IanThePineapple

December 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kerbal Space Program has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kerbal Space Program was changed by IanThePineapple (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907596 on 2015-12-10T00:46:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sapphire Rapids (microarchitecture)

The article Sapphire Rapids (microarchitecture) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON not enough details available at present.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 01:07, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Liftoff of the Electron Rocket.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Liftoff of the Electron Rocket.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello, I'm Tarl N.. Your recent edit to the page Saturn V appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tarl N. (discuss) 03:30, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Per WP:BRD (click on the link and read it) please take this to the talk page rather than just blindly re-introducing the change. Tarl N. (discuss) 01:37, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Further, please read WP:RS. forums.nasaspaceflight.com is not a reliable source by our definitions. Tarl N. (discuss) 01:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Copied from my talk page to here, to respond where the discussion is already present:

---

The sources that I linked to are reliable. One source (James (Lockheed)) got the information he provided from people at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center. The other, Ed Kyle, runs http://www.spacelaunchreport.com/, and he knows far more about historical spaceflight than I ever will. The original source in the article is the only one I've ever seen that says that S-IVB-500F in on display at KSC.

Also, there are only two S-IVBs at KSC, 514 and 209 (I've seen both in person). 514 is part the display Saturn V, while 209 is on the Saturn IB at the visitors center. The Saturn V page contradicts itself with that (it says both 514 and 500F are on display at KSC, which simply isn't true). It also says further down that 514 is part of the Saturn V on display, and quotes a source from NASA.

References

• 1. https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=6263.msg104353#msg104353
• 2. https://www.drewexmachina.com/2016/09/23/the-saturn-500f-the-moon-rocket-that-couldnt-fly/
• 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SA-500F
• 4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-IVB
• 5. https://www.johnweeks.com/spacecraft/saturn_v_ksc_3.html

---

The quality of the personage you think might be making the statement is not in question. Please read WP:RS. A reliable source, for purposes of this encyclopedia, is a secondary or tertiary source (see WP:SECONDARY), with some kind of editorial control over the content. Any statement made by a single individual outside of such constructs is a primary source (see WP:PRIMARY), and for practical purposes not usable here. Even if identity is authenticated. Blogs in general are precluded as references.

Wikipedia itself is never an acceptable reference. Among other reasons, see WP:CIRCULAR.

The issue with your edit is that we do have a source (which meets our requirements for reliability) which says that the 3rd stage of 500F is at Kennedy. You sought to change that with sources we cannot accept. Tarl N. (discuss) 03:25, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

On a separate issue, some further commentary:

• If your edits are reverted, per policy of WP:BRD, you must discuss the edit on the talk page of the article before re-instating it. Simply putting the edit back is the beginning of an edit war, please read WP:3RR as to where that leads. Do note that you aren't safe if you revert fewer than three times, that's simply the red line which mandates being blocked.
• When writing on a talk page, please always end your comments with a quadruple tilde (~~~~). Wikipedia will replace those characters with a signature from you which will include a timestamp, your name and some links. These are essential for people and automated tools to figure out what comments came from whom and when. Please read the WP:TALK policies.
• When using the {{talkback}} template, you place your own username inside the curly braces. That sends me an email to check your talk page.

As for the overall issue with Saturn V pieces, you may indeed be correct that the wrong information is in the article. But you cannot correct it by simply stating "I know better", or pointing to a blog posting where someone else says "it's really xyz". You need more definitive documentation. Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 03:38, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, IanThePineapple. Thank you for your work on UVEX. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Minotaur VI for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minotaur VI is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minotaur VI until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 14:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)