User talk:Ingenuity/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ingenuity. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 |
Precious anniversary
 | |
| One year! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- A year already?? Wow, time flies! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Thank you for bringing Alfred Grosser to the Main page! - I thanked Seiji Ozawa, and have the story of Helga Paris today, a photographer of houses and faces. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
The image, taken on a cemetery last year after the funeral of a distant but dear family member, commemorates today, with thanks for their achievements, four subjects mentioned on the Main page and Vami_IV, a friend here. Listen to music by Tchaikovsky (an article where one of the four is pictured), sung by today's subject (whose performance on stage I enjoyed two days ago). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
more music and flowers on Rossini's rare birthday --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Phase I of the 2024 RfA review is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the requests for adminship process.
- Following an RfC, the inactivity requirement for the removal of the interface administrator right increased from 6 months to 12 months.
Technical news
- The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)
Miscellaneous
- The 2024 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Doǵu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, MdsShakil, Minorax, Nehaoua, Renvoy and RoySmith as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
- Following the 2024 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Ajraddatz, Albertoleoncio, EPIC, JJMC89, Johannnes89, Melos and Yahya.
The Signpost: 2 March 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"
- Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"
- In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record
- Obituary: Vami_IV
- Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday
- WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close
Amala Ekpunobi
I am not wikipedia expert, but you seem to have made an article about Amala Ekpunobi which was then deleted? Is there a way to still see it? Do you have it in you own scratch environment? I would like to read it. AntonHogervorst (talk) 13:13, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Regarding 147.161.225.106
Thank you for taking action with 147.161.225.106. The proxy API checker seems to think this IP is a proxy/VPN. Is that enough evidence to warrant a substantially longer block? — Archer1234 (t·c) 15:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- I've blocked them for six months instead, thanks for pointing that out. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thank you very much .. both you and PhilKnight, who I sent a message to last night. This person is relentless. Regards, Bringingthewood (talk) 22:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I
Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:
- Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
- Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
- Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
- Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
- Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
- Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
- Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
- Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
- Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
- Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
- Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
- Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
- Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
- Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
- Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
- Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
- Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.
To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Admin's Barnstar | |
| For revoking TPA here, just as I was about to request it. Cheers! JeffSpaceman (talk) 17:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| Sorry for causing you to have to delete Draft:Theresa Jackson twice in a row! Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 22:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC) |
I blocked said user wohm you seem to have missed when giving the block notice. Cheers. -- Alexf(talk) 19:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Your abuse filter script
Hello, Ingenuity. I've got your User:Ingenuity/AbuseFilterContribs.js, I love it. Super helpful. But today I was checking out an IPv6 range, 2603:8081:5b00:65c::/64, which I ended up blocking for a month (nasty BLP vandalism, no constructive edits, from four IPs). 3 out of the four had made edits disallowed by the edit filter. But... it would be great if the /64 range contribs page also showed those filter interventions, so I didn't have to check the IPs individually. Another time it may obviously be a lot more than four IPs. Would that be possible? Bishonen | tålk 19:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC).
- @Bishonen: I'm afraid not... as far as I'm aware, the API doesn't support getting filter hits for ranges, unfortunately. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 19:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oh. OK. I guess it was a long shot. Thanks anyway. Bishonen | tålk 19:57, 20 March 2024 (UTC).
20 upper
Good afternoon. A user that you unbanned last year has exhibited some worrying behavior. Please see Talk:Fishing cat and attached GANs, as well as User talk:Grungaloo. This kind of thing is not my forte, and I would appreciate another set of eyes from someone who is familiar with the situation. Please let me know your thoughts and your advice on the proper course of action. Fritzmann (message me) 17:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- I've left a comment on their talk page. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:16, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Look I have no idea how to deal with this. Gaslighting me on my talk page now, "Your actions have shown me that you hate me" & "I'll quit GA to make you happy". That's just... not okay lol.
- I have looked at the user's other GANs and personally think that most of them (especially Megafauna, which has large uncited sections) would not pass a review at this stage. However, I don't want to be the one who goes and fails them because this user clearly has animosity towards me. I would appreciate assistance from an administrator who is better versed in dispute resolution to address this. Fritzmann (message me) 22:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
User:AkiraAnastasia12345
Hello! I saw a comment made by AkiraAnastasia12345 on their talk page that I thought I should bring to your attention. Their, they said: What if someone doxx your profile. You can't even use your name User:Ingenuity. I want to bring this to your attention because it seems like it might be a threat to dox you, but I'm not completely sure that that is the case, as it is worded oddly. GrayStorm(Talk|Contributions) 23:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- I read that more as a "how would you feel if someone doxxed you", it doesn't really look like a threat to me. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Alright, thats good. GrayStorm(Talk|Contributions) 01:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 March 2024
- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue
Women in Red April 2024
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – April 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.
Technical news
- The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)
Arbitration
- An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".
Miscellaneous
- Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.
New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello Ingenuity,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
AN closure
Does my single-GAN limit require me to withdraw multiple current nominations?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- @TonyTheTiger: yes, I think that would be best. However, you can keep nominations open if they're currently under review. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Your close at ANI
Thank you for your fair close. Looks like my support at RFA was justified. Lightburst (talk) 19:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Deletion request
Dear Ingenuity, Hello, can you delete Hamza Shaikh page then after I'll able to accepted Draft:Hamza Shaikh from WP:AFC process. 
Thanks ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Aviram7: done. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Ingenuity, Thank you for you're immediate response to me and for fast action for about my request
Thanks ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Ingenuity, Thank you for you're immediate response to me and for fast action for about my request
Administrative panel closure at WP:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination)
I saw your offer on AN, and am happy to take part in this panel. How do you propose we do this? Owen× ☎ 19:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @OwenX: once the AfD hits the seven-day mark (in a couple hours), I'll read through it and email you my preliminary thoughts. We can discuss the close from there. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds good! Owen× ☎ 20:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- OwenX Um, you should not be taking part in this close Owen, since you've already decided that the article should be kept.? Black Kite (talk) 22:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't think my participation in that DRV renders me WP:INVOLVED, and do not have strong views about the article either way. But since you raised the issue, let's take it to AN and see what others think. Owen× ☎ 22:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- OwenX Of course it renders you involved. But I don't think it needs to go to AN, I simply think you should leave the close to Ingenuity, because if you take part and the close is anything other than Delete, Merge or Redirect then there will be a controversy that we really don't need. Black Kite (talk) 22:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's a valid point. I already posted the question on AN, but will step aside for now. Owen× ☎ 23:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks (I had already posted at AN). To be clear, I'm not accusing you of being biased, only that there clearly would be an issue if anyone decided to take it to DRV (it would almost certainly be re-opened, and we definitely don't need a fourth AfD). Black Kite (talk) 23:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Fair point. I should have thought of that before spending over an hour carefully reviewing 140 !votes there... Owen× ☎ 23:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks all for the work. —Alalch E. 02:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Fair point. I should have thought of that before spending over an hour carefully reviewing 140 !votes there... Owen× ☎ 23:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks (I had already posted at AN). To be clear, I'm not accusing you of being biased, only that there clearly would be an issue if anyone decided to take it to DRV (it would almost certainly be re-opened, and we definitely don't need a fourth AfD). Black Kite (talk) 23:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's a valid point. I already posted the question on AN, but will step aside for now. Owen× ☎ 23:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- OwenX Of course it renders you involved. But I don't think it needs to go to AN, I simply think you should leave the close to Ingenuity, because if you take part and the close is anything other than Delete, Merge or Redirect then there will be a controversy that we really don't need. Black Kite (talk) 22:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't think my participation in that DRV renders me WP:INVOLVED, and do not have strong views about the article either way. But since you raised the issue, let's take it to AN and see what others think. Owen× ☎ 22:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- OwenX Um, you should not be taking part in this close Owen, since you've already decided that the article should be kept.? Black Kite (talk) 22:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds good! Owen× ☎ 20:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 02:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
I have sent you an email about requesting additions and a question about a private edit filter yesterday. Codename Noreste 🤔 𝙇𝙖 𝙎𝙪𝙢𝙖 02:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Responded. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirecting Where is Kate? to Catherine,_Princess_of_Wales#Health
I appreciate your effort in closing the AfD... but not leaving a redirect is not a policy based outcome, and so I've corrected it. {{R from non-neutral name}} signals that that title is disfavored, the history remains deleted, and random readers landing on that prior name are instead redirected to the much more succinct remaining section in the biography. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 08:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Makes sense. Thanks, @Jclemens. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please amend the closure to enable the redirect not to get deleted. The Anome has now deleted and fully protected the redirect per your close: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=161262546. If you feel like you need to talk to The Anome about undeleting the redirect, that would be great. The redirect should be undeleted. Ping Jclemens.—Alalch E. 09:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. Given that you are fine with Jclemens' reasoning, I will now restore the redirect: can you please update your closing summary to reflect this? — The Anome (talk) 09:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- The Anome What you have now restored is the whole page history and created a redirect - which suggests this was closed as "redirect" but it was not. It was closed as "delete". The redirect that Jclemens created was a delete and then redirect. As Jclemens says,
the history remains deleted
. The redirect is created after the deletion based on the assumption that someone will search this disfavoured term and want the primary article. Whether that is really a policy based outcome is unclear, but that was the intent, and not unreasonable based on the existence of a wikidata item. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 10:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)- I assume Anome made a mistake here, so I've re-deleted the page and undeleted the correct revisions. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 12:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks. And thanks for reading your way through all that AfD too! Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks to everyone for cleaning up the mess. That was indeed my mistake: I should only have reinstated the redirect. — The Anome (talk) 16:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks. And thanks for reading your way through all that AfD too! Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- I assume Anome made a mistake here, so I've re-deleted the page and undeleted the correct revisions. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 12:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- The Anome What you have now restored is the whole page history and created a redirect - which suggests this was closed as "redirect" but it was not. It was closed as "delete". The redirect that Jclemens created was a delete and then redirect. As Jclemens says,
- Yes. Given that you are fine with Jclemens' reasoning, I will now restore the redirect: can you please update your closing summary to reflect this? — The Anome (talk) 09:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Where is Kate? closure summary
Can you please edit your AfD closure summary for Where is Kate? to reflect your recent comments? — The Anome (talk) 10:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've done that now. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 12:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! I think everything's sorted now. — The Anome (talk) 16:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- My sincere thanks also. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! I think everything's sorted now. — The Anome (talk) 16:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
You might want to take this user's talk page access away. See [1]. Thanks! WizardGamer775 (talk) 23:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Help with improving my article
Hello Ingenuity,
I noticed that you're quite experienced with article creation on Wikipedia. I would appreciate it, if you could help me look over a biography I recently created on a filmmaker Dare Olaitan. I would just like to be sure it has an encyclopedic tone and that the references are reliable.
Thank you for your time. Aivrie (talk) 01:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Question about your AFD closure
As a matter of curiosity, why did you end up closing Where is Kate? as delete, instead of a merge. Especially with your comment "most people felt that, although there is significant coverage, the article contained more detail than was necessary, and a section in Catherine, Princess of Wales would be more appropriate." Esolo5002 (talk) 22:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Esolo5002. Sorry for taking so long to get back to you. I considered closing it as merge, but many !voters felt that the article's content was inappropriate and should be deleted, and merging would require the article's history to be preserved. It would also have to be a very selective merge, and since there already sections on the main article, it's moot now anyway. Essentially, I felt there wasn't a large benefit to merging it. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
How do you tell if content is AI generated?
Hi, saw your edit and edit summary on Abortion debate, and now I'm curious: how can you tell if content is AI generated? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 02:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Mr Serjeant Buzfuz: there's not just one thing that can determine if content is AI-generated, unfortunately, but there are a few things I look for. ChatGPT never cites sources (it's not really capable of doing that), and it often generates a opening paragraph, followed by a list, and then a closing paragraph (like in this edit). It uses some phrases often, like "some key points to consider", "plays a crucial role", etc. Another giveaway is that their edit on abortion debate was only two minutes after their last edit, so they'd have to type pretty fast! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 03:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Will keep an eye out for it. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 09:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am contacting you, seeing as how you have unblocked the user who I have noted above, to ask if it would be OK to remove the sock tag from their userpage? I ask since they are unblocked now, and I don't see a reason to keep it around at this point. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done that now, thanks for pointing that out. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
About the EC ban
Hi, I acknowledge the mistake I made for the Hamas edit; however, I have not created invalid pages and want to ask for undoing the revoke, I am terribly sorry about the mistake. Thank you Justin L. 1230 (talk) 22:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Justin L. 1230: you gained the permission through doing hundreds of rapid, tiny edits that are disruptive and do not demonstrate familiarity with Wikipedia's policies. I will not be reinstating your permission. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Alright Justin L. 1230 (talk) 00:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- My bad its not that deep Justin L. 1230 (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Will I be able to regain the EC rights if I make legitimate 500 more edits Justin L. 1230 (talk) 02:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Alright Justin L. 1230 (talk) 00:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2024
- In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics, and another wikirace on live TV
- News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law
- WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)
- Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users
- Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem
Sorry
I only just noticed your warning me about my violation of 3RR here, and I want to sincerely apologize. You are completely right, I should have taken care not to violate the edit warring policy, and from here on out I will warn a user who is edit warring and stop reverting before I violate the rule per your reasoning. Sorry about this, thank you for calling me on it. JeffSpaceman (talk) 20:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2024
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Preservation
Fellow editor,
It has come to my attention that somebody is making a rather disrespectful attempt to remove the article on the reputable fellow Max Baker-Hytch. I humbly request your presence in the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Baker-Hytch. to provide reasons and justification for keeping the article. We must thwart the nefarious plot to expunge this important article.--Pesclinomenosomlos (talk) 00:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Pesclinomenosomlos: there is no "nefarious plot" to remove the article. Stop posting this on peoples' talk pages or you will be blocked. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).
Guideline and policy news
- Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.
Technical news
- Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.
Miscellaneous
- This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins
Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:
- Proposals 2 and 9b (phase II discussion): Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA and Require links for claims of specific policy violations
- Proposal 3b (in trial): Make the first two days discussion-only
- Proposal 13 (in trial): Admin elections
- Proposal 14 (implemented): Suffrage requirements
- Proposals 16 and 16c (phase II discussion): Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs and Community recall process based on dewiki
- Proposal 17 (phase II discussion): Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions
- Proposal 24 (phase II discussion): Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process
- Proposal 25 (implemented): Require nominees to be extended confirmed
See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 04:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Just another run-of-the-mill update for this private filter including fixes and some changes. Codename Noreste 🤔 La Suma 04:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Green GA Editathon June 2024 - Going Back in Time
Hello Ingenuity:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in June 2024!
Running from June 1 to 30, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Going Back in Time! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 20 centuries by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.The Signpost: 16 May 2024
- News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections
- Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?
- Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24
- Comix: Generations
- Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
A Request
Hi, you just banned User:Heisentroph, would it be possible if you could restrict his talkpage access, as he's continuing to use it as a forum page. Mr Fink (talk) 04:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
List of Süper Lig broadcasters
I cannot make sense of the rapid deletion of the List of Süper Lig broadcasters page. I created this page again because I did not understand that this page, which does not contain any harmful content and only shows the broadcasters of the league, was deleted before. Can you enlighten me on this issue? Fatihoztrk950 (talk) 15:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Fatihoztrk950. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Süper Lig broadcasters; the page was deleted because it does not meet the notability guideline for lists. I deleted the page because of the speedy deletion criteria about recreation of previously deleted articles. If you'd like, I can restore the page and move it to your userspace so that you can continue working on it until it meets the guideline for list notability. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2024
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Communists shouldn't be alive
Should User:Communists shouldn't be alive/sandbox be deleted given the incendiary title? Air on White (talk) 19:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done. —Ingenuity (t • c) 19:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.
Technical news
- The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
- The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.
Miscellaneous
- WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!
The Signpost: 8 June 2024
- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
You've got mail!
Message added 03:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Please check my email, this is an urgent matter. Codename Noreste 🤔 La Suma 03:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sent you another email this Monday regarding an update to an LTA filter. Codename Noreste 🤔 La Suma 02:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 04:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Some modification requests to some private filters were sent to your inbox. Codename Noreste 🤔 La Suma 04:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ingenuity, I'm kindly waiting for your reply to my email (as of last Thursday) about these modifications to those private filters I authored, thank you. Codename Noreste 🤔 Talk 17:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, @Codename Noreste... completely forgot about that. Will try to respond shortly. —Ingenuity (t • c) 23:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Vandal TPA
I don't think this one needs talk page access . DoNotRevertThisEditOrI'llFartOnYou TornadoLGS (talk) 19:18, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done. —Ingenuity (t • c) 19:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
As should have been completely expected, my preferred version of the article received unanimous support from the talk page, only to immediately come under attack by IPs that refuse to participate in any discussion. Can you pitch in to keep the established consensus version up? Thank you. Orchastrattor (talk) 03:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like the page has been protected now. Let me know if it resumes after the protection ends. —Ingenuity (t • c) 13:03, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Continued sockpuppetry vandalism on Infanticide
Hi Ingenuity, you had blocked several SPAs (among them Damogert) and IP ranges for repeated sockpuppet-based vandalism on Infanticide, but the vandalism has since continued, by 82.76.117.96, Hagesolt, Dasoject: [2], [3], [4], [5]. Hagesolt is already blocked, but maybe you could block the others too? I would also suggest semi-protecting the article, since I suppose that'll be the only way to hopefully stop the vandalism. Thanks, Gawaon (talk) 13:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- The other user's been blocked, and I've protected the page for a couple months. —Ingenuity (t • c) 14:44, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! Gawaon (talk) 14:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2024
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging