July 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Big Bang Theory (season 6) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


I believe that this was a false positive error made by Cluebot and I have reported it as such. Your edit was not vandalism, although you may need to keep levels of detail into perspective. Just because you can add more detail to a plot description does not mean you should. Bilorv (Talk)(Contribs) 21:17, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edit

edit

You recently made an edit to The Big Bang Theory (season 7) and removed some information without explaining why. In future, please use edit summaries so other editors can understand the reasoning behind your change. I have reverted your change as I was the one who originally added that information and feel it is a valid piece of detail in the article. However, if you wish to remove the content again with a valid edit summary, please do so. If you feel like your change might be controversial or disputed, you can discuss why you want to remove the content on this page, on my talk page or the article's talk page. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. If you have any concerns or questions, click on the (Talk) link in my signature and create a new section with whatever you want to say. Bilorv (Talk)(Contribs) 21:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Big Bang Theory (season 7). Stop expanding the episode summary. You are just adding insignificant detail to the plot, creating WP:PLOTBLOAT. Do not add again without first starting a discussion on the article's talk page for why it is oh so "EXTREMELY" crucial this info is stated. Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at The Big Bang Theory (season 7) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. AussieLegend () 03:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply