User talk:Ibansis

General sanctions alert: Assyrian, Chaldean, Aramean, and Syriac topics

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in Assyrian, Chaldean, Aramean, and Syriac identity, culture, and politics. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:20, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Arameans

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Arameans, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:32, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

SPI case

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wlaak. Thank you. Shmayo (talk) 12:36, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Aramean continuity

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Aramean continuity has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibited one or more of the following signs which indicated that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:

• Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
• Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
• Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.

Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. — Newslinger talk 18:08, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Logged warning for LLM misuse in WP:GS/ACAS

Hi Ibansis, a recently closed SPI case found that you have used a large language model (LLM) to generate the Draft:Aramean continuity page, which I speedily deleted on 2 April per criterion G15. Additionally, you have used an LLM to make the edit Special:Diff/1346613901 on the article Arameans; although you attempted to correct "reference errors" in the subsequent edit Special:Diff/1346624527, the correction did not address multiple references that still contained invalid information. Please understand that the guideline on LLM-generated article content (WP:LLM) states that "the use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited", with only two exceptions listed in the guideline.

This message is a warning for LLM misuse within the WP:GS/ACAS ("Assyrian, Chaldean, Aramean, and Syriac identity, culture, and politics") contentious topic, and has been recorded on the designated log. Please ensure that your future edits adhere to site guidelines regarding LLM use. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 09:17, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

You appear to be engaged in an edit war at Shamoun Hanne Haydo. An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly revert each other's changes. Please do not revert or undo the edits made by other editors when your changes are reverted. Instead, use the talk page to discuss how the page can represent consensus among the editors involved. Here is some advice on how to do this. If discussions get stuck, you can request a third opinion, ask for help at a relevant noticeboard, or seek dispute resolution.

Edit warring can result in being blocked from editing, especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts within 24 hours on one page. Undoing any other editor's work, in whole or in part, involving the same or different material, is a revert. You can still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not violate the three-revert rule should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 21:30, 10 August 2026 (UTC)