IAreggano

Hey there friends! How is everybody? I'm glad I can be a part of this budding community and will help in anyway I can!

IAreggano, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi IAreggano! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 19:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Santa Monica High School. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. CT Cooper · talk 21:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, I'm EricEnfermero. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Donald Trump has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. EricEnfermero (Talk) 18:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Santa Monica High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GAB^Hello! 20:11, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you introduce jokes into articles. Please consider this your final warning in regards to recent edits on Donald Trump and Santa Monica High School. I recognise that some of your edits are constructive but they are outweighed by your other disruptive edits. Your apologies are loosing credibility as you don't seem to be learning from your mistakes. CT Cooper · talk 18:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)