User talk:Icheelee/sandbox

Article Evaluation

1) Everything in the article are related to one another. However, there is one part of the article that had distracted me and that is that the last half of the paragraph under my artist's Life and Work was bolded unnecessarily. 2) The article maintained a neutral position. 3) There are not a lot of information regarding my artist's background and artworks. 4) The citation links works, however, under External Links, 3 links that were provided did not work. 5) Yes, the facts presented in the article are referenced with reliable references. 6) No, most of the information are up to date. If possible, I would like to expand on the background information and also more on his art pieces and how it affects the LGBT community. 7) The talk page of the article seems to talk more about expanding the artist's background information. 8) The article is under Wikiproject Biography and Wikiproject LGBT studies. 9) Wikipedia gives a more in-depth information about the artist compared to in class lecture where most of the information are condensed or omitted. Icheelee (talk) 19:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)