Iron March moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Iron March, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. — InsertCleverPhraseHere 04:08, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hyperboreangiant, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Hyperboreangiant! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iron March (July 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Huon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Huon (talk) 21:28, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm C.Fred. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Iron March have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —C.Fred (talk) 01:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Draft:Iron March, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Meters (talk) 01:36, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nordic Resistance Movement, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — fortunavelut luna 08:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi#??? that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — fortunavelut luna 16:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Meters (talk) 19:18, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 19:19, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

August 2017

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 23:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply