Welcome
edit
|
Speedy deletion declined: Nirmal Kumar Ganguly
editHello Ichgab. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nirmal Kumar Ganguly, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 15:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC) Going by your logic every official in every country should have a wikipage devoted. very nice od youIchgab (talk) 18:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- (edit conflict):Please do no longer nominate this article for speedy deletion. Doing that is disruptive and you will likely be blocked if you keep adding speedy deletion tags after they have been removed multiple times. Please don't confuse significance and notability. Speedy deletion is only about significance, i.e. making an exceptional claim in the article. This has been done by stating that NK Ganguly is president of some notable research institution. Whether he himself is notable enough is something different and should be debated at Articles for deletion or by simply proposing a deletion. But speedy deletion is certainly not applicable here. De728631 (talk) 19:37, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nirmal Kumar Ganguly. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Do not add speedy deletion tags again. NeilN talk to me 19:36, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Read WP:BOOMERANG
editPlease read the essay WP:BOOMERANG. Your report to WP:ANI, complaining about removal of speedy deletion tags, when you were being disruptive by reapplying the tags after they were removed, risks sanctions against you. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:02, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
editYou may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nirmal Kumar Ganguly. Any further attempts to add delete tags will be reported to WP:ANI NeilN talk to me 09:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)