Iloverussia

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Iloverussia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 72Dino (talk) 14:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Nuclear arms race, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 07:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Nuclear arms race. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AV3000 (talk) 13:42, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Nuclear arms race shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. AV3000 (talk) 13:44, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Your edits of Soviet award articles

Why are you changing USSR for Soviet Union? CCCP translates into USSR -NOT- into Soviet Union. The terms are taken directly from Soviet decrees, these decrees say "CCCP" (USSR) -NOT- Советский Союз. The aim of articles is to give EXACT DATA, not perceptions. The medals and decrees contain "CCCP" -NOT- Советский Союз. I would be grateful if you ceased skewing the data. Thank you. Fdutil (talk) 22:51, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

some comments on your edits

Hello,

a) please provide an edit summary to your edits.

b) when you move a page, it is usually a good idea to discuss this on its talk page. There is also a template for proposing a move, which allows other editors to comment.

c) Soviet Union -> USSR (or vice versa) is considered a trivial change. If you would like to perform a massive trivial change, you need to gain consensus first. Eg discuss it at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Russia.

Best regards, Sasha (talk) 15:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

re Willis Tower

Sorry for reverting you before; I had misunderstood what you were changing. Yes, of course those should be 442. --Golbez (talk) 05:50, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Nigel Ish. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mikoyan MiG-29M, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nigel Ish (talk) 09:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Hello, I'm GenQuest. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Park Geun-hye because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 21:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Park Geun-hye. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 05:41, 24 March 2013 (UTC) your edit is vandalism.--Iloverussia (talk) 05:44, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Park Geun-hye

Your recent editing history at Park Geun-hye shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 05:53, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Park Geun-hye. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bbb23 (talk) 17:40, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Soviet stockpile

Thanks for that. Looks like that error has been in the article since I failed to correctly fix that vandalism back in December. I checked through a number of articles and our source for the number goes back to a Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists article that is no longer online. File talk:US and USSR nuclear stockpiles.svg Rmhermen (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Wrong link. Should be: [[1]] Rmhermen (talk) 03:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Park Geun-hye

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Park Geun-hye, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Keri (talk) 16:55, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Nancy Stafford

Please see WP:CAT/R. In a nutshell, "religious beliefs of a living person should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief." And should be well sourced. Also see WP:BRD. I see that you have already been blocked for edit warring. I'm sure you don't want to go down that road again. --Musdan77 (talk) 04:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Park Geun-hye portrait

Please do not remove or edit photographs from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Park Geun-hye, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ajw522 (talk) 21:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Verification that Edward Snowden worked for CIA and NSA

iloverussua I assume this is a good faith edit but references provide what Edward Snowdem said or published and are not credible verificati</ref> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patroit22 (talk • contribs) 03:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Sorry -signature did not recordPatroit22 (talk) 03:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Please support your edit position by replying.Patroit22 (talk) 02:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

USSR or Soviet Union

Iloverussia- I trust this is a good faith reversal rather than edit warring but USSR was the official name rather than Soviet Union at this date and reversal from the former entry appears to be trivial.Please honor Wikipedia standards,Patroit22 (talk) 20:58, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Civil use of Talk

I have sent legitimate questions to edits and received no response. Why?Patroit22 (talk) 22:57, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Moscow, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --    L o g  X   21:40, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Chinese

I reverted your edit with an explanation: Undid revision 584081831 by Iloverussia (talk) A similar edit was revert on October 26 with the editsummary "1.2 billion is the entire population of China; not all of it is Han Chinese". Why did you undo my revert without bringing any reply or sources? Debresser (talk) 22:45, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of the Soviet Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stagnation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Nationality

Hi! Your edit on Itō Hirobumi was simply wrong. When talking about someone's nationality, it should be the name of the country where s/he belongs. See Osamu Shimomura and Yoichiro Nambu and think about the difference of their nationality. If you disagree with me, please ask at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language‎. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 07:45, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

May 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Xi Jinping. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please discuss this on the article's talk page  Philg88 ^♦talk 15:55, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geography of the Soviet Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dezhnev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)