Ind knight

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ind knight! Thank you for your contributions. I am ind_knight and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

--Ind knight (talk) 05:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Digvijay Singh (politician)

I did read the entire article from rediff.com, and I didn't delete the sentence you added about Singh calling himself a better Hindu. Instead, I moved it to a more relevant section of the article. You can see this by reviewing the article's edit history and reading my edit summaries.

If you have a source that says Singh is a Christian, please add it to the article. Until then, I think we should leave the article Hinduism as Singh's religion. In the interest of neutrality.

Finally, when adding comments to a Talk page, please add your comments at the bottom of the page. Also, when possible, please link to the article you are writing about. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 06:51, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Nobody has said that his last name indicates that he's a Hindu. If you'd like, I can remove his religion altogether until somebody produces a source.

A suggestion: don't interpret what you think a source means. Stick to what it says in black and white. The rediff.com article doesn't say that Singh isn't a Hindu. What does Singh mean when he says he's a better Hindu than somebody else? It's not your place or mine to interpret that. We only report that he said it. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 07:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Javed Anand

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Javed Anand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ryan Vesey contribs 05:15, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Teesta Setalvad. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Bold text should only be used in accordance with our guidelines at MOS:CAPS but the main problem is that you are trying to emphasise certain portions of the article that agree with your point of view. Please don't do this again. Dougweller (talk) 06:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Pseudo-secularism, you may be blocked from editing. Dougweller (talk) 07:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Digvijay Singh (politician), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dougweller (talk) 13:22, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Another warning on Pseudo-secularism

First, we do not use blogs, Wikipedia articles, forums, etc. as sources. See WP:IRS and WP:VERIFY. Secondly, if you do find sources that meet our criteria, they must explicitly back your edit. And if you mention someone living, the sources need to be even more consistent with our policies and guidelines, often you must use multiple sources, and again they must back the statement explicitly. We take comments about living people extremely seriously and you will be blocked if you ignore our policies and guidelines. If you think your sources are reliable and back your statement you can ask for confirmation of this at WP:RSN. Dougweller (talk) 13:27, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

You keep text in contravention of multiple policies including WP:BLP, WP:V and WP:NPOV. You have also been alerted to these policies and processes to work with them. If you don't heed these warnings and continue with these type of edits, you are likely to be blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 12:07, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:K bstrd.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:K bstrd.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)