I6156320

Feedback on your article

Hello I6156320, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.

• Intro sentence: needs some improvements. It should start with: ... is a book ... Please don not use abbreviations.
• Links: okay
• Headers: Too many! You use too many sub-headers: under each header normally are minimal three paragraphs, before can be thought about a sub-header. Please keep in mind, in the context section is described everything what happened in relation ship to the book what happened before the book was published, in the reception section should be about what happened after the publication of the book.
• References: A good start, but more are needed. Every paragraph and every two/three sentences should have a reference.
• Context/timeframe: A good start! But please without the headers. The things you would like to describe under "View on disabilities today" should be in the section "Reception".
• How was the book received: missing! In this section I expect to read about how the book was received, what people thought of it, how it was used, how the perspective of the book is different from modern views, etc.
• Other: Please keep in mind that the part about the contents of the book should be maximum one third of the article.
• Ready to publish: not yet, fixes and expansion are needed.

I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before your final version. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 13:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)