I can hide my authorship of the rebuses, but people need to know what the real rebuses. I was very disappointed by your attempts to limit the intellectual progress of people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Airevgeny (talk • contribs) 22:04, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Except those aren't real rebuses. If you can show an example of that apostrophe-letter-deletion code or that letter-swapping thing as a standard rebus system from something other than your own work, then it's fine. But I've seen a lot of rebuses and I haven't once seen it other than your logic puzzles. And you're not supposed to hide your authorship. You're not supposed to contribute anything that you created yourself. Look at Wikipedia:No_original_research. --Idran (talk) 03:02, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
This is not my logic, the logic rebuses of all. See thousands of similar examples here: [1] In order not to violate the copyrights of the owners of these pictures, I made examples of rebuses themselves. Similar examples of rebuses exist in Wikipedia in other languages.
Sorry, but I am inclined to regard your actions as vandalism and ready to defend his innocence in any Institute
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Rebuses, you may be blocked from editing.