April 2020

edit

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Nazia Hassan. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jeppiz (talk) 20:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yes but i also remove my edits.

Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 21:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Urdu, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

OK

ImMuslimandimnotaterrorist, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi ImMuslimandimnotaterrorist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 21 April 2020 (UTC)


April 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lashkar-e-Taiba, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. That edit does not do justice to your user name! Kautilya3 (talk) 12:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I am so sorry for that, but you don't change Indian English to Commonwealth English on Urdu article ImMuslimandimnotaterrorist, and put my username like that, because i am not really a terrorist, i am not a biased person, i only belive on the truth religion. (talk) 12:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Re:Urdu

edit

Salaam User:ImMuslimandimnotaterrorist and Ramzan Mubarak! Thank you for your message on my talk page. Among the Central Indo-Aryan languages, Western Hindi is a grouping of related dialects, which includes Braj, Haryanvi, Bundeli, Kannauji, and Hindustani (Hindi-Urdu). This does not mean that Modern Standard Hindi and Modern Standard Urdu are dialects of one another; rather than are standard registers of Hindustani (Hindi-Urdu). Professor Afroz Taj of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill explains the history of Hindustani in this article very well. I would encourage you to have a look. Please be assured that I watch the Urdu article closely, so you can ensure that the article will remain reflective of an academic perspective on the language, as long as I am an editor on Wikipedia. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 00:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Walaikum Salaam ad Khair Mubarak, Urdu is also not completely a register of Hindustani, like Hindi, if Urdu is the language whos name was Hindustani and Hindustani is the name being used for the language spoken around the Delhi area from the 12th century onwards. After the onset of the Delhi Sultanate, this language got mixed with Persian vocabulary and spread throughout the subcontinent. It was written in the Nastaliq script in Deccan, and the written language came back to Delhi in the 19th century and eventually came to be called Urdu. so it should be written on Hindustani language article, not to Urdu article. ImMuslimandimnotaterrorist (talk) 07:56, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Language family also means proto-language Western Hindi is not proto-language of Urdu, basically in 1857 Urdu and English made official languages of British India, in 1900, Hindi granted equal status to Urdu in the United Provinces, in 1948, Urdu declared sole national language in Pakistan, and in 1950, Hindi granted separate status and official precedence over Urdu and all other languages in the Republic of India. Hindi is not a proto language for Urdu, bt both languages proto-language is Hindustani language. ImMuslimandimnotaterrorist (talk) 08:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Re: Old Urdu, please see WP:CONTENTFORK. – Thjarkur (talk) 01:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Username

edit

Hi, your username is unnecessarily inflammatory and I'd like to recommend that you head over to Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple to get a new one. – Thjarkur (talk) 01:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hindustani language, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Biased encyclopedia

edit

@Gotitbro, you make English Wikipedia, the biased encyclopedia, ok, i am not promoting my language and my country, but i am correcting the language details, the Indian director Kabir Khan, also said in an interview that Wikipedia is the biased website, i only want to explain that Many people in the subcontinent think that Urdu is a new language and Hindi is an old language in comparison. However, this is not the case at all. Although Urdu is not a very old language, Hindi is a brand new language and it has been difficult to come into existence for two hundred years. and you can not Lie the truth, okay, may you watch the film Kesari, The whole film was based on the past, and all the letters were written in Perso-Arabic (Urdu alphabet). your all films are proved that, Persian and then Urdu was the language of Indian subcontinent, Hindi granted equal status to Urdu in the United Provinces in 1900s, Hindi is not a old language in Urdu comparison, in 18th or 19th century Hindus argued that Urdu language, should written in Devanagari, and in 1881, Bihar accepted Devanagarised Urdu (Hindi), as there sole language, and Bihar was the first state which adopted the language, Hindi is the old name of Hindustani language, yes i know that The Urdu language was born in India. India was considered to be a golden sparrow in terms of its fertile land and man power. That’s why lots of invaders came to occupy it for different purposes. It so happened that when these different people from different regions of the world came to India they brought with them, among other things, their language as well. People like Arabs, Persians and Turks etc. when mingled with the native people they exchanged many words of their languages and thus with this mingling, a new language emerged which was termed Urdu, meaning the “language of the troops.” Since it was formed by the invaders of the Muslim world and emerged during the rule of the Mughals in India, it was termed as the language of the Muslims and that is why initially it was called Musalmani. yes i know that Urdu is called Hindi (because of the popularity of Hindi language). and it can be the dialect of Hindi, but, Hindi is not an old language in the comarison of Urdu, but in your eyes, Hindi is originated in 769 AD. Huh! Hahahahahaha!

The Britishs seen that Urdu (in that time Hindustani) is the developing language, that's why they divided the language, i like the user @User:Fowler&fowler, beause he made the truth statements on the article Hindustani, but unfortunately the statements were reverted, i don't want Wikipedia anymore, now i will watch ISPR documentaries, ok bye Allah Hafiz. - ImMuslimandimnotaterrorist (talk) 19:03, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


regional English on Urdu page

edit

i saw your comment about "Indian" vs "Commonwealth" English on the Urdu page, i was going to try to fix it, but i can't find the edits you refer to? Irtapil (talk) 22:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply