Igrek
Welcome!
Hello, Igrek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --FlammingoHey 13:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
edit
|
The Modest Barnstar | |
| Thanks for your recent contributions! -129.49.72.78 (talk) 19:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC) |
Vital articles
editHave you checked out the discussions on the size and scope of the Vital article projects we're having at Wikipedia talk:Vital articles, Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Expanded and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Vital Articles? Since you once were one of the most prolific editors in that area, your thoughts would be appreciated pbp 14:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for invitation. I have plan to make new version of m:List of articles every Wikipedia should have (I work with my version now) and then to start work with Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Expanded. --Igrek (talk) 10:47, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
- Igrek, I am very appreciative of your input in the vital articles discussion's, you have proposed many good new ideas. I would urge you to look also at the previous proposals for adds, removals and swaps. I know there are loads but we have so few users taking part, it would be great to get another user's opinions on the existing discussions. If you support or oppose any of the proposals it would be great for us to know. Carlwev (talk) 23:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- OK. --Igrek (talk) 19:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- Igrek, I am very appreciative of your input in the vital articles discussion's, you have proposed many good new ideas. I would urge you to look also at the previous proposals for adds, removals and swaps. I know there are loads but we have so few users taking part, it would be great to get another user's opinions on the existing discussions. If you support or oppose any of the proposals it would be great for us to know. Carlwev (talk) 23:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Vital Articles/Expanded
editGreetings, Igrek. I am glad to see the interest that you are taking in the Vital Articles lists again. The project really needs the participation of educated, well-read and literate editors, with eclectic interests, such as yourself. By necessity, we must remove more VA/E list topics than we add for the time being, because the VA/E list currently exceeds its limit of 10,000 articles by over 300 topics. It would be helpful if you could scour the various sublists for lower-priority topics that are likely candidates for removal. Until we get the total under 10,000 again, the easiest way to add new higher-priority subjects to the list is to propose a swap with a specific lower-priority subject that is a likely candidate for removal. Regards, Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Greetings, Dirtlawyer1. What do you mean by "scour the various sublists for lower-priority topics that are likely candidates for removal"? --Igrek (talk) 11:24, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Igrek, the VA/E list is currently 300+ articles over its limit of 10,000 articles. Our first goal is to identify and remove 300 lower-priority (less vital?) articles currently on the list. That involves going through all of the 12 component sublists and identifying those articles that are likely candidates to be removed, and proposing them for removal at the main VA/E talk page. I identified about 30 yesterday and posted them for discussion, but that's obviously just a start. I think we have something like 50 or so pending removals at the talk page; that's only about 20% of what needs to be removed. The 12 component lists for the Vital Articles/Expanded project are linked here. 11:57, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- We all are doing it. For my opinion, we must close old discussion before starting new 300-600 discussions. I want to check of the sublists size by program and to start discussion about size of each sublist before new discussions.--Igrek (talk) 12:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I was not suggesting we should have 300+ open topic discussions at the same time! It's already like herding cats to keep the discussion relatively organized. LOL Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:15, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- We all are doing it. For my opinion, we must close old discussion before starting new 300-600 discussions. I want to check of the sublists size by program and to start discussion about size of each sublist before new discussions.--Igrek (talk) 12:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Igrek, the VA/E list is currently 300+ articles over its limit of 10,000 articles. Our first goal is to identify and remove 300 lower-priority (less vital?) articles currently on the list. That involves going through all of the 12 component sublists and identifying those articles that are likely candidates to be removed, and proposing them for removal at the main VA/E talk page. I identified about 30 yesterday and posted them for discussion, but that's obviously just a start. I think we have something like 50 or so pending removals at the talk page; that's only about 20% of what needs to be removed. The 12 component lists for the Vital Articles/Expanded project are linked here. 11:57, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Igrek. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Igrek. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)