Your submission at Articles for creation: Tommy Ahlquist (March 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Antonioatrylia was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Antonioatrylia (talk) 00:44, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Iblotter, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Antonioatrylia (talk) 00:44, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tommy Ahlquist (March 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yash! was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Yash talk stalk 19:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tommy Ahlquist (March 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 20:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tommy Ahlquist (April 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 22:05, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tommy Ahlquist (May 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 18:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

June 2017

edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Main Page. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 19:58, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Thomas "Tommy" Ahlquist III has been accepted

edit
 
John Thomas "Tommy" Ahlquist III, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 02:41, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Home Lander. I noticed that in this edit to Tommy Ahlquist, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 19:29, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply