User talk:ImaginesTigers/Archives/2021/October

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:DMT biscuit submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

ImaginesTigers creates important and, by their hand, good articles. This editor has demonstrated a great inclination and willingness to support the website's blemishes. This nomination mostly follows their recent GA for Dracula – and their previous GA for The Odyssey. Both are two of history's most important pieces of literature - and until 'Tigers' involvement relative low points of Wikipedia. It's commendable, given the sheer scope of available information on those pieces of work, that they were able to correlate and compile a well-done collaborative article. He represents a type of valuable editor who should be celebrated more. They put it best: "I specialise in the improvement of high-importance, high-traffic, low-quality articles". Thankfully, with their involvement, they become high-quality articles. User:Gog the Mild heartily seconded this award as did User:Vami_IV who noted, "Tigers is, to boot, a helpful, kind, and supportive editor who helped me through a dark hour.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 12:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much to DMT biscuit for nominating me, and to everyone who echoed that support. I've had a hard few months and this was thoughtful and came at the perfect time. Thank you again. — ImaginesTigers (talk∙contribs) 18:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Hoping to get your feedback on F. Scott Fitzgerald article

Hello ImaginesTigers,

As you were very helpful with your critiques of The Great Gatsby article, I was hoping to get your feedback in the ongoing Peer Review of the F. Scott Fitzgerald article. Hal333 and I have only had one other editor provide feedback thus far, and we are hoping to kick the article into shape for a FAC nomination in the near future. Any and all criticism is welcome. — Flask (talk) 20:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC)