Your submission at Articles for creation: Republic of China (Taiwan) (April 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 14:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ian0421! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 14:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

And if you wish to rework an article use the sandbox and post a link, you do not copy and paste the whole article into talk. Slatersteven (talk) 15:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Note as well that resubmitting this every time it is rejected may not go well, and might be seen as wp:disruption. Slatersteven (talk) 15:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Taiwan

edit

If you have an edit request, please say specifically what those edits are rather than posting the whole 330k of the article to the talk page with (I assume) some edits made to its text somewhere. Thanks! Belbury (talk) 15:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Republic of China (Taiwan) (April 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please do not submit a draft on a subject which already exists in the main space, develop that article instead. I'm rejecting this to prevent further resumission.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
If you wish to develop the article on Taiwan, you do that by editing the live article directly. I have rejected this draft to stop you resubmitting it, as this is not the way to make or request changes to existing articles, and also because we couldn't have more than one article on any given subject. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Language

edit

This is the English language wiki, if you wish to communicate here please write English. Slatersteven (talk) 15:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

And please read wp:cir, continuing to post none English content might be also seen as disruptive. Slatersteven (talk) 16:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

April 2024

edit

  Welcome, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Republic of China (Taiwan)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Draft:Republic of China (Taiwan) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

subject already exists in main space

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Isaidnoway (talk) 12:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

July 2024

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Yasuke, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. If you think an information is wrong, discuss it on the talk page and build a consensus. It's going to be hard, knowing it's about Yasuke. Neocorelight (Talk) 23:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

he not a 侍 foreigner dont us history asian not owe black people Ian0421 (talk) 23:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
he not a 侍 foreigner dont change us history asian not owe black people Ian0421 (talk) 23:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
No offense, but you're sadly not going to win your argument if you're not skilled enough in English. Neocorelight (Talk) 02:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
What is your evidence that Yasuke was considered a samurai though? Kidini FR (talk) 06:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Fortunately for me I don't engage in that debate. But you should. Neocorelight (Talk) 07:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Dude, you asked Ian to talk with you about it and why you're asked about it you say you don't want to talk about it?
If you don't have any evidence of it, stop trying to impose it as a fact.
Stay factual. Kidini FR (talk) 07:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I didn't ask Ian to talk with me, I advised him to go to Yasuke's talk page. I don't care one bit about Yasuke. Neocorelight (Talk) 07:17, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
thomas lockley 一個白癡白人創作的偽歷史 Ian0421 (talk) 19:59, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply