April 2021

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages (including user talk pages) such as Talk:White genocide conspiracy theory are for discussion related to improving (a) an encyclopedia article in specific ways based on reliable sources or (b) project policies and guidelines. They are not for general discussion about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 20:35, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

And if you're just here to complain about "blatant bigotry against white nationalists," then you're unlikely to get much traction. Wikipedia isn't going to promote the notion that bigots are victims of bigotry. Acroterion (talk) 20:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Admin Behavior is Disgusting

edit

I'm confused. Calling White Genocide and Replacement Theory far-right conspiracy theory is itself an opinion. My Talk section had detailed statistics that prove that the Great Replacement is happening. I contributed US Census Bureau statistics. Obviously it ran contrary to your world view and your bigoted feelings against why anyone would think Latinos are replacing the white Americans population, which is indisputably true. There are projects of up t 42 MILLION trying to flock to the US right now to get citizenship from Biden[1]. No one is allowed to talk about this unless you are criticizing it, that means you are not being honest about your intentions, which is to stifle a free and fair argument to push your political agenda. You just want to shut down anyone who disagrees with you to push your own political narrative that demonizes white people by associating negative attributes to them. We've had to put up with 4 years of the radical Left's Trump Derangement Syndrome over the blatant bigotry against White nationalists. This is what I wrote. Explain to me how this is any more of an opinion than the Wiki author's garbage article. I know you might not think racist people have a right to live and breathe, but they are people, they are an ethnicity of people, you're targeting them based on their ethnicity making you a bigot.

Original Talk on White Genocide Article

edit

I have no love for nazis or bigots but I'm confused. Is white genocide labeled a conspiracy theory because there are no demographic changes, low birthrate, or conspirators? Just because a racist believes the world is round doesn't make it racist. Do only white people who think this? African and Asian Americans also have low birthrate and believe in Replacement theory, so why isn't it a Black Nationalist or Asian Nationalist conspiracy theory? How does White genocide different from Replacement theory? If anything it's a Nativist ideology. To prove something is a conspiracy theory, You must invalidate the theory or show there is no conspiracy, but there are rapid demographic changes here in the US and Europe based on well documented high immigration and low birth rate.

According to the National Vital Statistics Reports the birthrates of all Americans is 1.706 births per woman (BPW), down from 1.931 BPW in 2010. Replacement rate is 2.1 BPW because there is a man and woman and they need to have 2+ kids to keep up our population. In 2019, White Americans had 1.719 BPW, African Americans have a birthrate of 1.8325 BPW, Asians are 1.7945 BPW, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander are 2.0765 BPW, and Latinos have a birthrate of 2.0925 BPW[2].

In the US Census Bureau document, A Changing Nation: Population Projections Under Alternative Immigration Scenarios in Figure 1 "US Population Population Projections by Immigration Scenario(In millions)", the projected population of the US in 2060 has 4 projections: no, low, medium, and high immigration scenarios, which were 319.7 million, 376.2 million, 404.5 million, and 446.9 million respectively[3]. Based on immigration policy there would be a difference of about 70.7 million between high and low immigration scenarios. I don't know about you, but 70.7 million extra people is a lot of people and pollution I would prefer my children to not to have to compete with that many extra people, even if they were all white. This has nothing to do with racism, it's just common sense that you shouldn't take on MORE 70.7 MILLION people when there is global warming, a epidemic of drugs and cartel crime, and limited resources. When does this stop, when we're the size of China? I'm white so I don't have a right to have an opinion because "white people are racist"... right. Stereotyping white people as racist is called anti-white racism; some people think you can't be racist against whites, but that's because they're racist. A bully is a bully.

To have a conspiracy there must be conspirators. There ARE politicians who advocate for mass and illegal migration who do count as conspirators. Currently US President Joe Biden gave illegal immigrants a 100 day deportation freeze that triggered a mass migration crisis at the US boarder where there are over 170,000 mass migrants as of March 2021, over 18,000 unaccompanied minors, packed into extremely over packed detention facilities that are 1700%+ over capacity[4]. President Harris and VP Biden are literally getting kids human trafficked to boost the Latino vote for Democrats.

Democrats in the US advocate mass and illegal immigration to control US Federal politics indefinitely. In order to change US election outcomes, Democrats must either change Republican or Independent votes to Democrat, or bring on more new voters. California is a Sanctuary state because by not removing the illegal immigrants it causes the population of California to increase, giving California 2 extra US House of Representatives seats, and the children of the illegal immigrants will vote Blue (Democrat) no matter who. 27% of California was born in Mexico[5]. About 1/5 of the state of California has ALREADY been replaced with Democrat Latino voters. I live in Oregon and there are floods of transient drug addicts and renters from California flooding in jacking up our rent and causing a lot of crime. They're mostly white, a lot of conservatives too, and I still don't want them here, even if they're a white conservative I don't care. OREGON doesn't want CALIFORNIA to flooding up here and vice versa, the East Coast doesn't want the West Coast flooding over there and vice versa, then WHY would ANYONE think we want Mexico moving up here? I'm from Virginia, a State that used to been deep Red (Republican) but mass migration from Latinos changed the State to Blue (Democrat). It sucks when a political party you are diametrically opposed to takes over, regardless of race.

In 2018 the US Justice Department data showed only 16% of asylum cases originated from a credible fear claim[6]. About 15% of asylum seeks fraudulently add other people's children, and 90% don't show up to their court dates[7]. It's estimated the cartels have made about $500 million+ trafficking humans in 2021 as of April. There are lots of nefarious people who make profits because this articles paints anyone who opposes mass and illegal immigration as White nationalists.

Someone explain to me how anything that I just said is racist? This article claims that there are only racist intentions behind this 'conspiracy theory', but I just cited reasons that aren't racist. Mexico really doesn't like all of the illegal aliens because they're in with cartel terrorists and human traffickers. People are saying it's far-right/racist to support immigration restrictions because Wikipedia says it's nativist and nativist is far-right, then journalists write stories about it that are cited in a circular reference on Wikipedia. I'm tired of being targeted because of my skin color and for being conservative.

I was going to say It's very simple: Americans having more melanin or knowing a second language doesn't make them less American or any less human. Fewer "white" people only matters if you're a white supremacist. Buut then you're saying racist shit like Mexicans are human traffickers (when they're more likely to be victims of human trafficking). So, you're blocked for not being here to build an encyclopedia but to promote a white supremacist conspiracy theory. I should pray that God helps your heart. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ian.thomson (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
  1. ^ Bedard, Paul. "Titanic surge: 42 million more Latin Americans want into US". Washington Examiner.
  2. ^ "National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 70, No. 2, March 23, 2021" (PDF). National Center for Health Statistics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 14 April 2021.
  3. ^ "A Changing Nation: Population Projections Under Alternative Immigration Scenarios" (PDF). US Census Bureau.
  4. ^ Ainsley, Julia. "Record number of unaccompanied children crossed the border in March". NBC News. NBC.
  5. ^ Politifact. "Twenty-seven percent of Californians, almost 11 million, "were born in a foreign land."". PolitiFact. Retrieved 13 April 2021.
  6. ^ Mekelburg, Madlin. "Says about 80% to 90% of people seeking asylum do not have a valid claim". PolitFact. PolitFact.
  7. ^ David, Jack. "DHS Chief Reveals Large Percentage of Asylum Seekers Disappear, Skip Court Hearings". The Western Journal. The Western Journal.