Info235sp14-ask
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Hi A, Thanks for putting time into your edits, Wolk v. Kodak Imaging Network Inc. looks more polished. Sashashekhar (talk) 04:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome, it was already very good : ) ! Info235sp14-ask (talk) 02:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
You're invited! WikiWomen's Edit-a-thon at the University of California, Berkeley
edit| Saturday, April 5 - WikiWomen's Edit-a-thon at the University of California, Berkeley - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
.jpg) |
The University of California, Berkeley's Berkeley Center for New Media is hosting our first edit-a-thon, facilitated by WikiWoman Sarah Stierch, on April 5! This event, focused on engaging women to contribute to Wikipedia, will feature a brief Wikipedia policy and tips overview, followed by a fast-paced energetic edit-a-thon. Everyone is welcome to attend.
Please bring your laptop and be prepared to edit about women and women's history! The event is April 5, from 1-5 PM, at the Berkeley Center for New Media Commons at Moffitt Library. You must RSVP here - see you there! SarahStierch (talk) 00:15, 14 March 2014 (UTC) |
DYK for Wolk v. Kodak Imaging Network, Inc.
edit | On 21 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wolk v. Kodak Imaging Network, Inc., which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that according to a U.S. Federal court opinion, Kodak Imaging Network was not liable for copyright infringement, as it relied on an automated photofinishing process? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
DYK for Connection Distributing Co. v. Holder
edit| | On 5 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Connection Distributing Co. v. Holder, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in Connection Distributing Co. v. Holder, the Sixth Circuit held that record-keeping requirements of the Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act were not unconstitutional? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Connection Distributing Co. v. Holder. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Hope you are having a good weekend. Thanks Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)