IP49XX

Please do not vandalise my talk page

You made a number of assertions on my talk page that have nothing to do with me personally, but rather the contents of the Doping in China page. Please do not do so again.

Your tone on my page was extremely defamatory and your arguments are quite frankly, unintelligent.

1. You reverted all my changes, unintentionally or not, and therefore the onus is on you to execute whatever changes you want to see on the correct version. By doing so, you allowed a host of accusations that violated WP:NPOV and WP:Verifiability to stand uncontested. You thus wrecked all my changes thoughtlessly, wasting my time, and allowed the defamatory content to remain.

2. You claim that my tone is not neutral. You have not cited specific instances where my edits lack objectivity.

3. Please do not blame me when your edits are lost. That other editors mass revert to non-neutral version of the article, with the result that your amendments are lost, has nothing to do with me, but rather with them. Get that straight in your head.

4. This article itself is highly defamatory of the Chinese people, containing dead links, representing opinions as facts, and unsourced material. MingScribe1368 (talk) 03:40, 7 August 2024 (UTC) MingScribe1368 (talk) 03:43, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

I assure you I didn't even see your edits. I was adding only my own and clicked publish. I didn't expect it to override your edits that was not even in my awareness. It was not deliberate. And I didn't intend to make extensive changes to the article. My goal was to add specific, factual info that shouldn't be controversial or remove errors.[1][2]. However, your frequent and substantial edits are causing frustration among other editors, leading them to revert everything to what they consider a neutral version, erasing my contributions as well. Your approach to editing is problematic and will continually face opposition unless you work towards consensus, even with editors who might have biases. If you don't adjust your approach, you risk being suspended from editing this article. This isn't about the correctness of your edits but about your ability to collaborate effectively. IP49XX (talk) 03:49, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

I actually agree with the pragmatism embodied in the later part of the statement above. I seriously, however, find the term "wrecking ball" extremely offensive, as well as the accusation of "bias". Whatever. I don't care.

All I can say is if there are other people who have detected the bias on the Doping in China page, as well as the host of issues regarding WP:NPOV and WP:Verifiability, they are definitely not stepping up to the plate and doing an extremely slow and poor job of fixing discrimination against the Chinese people, even when facts are on their side. MingScribe1368 (talk) 03:54, 7 August 2024 (UTC)