August 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Abasteraster. I noticed that you recently removed content from Christianity in Indonesia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Abasteraster (talk) 15:20, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello there, I understand that they put sources but the growth is not even real, in fact it’s the other way around, more Christians are converting to Islam, Christianity is more dying in Indonesia than actually growing, these sources are merely missionary propaganda which has been debunked, it doesn’t even make sense mathematically Imnotarealhumanhehe (talk) 15:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hey, I appreciate the enthusiasm, but you need to cite reliable sources to back up your argument so that other people can verify that what you're saying is true. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability for information on how to do so. Abasteraster (talk) 15:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Abasteraster Note that this specific contributor was already warned 2x for huge modifs in breach of NPOV less than 10 days ago. They blancked their UT since, but be aware that they are probably falling in the WP:NOTHERE cat. (1) (2)
Cordially, AgisdeSparte (talk) 20:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:M7MD22111 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/M7MD22111. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
--Blablubbs (talk) 10:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply