ICBSeverywhere
A Special welcome to a friend!
Hello, ICBSeverywhere, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your most excellent contribution. I hope you like the place and decide to stay...but if not, I did enjoy your brief company. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!; Regards,--scuro (talk) 05:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
TI
editI would like to make a suggestion. If you feel that the TI got it wrong please provide studies that show it. If you can find a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials that show effectiveness and safety beyond two to three years I would be more then happy to look at them.
Here is a 2002 study Schachter HM, Pham B, King J, Langford S, Moher D (2001). "How efficacious and safe is short-acting methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit disorder in children and adolescents? A meta-analysis". CMAJ. 165 (11): 1475–88. PMC 81663. PMID 11762571. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Cheers Doc James (talk) 11:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- A 2002 study that was published in 2001? Interesting.
- I will not waste my time defending a claim that I did not make.
- I pointed out that your source is not valid. It is your responsibility to defend that source, not mine to prove it wrong.
- The TI is a selective opinion piece. It is NOT a peer-reviewed literature review, despite your assertion that it is.
- Those are the statements that I am willing to spend my time defending.
- Regarding your arguments over statements, I am not currently a part of that discussion and I will not be pushed into it. If I choose to join in, you are welcome to ask me to defend THOSE statements. ICBSeverywhere (talk) 19:50, 23 November 2008 (UTC)