypaattia, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Hypaattia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Linda Katehi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Someguy1221 (talk) 00:47, 4 May 2017 (UTC)