Imareaver

Welcome!

Hello, Imareaver, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Piandcompany (talk) 01:03, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

MIT and Economics

My opinion: It should not surprise anyone that a "tech" school like MIT has Nobel laureates in economics. I went to Caltech, and not only did our economists run models on supercomputers, the game theorists had a habit of putting test subjects in the MRI machine. Despite a history in the "social sciences", economics for a number of decades has been an increasingly technical field. As such, economists can often benefit from proximity to computing and mathematical resources, the best of which are frequently found at schools specializing in Math/Physics/Computer Science. Having neurobiologists around can also be a plus. And any tech school that wants its students to actually take social science classes, will tend to hire economics professors who are strong in math and modeling, as well as social theory.Elriana (talk) 20:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

I understand that. But I don't think every reader will, hence the use of the word "stereotypically." And that was just an example, I personally think that the sorting by type of prize is interesting in its own right. In any case, no one's proposed a better method that isn't as time-consuming as sorting by date of prize would be.Imareaver (talk) 22:54, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)