Ijifjsfioweief

September 2021

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that in this edit to John von Neumann, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SunDawntalk 03:27, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello -- your latest edit edit to John von Neumann modifies a direct quote; is that what you meant to do? I checked the source text "The Computer from Pascal to Von Neumann" (Goldstine 1980, pp. 167) and the text you added is not present in the quote.

We could add "something that not even Albert Einstein nor the greatest scientists of the 20 century could do" as long as it is added outside of the source quote -- do you have a reference to the enciclopedia Britanica which we can use for that statement? Cstanford.math (talk) 15:54, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to John von Neumann. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:38, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at John von Neumann. Favonian (talk) 17:40, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 17:42, 23 September 2021 (UTC)