User talk:HyperGaruda/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions about User:HyperGaruda. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Abbasi
Abbasi now has one reference. Should it be deleted, or instead be copyedited? See also Talk:Abbasi.--DThomsen8 (talk) 13:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Dthomsen8: You could always make a disambiguation page out of it, with links leading to Abbasi (currency) and the various people named Abbasi. At least get rid of the (unsourced) history of the Abbasid dynasty. - HyperGaruda (talk) 13:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- And apparently there are also various places named "Abbasi". By the way, that one reference is not exactly a reliable source. - HyperGaruda (talk) 14:04, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal
- added a link pointing to Musnad
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Warning to Stop Edit Warring at QURANISM
Hyper garuda, Wikipedia's founder Jimmy Wales said that Wikipedia should be constructive ADD don't delete. instead of removing 27,827 bytes, ADD. don't be negative be constructive.
This is your final warning to stop edit warring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:DE91:DC00:11DC:F935:2C57:3FA8 (talk) 10:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The More Hype than Wu-Tang Award | |
Like a sniper, hyper off the Ginseng root. Drmies (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC) |
February 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Muawiyah I may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Muawiyah_I page
HyperGaruda you recently removed a lot of text from the Muawiyah_I page. Please understand that we spent years collecting that information and then writing it.
HyperGaruda was there any particular reason why you did not discuss this on the talk page before removing it. You could have consulted everyone who contributed to this page. We all spent a lot of effort collecting all the content. --Johnleeds1 (talk) 22:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Johnleeds1: My initial concern was that the page was over 200 kB in size, more than 4 times the recommended page size. In addition to being difficult to load the page on low-end devices, a wall of text like that is not pleasant to read at all. Thus I started too look at what could be moved out, either by merging to other articles or simply deleting if the content is already covered in other articles. Depending on whether or not the passages were relevant, I would leave a short summary to keep the prose continuous. Please refer to edit descriptions in the article's revision history for a breakdown of why I (re)moved certain sections (most of the time they were not directly related to Mu‘âwiyah himself, i.e. a WP:COATRACK). Also, you -because it was apparently you who quadrupled the page in this edit- tend to add large amounts of verbatim quotes from non-free sources. Even if properly attributed, that amount of quoting could be considered copyright infringement. - HyperGaruda (talk) 07:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC
HyperGaruda this page touches on a lot of other articles in wikipedia. I will be looking at the pages surrounding it in the next few months too. We went through a huge discussion and had to do a lot of work while building this article. We had to use so many quotes because Sunnis did not know what Sunni books said and the Shias did not know what their books said and they kept of arguing. Even though the earlier books had similar content. By using so many references, we managed to stabilise the article and showed what the various books actually said. We also used a lot of books from western academics. Hence the article remained stable for around 2 years event though it covered very contentious subjects. HyperGaruda over the next few months I will be working with you on various articles. HyperGaruda it will be good to work with you. --Johnleeds1 (talk) 21:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Fajr decade
An article that you have been involved in editing—Fajr decade —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Abdullahfaruqibnibrahimy
HyperGaruda Alexf FreeatlastChitchat Actually I did not know rules and regulations of wikipedia. And I still do not know rules and regulations of wikipedia very well. I have seen that a youtube video of Sheikh Imran Hosein is added as external link in page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masih_ad-Dajjal. So I have also added my youtube video as external link in wikipedia. Previously I have added a pdf file in list of external links. But that link is also removed. Now I am confused about what is an acceptable link for listing in the external link of wikipedia. I am trying to provide some additional information to readers. Now I am interested to add this link, which is https://abdullahfaruq.wordpress.com, in list of external links of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi page. Now is this acceptable ? This time I want to make sure that it is acceptable before editing wikipedia so you can not object to me later. My writing contains highly reliable text. You can verify it with someone, who knows very well about this subject. And what is wrong if my writing is self-published ? If the problem is with publishing on my blog or google drive or youtube channel then is it going to solve the problem if I publish it on someone else blog or google drive or website or youtube channel ? How are you going to accept one single paragraph of mine as linkable to list of external links of any page of wikipedia ? I guess wikipedia editors do response to this kind of questions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdullahfaruqibnibrahimy (talk • contribs) 20:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- I have replied at User talk:Abdullahfaruqibnibrahimy#February 2016. And please use section headings (titles between "=" (equals-to) signs) when starting a different discussion. - HyperGaruda (talk) 06:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Chris18.07/sandbox
A tag has been placed on Chris18.07/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
care to help?
here at Assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 16:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oh dear, what have you gotten yourself into again... I'll see what I can do. - HyperGaruda (talk) 17:29, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Succession to Muhammad page
I started work on the Succession to Muhammad page [1] a few years ago and then stopped because there were a lot of contradictions in the various texts. And a lot of politics. So I have been digging around. Do you know much about this subject. --Johnleeds1 (talk) 22:52, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Minor Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your edits on a page I've been working on, I'm glad people are happy to contribute! Cdunbarc (talk) 14:30, 18 March 2016 (UTC) |
Changing reference systems
Hi User:HyperGaruda. I see that you've made some edits to some of the articles my students are working on, thank you! However, I am concerned that you changed a student's decision to use sfn. I think Wikipedians who create an article should use whatever system they think best and the sfn method permits an easy way to disentangle the prose of the article from bibliography: It makes it much easier for other people to review and edit. (Personally, I have a difficulty time reading source with huge globs of bibliographic templates within the prose.) In any case, I don't think any system is agreed upon by Wikipedians in general as the best or most approriate (correct me if I'm wrong) and we should be careful of making such changes without a good reason. -Reagle (talk) 19:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Canal lining Article
Hi HyperGaruda, Thank you for letting me know that the article on Canal lining is a duplicate. Is there an easy way to consolidate the two articles to fix this? -RaggyMan — Preceding unsigned comment added by RaggyMan (talk • contribs) 15:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- @RaggyMan: Hey there! Take a look at WP:MERGETEXT (section "How to merge"). It gives a step-by-step guide on how to properly merge two pages. It is basically copy-pasting, combined with a note that the content was copy-pasted from A to B. From the looks of it, you can skip steps 3, 5, and 6. I do suggest that you merge the content from Canal Lining to Canal lining (i.e. the latter gets all the content), because of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization). Happy editing! - HyperGaruda (talk) 16:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue Mosque (Amsterdam), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slotervaart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Regarding Darling London
- Dear User:HyperGaruda, First i would like to thank you for your well contribution to Wikipedia. Well i am writing on your talk page regarding an article that you recently edited Darling London, Thanks again for visiting and editing this article. I have two points:
1. There is one orphan tag on this article, How can i remove that tag? i found no other article that contains "Darling London" name!
2. In the first paragraph you mentioned [not in citation given] for 1st citation, For resolve this tag can i edit the title of first citation from "Not your usual granny tweed!" to "Elsa jacket, £99, darlingclothes.com;". I found this new title on URL available in first citation. or may i remove first citation?
Sorry for my bad English
Thanks
BP (talk) 06:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Patel.bhupesh: Oops, I totally forgot about this. I am so sorry for not replying any sooner. About the orphan tag: be creative and think about what article should mention the company. For example: Darling London is located at Fitzroy Square, so you could add a sentence+link on that page. For more suggestions, check out Wikipedia:Orphan#Various ways to de-orphan. It seems that Dthomsen8 has already taken care of the second problem. - HyperGaruda (talk) 20:02, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
If you have the time...
I'm trying to build Chief Justice of Indonesia, but keep finding myself pulled away from the computer. I'm surprised there wasn't already an article for this. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hey MezzoMezzo! I'll see if I can import some bits and pieces from id-wiki and other sources, but you will have to excuse me until this weekend, when I've got the time to do more than minor copyediting. - HyperGaruda (talk) 08:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- No problem man, any help would better the encyclopedia. One question as well, as this one escapes me: Indonesia has the Supreme Court of Indonesia and the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. The title of the article I created is "Chief Justice of Indonesia" but in retrospect I feel I might need to turn that one into a disambiguation page and then make a separate article for both chief justices. Does that sound more accurate? MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:47, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- @MezzoMezzo: you're absolutely right there. I'd say, go for it :) - HyperGaruda (talk) 06:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's now done and done: Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Indonesia and Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia.
- Also, I'm sorry if I sort of dumped data entry work on you; I know you do a lot more meta work that's more involved than that. Though speaking of meta work...I noticed that many of the photos for these judges and justices on the Indonesian wiki aren't on Commons. Do you know a page where I can read about how to copy them to Commons so they can be used here on the English wiki? MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- @MezzoMezzo: You're doing a bang-up job there with the Chief Justice articles! I'm primarily doing meta work with the idea that, once in a while, I come across an interesting page which I can expand content-wise. In a way, you could say that I'm a WP:WikiOgre/WP:WikiGnome hybrid, so don't worry about giving me something else to do - I like a bit of variety ;) About the images: there is a bit of a copyright issue there. The images are from official government websites, so at first sight, they are eligible for commons:Template:PD-IDGov (images published by the govt are exempt from copyright). However, most of those websites have a copyright sign in the footer, so would fall under the exception mentioned in point b of that template. Even more confusing, the template is based on a law from 2002, while there is a new one from 2014 (see the talk page). Until the template gets updated, it may be difficult to upload those images to Commons. - HyperGaruda (talk) 09:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- @MezzoMezzo: you're absolutely right there. I'd say, go for it :) - HyperGaruda (talk) 06:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- No problem man, any help would better the encyclopedia. One question as well, as this one escapes me: Indonesia has the Supreme Court of Indonesia and the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. The title of the article I created is "Chief Justice of Indonesia" but in retrospect I feel I might need to turn that one into a disambiguation page and then make a separate article for both chief justices. Does that sound more accurate? MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:47, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
I removed the PROD tag from this article, because my understanding is that the requirement that an article can be only PRODded once is intended to be strictly interpreted. However, I will nominate the article for WP:AFD. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
re: 张园集会
I want to useify it so that I can make an attempt to merge the content to the corresponding article on Chinese Wikiedpa. SYSS Mouse (talk) 01:33, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- @SYSS Mouse: Done, it is now available at User:SYSS Mouse/张园集会. - HyperGaruda (talk) 02:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
فريد شهابFarid Chehab
You HyperGaruda deleted my article on فريد شهابFarid Chehab with speedy deletion because you claimed it is copied from another website and you dont even read or understand arabic as your profile say! it took me 5 hours to prepare this article and you deleted it in no time without even giving me the chance to have a look and defend myself. Yes there was a part that was copied, but you have to know that this part was Governmental Official Document that have been leaked and It was very important to keep them as they are without any changes. I clearly mentioned that in the article. And the website you claimed I copied it from is nothing but a news agency copying from a newspaper.
Is there any way to reverse that deletion and bring back the article I wrote. It is my first article by the way, and you made me very discouraged now.
Alikhandro.farhat (talk) 00:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Alikhandro.farhat: I am sorry if you have been discouraged from editing on Wikipedia, but the rules concerning copy-pasting are very strict for legal reasons. I am sufficiently able to read Arabic in order to follow what it is about, and it does not take a genius to compare one text to another (Please be aware that en.wikipedia.org is the English Wikipedia and that pages in other languages have no place here). Since you are admitting here that the text was copied, I do not think that a request for undeletion has much chance, but you could always try at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion or ask the admin who deleted the article (Maile66) to email you a copy for personal use. - HyperGaruda (talk) 08:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- @HyperGaruda: I am not sure if you are stubborn or stupid, but I am sure you don't understand Arabic, and maybe not even English. Please stop acting as a smartarse. I very well explained that the only the section of the "leaked official governmental documents" (which should not be paraphrased under any circumstance and should be copied at they are without any edits) were copied, which I believe makes sense. You don't expect WikiLeaks to paraphrase the leaked documents they publish, do you? In the article that I created, I already explained that very explicitly. The speedy deletion didn't give me a chance to at least edit the page by italicizing the "official governmental texts" or putting them in brackets, or even maybe delete the whole section of the "leaked official governmental documents". Next time, your policeman hormones erupt and you decide to report/tag a page for a speedy deletion, do take a breathe and at least request a change or a review before you act. In any case, it would be great if I got a copy of the article, so I can edit it and re-publish it in Arabic Wikipedia. - Alikhandro.farhat (talk) 09:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
If this will be the denominations page, the list of the Schools of Islamic theology does not belong here since they are not the denominations of Islam. 212.253.113.70 (talk) 13:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Batiniyya
Since you've checked the sources for Batiniyya, you may also be interested in reviewing related content in Schools of Islamic theology. Eperoton (talk) 16:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islamic schools and branches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Muslim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Following
Hey, you must be clearly following my edits. Is there any reason for it? Am I wrong? --Mhhossein talk 12:32, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: I see that you've reverted my tagging of Black Friday (and found a reference), is that what you are talking about? For your information, I was reading through the article about the game 1979 Revolution: Black Friday, because they were talking about it on the radio yesterday. Going from there to the actual day is not that big of a surprise, considering the hatnote. --HyperGaruda (talk) 15:00, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Several similar cases have occurred till now; You edit articles where you had never been, just after I edit that article. I have no problem with that and I know that you're not violating any policies, but I don't mind to know if there's any reasoning behind it. Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 16:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Are you seeking something by following (let's not say hounding) me? --Mhhossein talk 17:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- I have become rather concerned about your tendentious editing in topics regarding Shias/Iranians vs others, such as Wahhabis, Sunnis, and the West. So yes, I will from time to time check your edits (per WP:HOUND's exception "fixing ... violations of Wikipedia policy") if it looks like they demonise those others. There, it's out. Can we continue now... --HyperGaruda (talk) 17:46, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Now you should have enough proofs showing my "tendentious editing"! or, as you know, the outcome will not be that suitable. What you just called "WP:HOUND's exception" seems harassing to my eyes. Perhaps you need to be as objective as possible. I know, that's not easy. --Mhhossein talk 05:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- I have become rather concerned about your tendentious editing in topics regarding Shias/Iranians vs others, such as Wahhabis, Sunnis, and the West. So yes, I will from time to time check your edits (per WP:HOUND's exception "fixing ... violations of Wikipedia policy") if it looks like they demonise those others. There, it's out. Can we continue now... --HyperGaruda (talk) 17:46, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Are you seeking something by following (let's not say hounding) me? --Mhhossein talk 17:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Several similar cases have occurred till now; You edit articles where you had never been, just after I edit that article. I have no problem with that and I know that you're not violating any policies, but I don't mind to know if there's any reasoning behind it. Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 16:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Orphan Tag
Dear User:HyperGaruda can you please remove orphan tag from article Kasha Mann as it seems there are 3 other wiki articles found linked to this article. Is it right time to remove orphan tag? Mindcap (talk) 05:46, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Dear @Mindcap: according to WP:Orphan#Criteria, there is actually only 1 incoming link from List of R&B musicians (the other ones are disambiguation and redirect pages and do not count as incoming links), but that is all it takes to de-orphan Kasha Mann. So yes, time to remove it ;) --HyperGaruda (talk) 09:41, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- @HyperGaruda: Thanks Dear.
Déjà vu
The Turkish IP hopper is back, as oblivious of WP policies as ever. Now trying to resuscitate the epic OR violation at Batiniyya. Eperoton (talk) 03:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Eperoton: Thanks, I'll keep an eye on the IP and related pages. --HyperGaruda (talk) 09:02, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
G5 speedy
I didn't realize "Social class in the Muslim world", under delete discussion here [2], was a sure thing speedy delete. If you want to request speedy delete I can support this decision, and I can self-close the AfD. What do you think? Steve Quinn (talk) 01:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Actually I can request an Admin do this over at ANI. What is your opinion on that? Steve Quinn (talk) 01:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
I went ahead and requested over at ANI [3]. Steve Quinn (talk) 02:34, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Al-Baqi', you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shirk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 04:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Invitation from Wikipedia Asian Month 2016
Racist statement
Hello. I need your help about an anonymous user who wrote a message in my talk page which I deem very racist and derogatory. This is what he said:
I have reverted my talk page. If you want to see it, you can just check the old revision of the talk page. Cheers. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 11:05, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Calvin Wisanto: while it is not nice to call people like that, I do not think that there is much that can be done. It is only one comment, and due to the IP's bad grasp of English, it is not entirely clear what the IP meant to say. --HyperGaruda (talk) 20:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Still though, I felt really offended as an Indonesian since the IP use the word "indon", which contains a really negative meaning for us Indonesian. Also, he also insulted the people of Malaysia by calling them "malingsial" which literally means "pesky thief". Cheers. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 08:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted article
Hey you just sent me an email saying that my article was deleted. It was the Karamoko Kader Dembele one. I started my article before the one that right now is up. I was wondering if you guys can restore my article and mark it as mergin.
Have a nice day.Felipe delgado guizar (talk) 14:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Felipe delgado guizar. For such a request you should contact the admin who deleted Karamoko" Kader" Dembele, which in this case would be Anthony Appleyard. --HyperGaruda (talk) 20:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- The reason for deletion was A10: "Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic", in this case Karamoko Dembele. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:40, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
You have made a change to the title of Data Driven Instruction to "Data Drive Instruction". This revised title does not make sense in the context of the contents of the article which references a specific idea and practice in education. Please change the title back to Data Driven Instruction. Thank you! [ianwiki.edu] Francisredmon (talk) 20:28, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Francisredmon: Oops, I forgot an "n". Thanks for notifying. I am however maintaining the non-capitalized version, because we have rules regarding that, as you can read at WP:CAPITALIZATION. --HyperGaruda (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thank you Francisredmon (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, HyperGaruda. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello. In the article Sam Ratulangi International Airport, some anonymous account keeps adding new destinations that I have proven does not exist. Therefore, I have reverted his edits. However, he keeps editing the article. Moreover, he also keeps insulting me, by calling me with very derogatory words. I need your help to solve this issue. Cheers. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 08:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Calvin Wisanto: hi, please remember that I am not an administrator, so I don't have the power to do more than you do. Vandals should be reported to WP:ANV (or WP:AN3RR if the vandalism involves edit warring), while cases of uncivil behaviour go to WP:ANI. I will do this for you now (see WP:ANI#118.137.145.191, an uncivil and edit-warring user), but you can also do this yourself if you experience this in the future. --HyperGaruda (talk) 09:12, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Kepompong for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kepompong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kepompong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArdiPras95 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
reliable source
i'd like to know whether chinadaily is a reliable source for reference? what is the standard for RELIABLE? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twinklestellar (talk • contribs) 15:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Twinklestellar: Hi, please take a look at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. From what I can tell, China Daily is a reliable source. The main problem you have at Jason Zhang, however, is not the quality of the sources, but the lack of references to those sources. Help:Referencing for beginners is a guide that should help you with proper referencing. Oh, and please do not use Chinese text here, because en.wikipedia.org is written in English. --HyperGaruda (talk) 19:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
how to add an icon in the table
how to add an icon in the table,like a flag? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twinklestellar (talk • contribs) 03:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Twinklestellar: Don't add flags, see WP:NOICONS. --HyperGaruda (talk) 05:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Indonesian spelling
Please note you are welcome to join in the discussion for the proposal about spelling to be ratified (about 8 years after it was thought about) - trust your festival season has been a good one - and hope to see your comments at the page - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Indonesia - thanks JarrahTree 00:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
You may be interested...
in WP:Articles for deletion/List of Norwegian television series. Then again, you may not. Peridon (talk) 21:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about User:HyperGaruda. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |