IamPersistent

Associated Acts

I got the following from Template:Infobox musical artist, it states that one shared member does NOT constitute an associated act. There are many instances across Wikipedia, as you stated, where too many associated acts are listed. I remember trying to clean up the acts in the Red Hot Chili Peppers infobox a while back, but gave up because people just kept adding them back!......

"This field is for professional relationships with other musicians or bands that are significant and notable to this artist's career.

This field can include, for example, any of the following: For individuals: groups of which he or she has been a member, Other acts with which this act has collaborated on multiple occasions, or on an album, or toured with as a single collaboration act playing together, Groups which have spun off from this group, A group from which this group has spun off.

The following uses of this field should be avoided: Association of groups with members' solo careers, Groups with only one member in common, Association of producers, managers, etc. (who are themselves acts) with other acts (unless the act essentially belongs to the producer, as in the case of a studio orchestra formed by and working exclusively with a producer), One-time collaboration for a single, or on a single song, Groups that are merely similar"

Hope this helps.Thegraciousfew (talk) 06:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark White (bassist) has been accepted

Mark White (bassist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Winner 42 Talk to me! 13:28, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Local 717 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Local 717, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 18:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Local 717

Hello, IamPersistent. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Local 717".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Mjs1991 (talk) 05:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)