User talk:Indubitably/Archive 37

Archive 30

←

Archive 35

Archive 36

Archive 37

Archive 38

Archive 39

Archive 40

Vandalism

Huh. At least when you get your page vandalized, it's not too bad. Look what I get. —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 19:02, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Note to anyone else reading the above - that's really nasty. Don't click, kids. —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 19:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha, I'd not even seen that. Haven't been looking at my watchlist. XD That's great. Hahaha. Sorry 'bout yours... not as great. :p Jennavecia ^(Talk) 19:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

And there goes another one. Dannnnngggg.... —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 19:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Ooooh, bad times. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 19:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Bad times, indeed. But good luck with the Huggling and all~

La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Nothing like a Wiki-cookie in bad times. :) —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 19:16, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

I actually laughed my ass off when comparing those two diffs! Sorry La Pianista but that was funny :) ——Possum (talk) 21:33, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

I see

Well, judging by your picture, you are a very hot woman. Nice shirt. Anyway, fair enough, I'll stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.32.230.244 (talk • contribs)

Good. Thank you. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 20:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

*concurs with the above* -- Gurch (talk) 21:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

141.209.236.229

If you see the the "epic fail" again don't bother with a warning, just go straight for the block button. They have been away for a few months but I guess they must be bored again and have decided to return. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Good to know. Thanks for the heads up. :) Jennavecia ^(Talk) 22:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Elizabeth Gracen

Hello, there. About the current situation at Elizabeth Gracen, I would like to point out that www.elizabethgracen.net is not the actress's official site, but a libelous page. Please check it to see what I mean. This IP user has been trying to add it to the article for at least a year and has been reverted ever since. Have a nice day, Rosenknospe (talk) 22:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. I'll see about blacklisting the link. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 22:37, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

It's blacklisted now. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 22:46, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, good. Thank you very much for your intervention ! Have a nice day, Rosenknospe (talk) 11:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

:)

I've read your rules, don't worry! Actually, I have my own page. Blacky98 You could find me, BUT someone is deleting all my stuff. :( I warned 'em on emoticons I'm 10. OK, bye... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.64.79.60 (talk) 23:09, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Um. Okay. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 23:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

About the Gaokerena

You reverted my edit on the Gaokerena page, saying it was "unconstructive". I'd like to let you know that this was not vandalism, the versions of the myth I have heard actually name the donkey as the Rightous Ass, as silly as that sounds. I mean no ill intent, I just wanted to clear that up. :) 66.63.86.156 (talk) 23:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. Perhaps it would be more appropriate if you included a reliable source with the addition. :/ Jennavecia ^(Talk) 23:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Baffled

I'm the guy who edited the grolm article to eliminate the implication that the entire species survives on its own dead. In The Wheel of Time series, they are very violent and barbaric creatures that will eat each other when the opportunity arises, but by no means does "their diet consist of their own dead", unless there is something really profound in the books I haven't read yet. I'm just a little baffled as to why you reverted the edit for being unconstructive. Is this something done by default to everyone who doesn't have an account because of the high percentage of vandalizing retards? Sorry if I screwed up the code a bit, I'm a wiki noob. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.229.94.157 (talk) 23:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Not all IP edits are reverted. If the code was messed up, that's probably the reason for the revert. Or if the information appeared to be inaccurate and lacked a source. If you can link me to the edit that I reverted, that would be most helpful. I may have made a mistake with the revert. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 00:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

I found the edit and I have struck the warning from your talk page and left my apologies there, as well as reverted myself. Regards, Jennavecia ^(Talk) 02:29, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for being attentive and giving it a second look! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.229.94.157 (talk) 04:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, for sure! :) Jennavecia ^(Talk) 13:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Just a friendly note

Hi Jennavecia,

You might not be aware of this, but templating long term users, like you did here is generally considered impolite. Please have a quick read of the essay on templating regulars and perhaps consider leaving an apology.

Best regards,
ChaoticReality 00:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

You're right. c.c I have been naughty. I'll go apologize now. I am shamed. FOR SHAME! Jennavecia ^(Talk) 01:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

You make sure you do that, Missy! Don't make me come over there... ChaoticReality 01:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

What you mean wrong hair??

Now don't do it again. – iridescent 01:08, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

OI! I just warned you about doing things like this. Next time, I will be reporting you to AN/I. ChaoticReality 01:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

The Matrix is real

This page or section has been blinked as a courtesy to all participants.

Hi Jennavecia

Sorry, but you shouldn't just revert, I created this change and monitored it for an hour, but the thing it is about, sorry for the matrix-like wording: real.

You can't just remove it. A philosophical issue like reality and computer virtual reality IS A DEEPLY SERIOUS WARNING.

This box-content is the truth. Just check out the other story at sonic weaponry or check the dates of the wiki post and the february school shootings. I can also send you to ibm or virgin, but just bugger of, this revert is just not going to happen (it is too serious). Please check things out more seriously next time, this is the real thing! - Lord Santos

Right. Okay. Well, I'll keep that in mind. But, contrary to what you've stated above, I can just revert it, and I did. Your addition had three main issues as far as Wikipedia goes. 1/ It's what we refer to as original research, 2/ The article is on the movie and what you've added has absolutely nothing to do with it, and 3/ You placed it in the infobox, which isn't coded for it, so it didn't show up in the article page anyway. So, basically, it's going to continue to be removed, and if you continue to put it back, you'll lose your editing privileges. So please refrain from adding original research and stick to sourced information. Thanks, Jennavecia ^(Talk) 20:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

I told you I was going to do it...

Gazimoff has given you a pie! Pies promote the kind of hearty eating that puts a smile on your face and a sustaining meal in your stomach. Hopefully this pie has made your day better. Spread the goodness by giving someone else a pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating! Spread the goodness of pie by adding {{subst:Wikipie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Not the picture I had wanted to use, but it still works. Enjoy! :) Gazimoff 23:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Omai Lara, who ate all the pies?? O_O ——Possum (talk) 23:44, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Burrrp! And no Haggis? ...Dave1185 (talk) 23:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha, that's great, Gazimoff. I like your pi pie better, but this pi pie will do! XD Jennavecia ^(Talk) 23:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm just going to watch and see if it catches on :) Gazimoff 00:26, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I think it's catching on. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 00:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

comment

Sorry J...U were right, i did not read te page good...Sorry for calling you a B, lol...By the way if you can put up a Pic of Carol that would be nice. Have a good night! Oh and sorry for writing on here, but i dont know how else to write to you and i dont want to write on Carol's page again... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.91.112.5 (talk • contribs)

I moved this comment from your user page. Cheers! Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 04:15, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

A B? Did someone call me a bitch?! Surely not! >_> Jennavecia ^(Talk) 12:00, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Hard to believe that anyone would waste their time and effort to state the bleedin' obvious, isn't it? :lol: --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 12:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha, so true! So true! Jennavecia ^(Talk) 12:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Whazzup

You know, you're an admin. You can just go ahead and block all the vandals. Thought I'd remind you. BTW, what's been up? I know, I'm a terrible friend. But how you been? --Jayron32.talk.contribs 12:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Wait.... I'm an admin!?! :O zOMG! \o/ Woooo! Go me. Oh wait, I knew that. ;)

I'm using Huggle, and the block function is borked, so we just auto-report everything. I'm good by the way. I got promoted! It's good times. How are you and yours? Jennavecia ^(Talk) 12:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Promoted? Does that mean you're like head waitress? Or even better than that? We're awesome. We're expecting another son in January, and Andrew has become more time-consuming, which is why I'm not as active as I used to be. You could drop me a line on Facebook sometime too... I check that from time to time... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 12:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I rarely use FB, but I'll try... for you! Uhm... I'm a crew leader and I'm training to be an assistant manager. :D Hey... jump on Yahoo or IRC. There's BRC news that's neither funny or bathrobe related, but important. Oh, and CONGRATS! Jennavecia ^(Talk) 12:54, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I was going to ask the same thing, but it appears that Jayron beat me to it. Not that I mind doing the dirty work! Congrats on the AM position! Just stay away from anything that is a salary position!! --Kralizec! (talk) 14:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! :) Jennavecia ^(Talk) 14:26, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for removing that nonsense from my talk page so quickly. It is much appreciated! Alanraywiki (talk) 14:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 14:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

HI!

Sorry if my edit summary in I'm a PC [1]was less than clear. I removed the line about Seinfeld because although he did appear in the Microsoft ads just before this series, he does not have any involvement and does not appear in these particular ads at all. Sorry if I appeared to revert brusquely, I didn't mean too and was just focused.76.224.68.237 (talk) 14:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Ah, no problem. Thanks for the note. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 14:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I have appraised the user of his 3rd revert for the day, and that any subsequent reverts will result in a 3RR complaint being filed. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 14:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Jennavecia, sorry but it looks like your revert and my revert of each other is being used by Arcayne as a basis to remove me. I hope I honestly characterized the interaction here:[2] Sorry for the bother, but as he used your name, and I needed to defend I thought you should know your stuff was being used.76.224.68.237 (talk) 17:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Reporting to AIV

Just wondering why you are? Is this something to do with Huggle and the new "feature" regarding the flag to stop talk page edits? I seem to remember reading that somewhere. Just seemed odd to see your name at AIV! Pedro :  Chat  14:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, see here and there's also the section a couple up #Whazzup. :) Huggle's block feature is borked. It blocks them from using their talk page automatically, so it's currently disabled and instead auto-reports to AIV. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 14:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Ahh, yeah if I'd bothered to read the above section that would have saved some time! Still, makes it easy for us non hugglers - if you report I block on sight- if you could tell me your prefered block duration at the same time it would be even easier :) Pedro :  Chat  14:16, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

It's an automatic thing. I just revert the edit, it scans the talk page, if a final warning has already been issued, it bypasses the warning step and reports directly to AIV. It's one click revert. Just use your discretion. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 14:19, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Remember you can disable automatic reporting if you want more control over the process -- Gurch (talk) 21:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

To remember it, I'd have to have already known it... :p But I like the way it's set up. I don't mind reporting, I just don't want to keep repeating why. :D Jennavecia ^(Talk) 01:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

AAU reminder notice

A friendly reminder from the Adopt-a-User project =)

Hey there Jennavecia! This is a friendly reminder to update your status at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adoptee's Area/Adopters whenever it is appropriate in order to provide new users with the most up-to-date information on available adopters. Also please note that we will be removing adopters who have not edited in 60 days. If you become active again (and we hope you do!) please feel free to re-add yourself. Cheers!

• Notice delivery by xenobot 14:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism?

You have got to be kidding. There is no way that my edit could possibly be considered "vandalism". I simply reverted a bad edit. Why did I revert the edit? Because... it's not a "copyright violation" to include the list on an article about a list. That edit went against Wikipedia's policy on copyright paranoia. Maybe you should actually read my edit before you automatically assume that the evil IP address has vandalized the page.--24.129.100.84 (talk) 14:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

It's a copyright violation to copy the published list of a magazine. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 14:32, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

The article didn't "copy" the list. It just said which shows were on the list.--24.129.100.84 (talk) 14:40, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Is the list in the same order in the magazine article as it is in your edit? Okay. Copyright infringement. We can't republish their list. We can talk about it and cite it. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 14:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

It is not copyright infringement to say which titles were included on the list. For example: after the AFI aired their list of the 100 greatest American movies, countless websites and newspapers said which films were on the list, including Wikipedia.--24.129.100.84 (talk) 15:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

There is a difference. Lists compiled from readership/viewership polls (such as the AFI lists) are not the same as lists published as editorial opinion (such as TV Guide lists). Arguably a seemingly minor distinction, perhaps, but it's one we make all the same. Notice, for example, that we don't have an article for People Magazine's 100 Most Beautiful People, and while we do have Time 100: The Most Important People of the Century, the actual list is not included, rather prose is written from it, pulling out certain names and discussing. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 19:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the revert to my talk page. I was going to give him a chance, but he apparently doesn't want one. DARTH PANDA^talk 14:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 14:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Action

Action must be taken against User:Tirna14 as they have consistently vandalised a certain page (Austria–Hungary) as you and I both noticed. Limideen 16:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 14:52, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

I left a note. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 19:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

IP Edit Warring

You might want to take another look at List of top association football goal scorers. You tried to stop the edit war on that a few days ago but it just started again immediately the block expired. Bagunceiro (talk) 16:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a week. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 18:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

A constructive edit

Regarding my changes to Bookrunner, I simply removed a list of almost random news articles that happened to mention bookrunners in the titles. The articles are not explanatory about the role of bookrunner and shed no light on the subject of the page. I removed them cos they violated the "wiki is not an indiscriminate collection of info" guideline. How about you revert your revert? 128.118.87.29 (talk) 21:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

My apologies for that. I reverted myself and deleted your talk page, which only had the one edit from me. Thanks for using the edit summary feature... it helps when people like me read them. *facepalm* Regards, Jennavecia ^(Talk) 21:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi

You're a great administrator. Now I am your friend. I'd be happier to see more favours you could do for me in WP:RFAA. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 06:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Riiight. Well, the only favors I do are to appease the cabal. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 12:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Rock music Newsletter for October 2008

The Rock music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 9 - October 2008

"As long as my face is on page one, I don't care what they say about me on page seventeen." - Mick Jagger Project news The project has a total of 106 GAs and 91 Featured Articles and Lists put together. We collaborated on Soul Bomb. Help us select good versions of WP:ROCK articles for inclusion on the Wikipedia 0.7 release! Find out more about Wikipedia 0.7 selection on the project talk page and add your thoughts to the discussion. If you are personally responsible for a Featured or Good Article listed here, please the select a version to include in Wikipedia 0.7 on that page if you haven't already. Page versions must be selected by October 20. The genres in infobox fields have been removed cause of the discussion found here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music#Time to remove genre section on info box?. You can provide any opinions you may have about this. This month's "Recommended Rock Album" is Soundgarden - Superunknown (1994).

Editors User:Be Black Hole Sun

Be Black Hole Sun (talk · contribs)

Request For Outside Perspective

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hippie#Variety_of_English

Can you please look at that? This would be unfortunate if someone gets a warning for three reverts over one word. Also, if you get a chance, please look at my Huggle reverts. I want to make sure the warnings coincide with the edits I 'rollback'. ^{XF Law} _{talk at me} 14:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Reverted and warned. Let me know if there are continuing issues. I'll take a look at your reverts now. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 14:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I checked over a few of your last 100 edits and everything looked good to me. I also read the article you created. Nice work. I upgraded it to start class. You should consider doing a DYK on it. The last paragraph would make for a good hook. :) Jennavecia ^(Talk) 16:12, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: M.O.P.

Thought you might enjoy this: http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1822929 86.44.23.229 (talk) 17:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Hahahahhahhaaaha. Ah, man... that's awesome. That made my f-up worth it completely! XD Hahaha, thank you! Jennavecia ^(Talk) 17:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Stones (rapper)

We have permission to use the copyrighted material because we are actually the ones that conduted the interview of the artist Stones as we do with tons of other rappers. The HipHopDoc's user page was created because we have tons of information on tons of artists that we felt like we should share with the wikipedia community. (HipHopDoc (talk) 18:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC))

You need to confirm that through WP:OTRS. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 18:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

You suck

Can you stop fucking everything up? Srs, I'm srsly. You FAIL. Go take a nap because you're making a fool of yourself. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 19:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Sigh. You're right. I'm not paying attention. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 19:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Damn right, you're not. It's shameful. How many times have you had to revert yourself this week, or fix your own mistakes? Srs, go take a nap. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 19:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay, okay. No need to be a bitch about it. Damn. Gotchya! I'm going... Jennavecia ^(Talk) 19:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Jeez what a bitch. >:O <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 19:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Wait...did I miss the part where you broke the project again? Multiple Laras? Wow, what an achievement! haha ——Possum (talk) 19:38, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

213.1.225.11 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)

It's me again. I just want to tell you about 213.1.225.11 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), he/she has been deleting portions of a page content, templates, etc, and doing other unconstructive edits like this. Please keep a watch on this user's edits, and block him/her when he/she is doing another edit like all these. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 06:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm not your personal WP:AIV. I reverted your warning from his talk page considering there was already a final warning, which was issued two minutes after his last edit, and yours came two days later. That's not only unnecessary, it's inappropriate. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 12:38, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

You are not my personal WP:AIV, and you are not my personal administrator, I know that but you are an administrator for Wikipedia, and you are also my friend. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 02:22, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

What are you talking about? I don't even know you. لennavecia 04:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Masson

Yeah OK I know what I did on the Pollock Halls page isn't how it's done, but it sort of pissed me off how someone can say an area is more friendly than another, scientific as that is.

Not to mention, in reality it is the least friendly place on campus... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.81.254.74 (talk) 17:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Feel free to go in and take out all the unsourced opinion, fluff and other crap. Just fill in the edit summary box to say you're removing it per WP:NPOV, WP:OR and WP:V. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 17:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

That Page Was Mine

Oberoi Middle East And Naresh Oberoi pages are mine, i deleted cause, the admins were telling me for sources, i gave all links proving the existence and reputation, what more do you need??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolverine 511 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure what happened. I'll look into it. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 18:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

They still exist, unless they were deleted and then recreated... I should have checked that. Hmm, I'll do that in a moment, but both show a clear conflict of interest. They are not neutrally written by any means. They read like advertisements. The formatting of text suggested it was a copy/paste from another site, but I did not find anything in a search of selected text. It may be best for you to request someone else write these articles at WP:RA. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 18:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay, okay. I see now. I use Huggle to patrol for vandalism and other edits in need of correction. It's a semi-automated tool that allows for quick review and revert. Normally, when an editor blanks a page, when the revert button his clicked, if that editor started the article, Huggle will automatically display a notice asking if the page should instead be deleted. In these cases, for whatever reason, that didn't happen. Sorry for the confusion. They're deleted now. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 18:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

False report

Sorry, i must have made a mistake with the capitalizations when linking. The guy who made a constructive edit to List of characters from Coronation Street which you thought was bad 18:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.92.154 (talk)

That doesn't explain your other edits. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 19:52, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks message

I think you're right. Thanks, you can CSD delete the page if you please. I kind of find it interesting how much the discussion had died, and that now we're finally getting comments from anonymous users. ChyranandChloe (talk) 03:37, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 03:53, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'll add you to the checkpage when the bot gets approved. CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 14:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't know what that is, but thanks! :D لennavecia 14:47, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Lara stop failing!

Click for bigger, better to see it in its entirety. See 'In the news' and 'DYK'

Ok, so I know you're a rogue admin, but pissing off Jimbo is pushing the boat out. (Oh and note the section about Jimbo's love for Possums in DYK) ——Possum (talk) 08:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Lulz! :D PeterSymonds (talk) 08:27, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

O_O u failz :P Sam ^Blab 12:02, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

zOh noes! I haz been desysopped emergency-like by teh Jimbob!? And so it has begun.... لennavecia 15:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Ohhh but you just totally missed the part about Possums which was by far the most important piece of text O_O ——Possum (talk) 16:06, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, yea... right, right. Possums are important! لennavecia 16:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Why are some business links allowed?

I'm curious why wikipedia and the admins use a very arbitrary policy of allowing businesses to be linke dto the page. What criteria are used? Some are allowed and some not.

Seems that the admins simply ban people who try to edit pages without verifying if the information added is correct or not, and allow many edits that distort the truth. But then, I guess that is the history of the internet isn't it......

Saw it on the internet, it MUST be true! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.119.227.33 (talk) 04:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

We allow links in articles on the company, person, whatever. You were removing appropriate links. WP:SPAM and WP:EL explain it better than I could. لennavecia 04:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

How is a related link to a business an appropriate link in this case when others have been removed? The link was not in the article, but was in the external links section.

Can you show me an example of some removed? As far as the location, we include relevant external links in the EL section of articles. They do not necessarily have to be in the body of the article. لennavecia 04:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

small request

Take your pick. You can even enlarge it so there's more....

Can you make a null edit on User:J.delanoy/huggle.css? Huggle keeps changing a setting on me and it would be nice to be able to use rollback instead of undo to fix it. Thanks, J.delanoy^gabs_adds 04:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Done. Do I get chocolate? لennavecia 04:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Sure. Thanks! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 04:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

O! Dark chocolate, kthx! :D لennavecia 04:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Just in case you missed it...

Check the deletion history of Jennavecia and User:MrWikiWikiMan's last edit with his account ever. Aren't these vandals just so creative? Not! =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

O, sweet. I had missed that! Hahaah. I should watchlist it. Thanks! XD لennavecia 05:29, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Good idea since it has been created twice in the last week. Keep up the good work! =D -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Ha. My attack page pwns your attack page! (and I got that long before I was an admin, so bonus points for me!) J.delanoy^gabs_adds 05:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Double ha! My page was here before I even created an account. Oh, wait... Never mind. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Hahahahahahahaha, OMG, I'm surprised that one wasn't written for me! XD Hahaha, o man, srsly, that pwns my page for real. Ah. لennavecia 11:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Dear Jennavecia, thanks for your explanations. Endogenous -i should not be blocked. Your explanations will help me in the long run.

In case of IP 74.11.193.242, I disagree with you. I analyzed the edits of the IP and there is no doubt in my mind that the intention of the IP is to vandalize Wikipedia.

I've studied WP:BLOCK many times. I think we should mention in WP:BLOCK that when the intention of someone is to vandalize Wikipedia or cause trouble, the user may be blocked from editing for sometime. Thoughts?

It was wonderful talking to you and I learned few things from you! Have a nice day! :-) AdjustShift (talk) 14:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

I understand your frustration. And it may seem like common sense to block a user who, upon looking over their history, appears to have no other intention than vandalism. The issue is that if they've not edited recently, they may have already moved on. With IPs, they change and you don't know when that will happen. So with them in particular, we have to take extra care. Our warning system is in place for good reasons and we need to attempt to follow it fairly. When users have no received the appropriate set of warnings (there are, of course, exceptions), then they should not be blocked. Or, if they have received the full set, but have not edited since the final, we need to assume good faith that they've read the warnings and have taken them seriously. As an administrator, it's my responsibility to ensure all of that. لennavecia 14:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your explanation. You seems to be a very competent admin. Have a nice day! :-) AdjustShift (talk) 14:11, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thank you as well. Best regards, لennavecia 14:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Editors

Which policy says that "British" must be used rather than English? --Jameboy (talk) 19:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

WP:Common sense? The English come from England, the British come from Great Britain. Those are not the same sets. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 19:46, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

English is a subset of British, so that doesn't seem to explain which should be used and when. --Jameboy (talk) 19:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

That was my error. From your report at RFPP, I thought it was a matter of British English vs American English for an article on a British band. Bad assumption on my part. I should not have assumed it would be that easy! Ha. I corrected myself immediately after. It should be English, which I've noted on the IP's talk page. لennavecia 19:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

And ya, Malleus, considering England is part of Great Brittan... of course, he has a point... Those from England are still English. لennavecia 19:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Vladimir Zografski

Jenna, G4 doesn't apply to stuff that was speedy deleted. How about AFDing instead? Best wishes, -- how do you turn this on 20:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Doh! Good point... what was I thinking? لennavecia 20:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

No big deal :-) He is of marginal notability, but an AFD would probably be fairer. Cheers, -- how do you turn this on 20:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

BRC IRC

Undertow insists on brc chat, but I keep getting kicked. !HALP? :D (Hopefully you get what I'm on about...?) Garden. 10:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I was redirected, undertow led me wrong :) Garden. 10:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

He isn't often on and almost never when I am. The BRC chan is an invite chan and only ops can invite and invex. He's an op, I think, but he probably doesn't know how to add people as Freenode changed recently. Also, we don't invite anyone without chan consensus because of the personal IRL stuff we talk about. لennavecia 12:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

From User:Myrecovery, to User:Jennavecia

I have stopped those unnecessary editing in talk pages. Please do not block me.

--Amit Gomes 17:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. لennavecia 17:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)