IndieLovePunk
September 2015
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Swimmers (band) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Swimmers (band) was changed by Swmrs (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912826 on 2015-09-04T03:08:25+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Swmrs, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
edit
|
Hi Swmrs!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
September 2015
edit Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Trivium (band) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Trivium (band) was changed by Swmrs (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897411 on 2015-09-06T03:18:26+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:18, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.
If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.
You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 12:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
IndieLovePunk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Changed username to acceptable name
Accept reason:
Following request. PhilKnight (talk) 21:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
IndieLovePunk (talk) 02:56, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Blessthefall, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Make them all the same or don't change any. The lack of uniformity is a problem. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Blessthefall. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.
returning to your preferred version is not appropriate. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
IndieLovePunk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a sock puppet. I don't even know that user. You cannot assume users with similar interests are they same person.
Decline reason:
Technically indistinguishable from blocked sock I.Wont.Give.In. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:19, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- It is interesting that you refer to "similar interests", which is exactly the expression used by an administrator declining a request for unblocking of one of the other sockpuppets of the same blocked editor. However, the evidence goes somewhat beyond just "similar interests". The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- What is this proof? IndieLovePunk (talk) 23:05, 22 September 2015 (UTC)