User talk:Inka 888/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Warn

Lol, sorry for the warning conflict.--IGeMiNix (talk) 18:50, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

No worries. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 18:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Your monobook.js

Fixed. Now try purging again. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 21:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm Back!!!

I'm back.--intelati^(Call) 22:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

RfA !votes

Hi Inka. I notice you're a very prolific !voter in RfA's, but I can't recall that you've ever voted "oppose". Am I mistaken? Also, it's probably better to add some text explaining why you're !voting the way you are, rather than just to say "support", as you did here. Thanks,  – OhioStandard (talk) 23:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

He is entitled to only !vote for those he supports, you know. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I usually don't get involved in rfa's that I would oppose, I have been Neutral on a few. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 00:25, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. The "talkback" wasn't necessary, btw: when you entered edit mode on my talk page you would have been presented with an "attention" message saying so.  – OhioStandard (talk) 03:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Sure he is, Elen. But to be perfectly candid, I'm just very uneasy that Inka seems so very focused on all things admin. I'm thinking of the out-of-the-gate userbox "This user isn't an admin, but acts like one", the hugely persistent and very disruptive push for rollback, his attempt to close an RfA, his having !voted in roughly 20 RfA's for users he's probably not familiar with, without a single oppose and nothing like enough time on most or all (imo, based on the timing of his edits) to familiarize himself with an unknown candidate's background sufficiently before !voting. The single word "Sure" !votes, after only a three-minute look into someone's history, in some cases, don't inspire me with confidence, either.

And more generally, I have to question how qualified someone with so short a history is to evaluate whether an unfamiliar user will make a sound admin. I know Inka is allowed to do most or all of these things he has, but why so compelling an interest, and why start !voting so much in RfA's after being here for little over a month? It's all just a bit troubling to me, and I was wondering whether all the "support" !votes could possibly be motivated by a sort of vicarious wish-fulfillment thing. Sorry, Inka, I don't like criticizing you or anyone else, and I do think your wish to help with the infrastructure here is commendable. No one would be more pleased than I to see you eventually meet the standards for adminship. I just think both you and the project might be better served by taking your eyes off that prize for a while. Best,  – OhioStandard (talk) 03:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I never entered edit mode on your talk page I use "easy talkback", I also have been here for over two months I got here on July, 17, 2010 My time July, 18, 2010 UTC time. Before I vote on a rfa I read the questions for the candidate, and check their edit count, and take a look at their recent activity; I'm allowed to !vote in rfa's and I'm entitled to my opinion. Regards, --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 18:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

You have new messages (last change).

/ƒETCHCOMMS/ 00:42, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Raw code

Click the Edit/View source tab on the top of the page.--intelati^(Call) 00:42, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Spam

I'm hesitant to say no. but It would be COI. If it is the blocked user I saw you talking to, I would have to say no, but he's on a tight leash so it would be extremely difficult to do. Sooo. all that to say Toss Up--intelati^(Call) 00:57, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

So you wouldn't recommend telling that user that? --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 01:34, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

1. I wouldn't recommend saying that, but either ask another person or using your discretion on that.
2. the rollback vs. a normal revert is pretty much done, and it molded into the Conflict discussion
3. Fetchcomms seems pretty annoyed, so lay off of him for a while. --intelati^(Call) 02:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Lupin

Are you using the New Skin? [1]?--intelati^(Call) 02:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Ok now hit CTRL+SHIFT+R, and it should work, It works on Chrome for me.--intelati^(Call) 03:01, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I use vector skin, it still does not do anything. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 03:07, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm... I use Google Chrome, hit Shift+f5 (the cache bypass for my browser) and worked on the first try, Which browser are you using?--intelati^(Call) 03:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Firefox --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 03:10, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Read Wikipedia:Clear_your_cache#Mozilla_family--intelati^(Call) 03:12, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Wait a minute... you add Lupin's AVT to your monobook.js yet you use vector? That explains why it wasn't working... Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:19, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I figured that out and then I put it in my vector.js page. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 03:21, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Delete it from you monobook page.--intelati^(Call) 03:22, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

 Done but still  Not done. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 03:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Or just add

importScript('User:Inka 888/monobook.js');

to your vector.js file. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Without the pre tags..right?

Yes. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

But that won't work with a blank monobook.js. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I tried using it with chrome because I have it on my other computer, and it still did not work. I'm giving up. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 14:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Test

This page has 10 vandalisms on it. Find them and win a Prize!!! --intelati^(Call) 04:24, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I think I removed the vandalism. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 15:44, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Pretty much all of it, but the article was too long, I'll do another one for you.--intelati^(Call) 15:46, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Same thing Here.--intelati^(Call) 15:49, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

 Done Inka⁸⁸⁸ 16:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Use the history to check yourself.--intelati^(Call) 16:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Seems to be done. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 16:16, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

How would you come to that conclusion?--intelati^(Call) 16:17, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

because it just seems like a page that needs cleanup now, not a test page. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 16:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

See This dif--intelati^(Call) 16:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I saw it. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 16:29, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Inka, look at the article. Does it look right? Do the tags and infobox look right? Is it possible that you have just reverted an edit that contained a correction as well as a vandalism? Elen of the Roads (talk) 18:00, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

In this edit you moved added some new information which was wrong not included in the previous versions. The information you added is wrong. Can you spot it? Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 18:34, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I think I removed some things by accident. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 18:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes you did and that was part of the infobox. To fix the infobox the best thing to do is go to history and see the first version by Intelati when the infobox was still there. Then go to your latest version and compare it to the first version and see what's missing. But also you moved something which was wrong instead of deleting it (I rephrased above). Can you find the wrong info and delete it? Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 18:48, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Case reopened. Moved from archive--intelati^(Call) 23:05, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Good move Intelati. Thank you. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 23:19, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Your welcome, thought you guys would finish up while I'm gone. Guess not. :)--intelati^(Call) 23:21, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I guess when the mentor's away.... Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 23:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

9/27/2010

Start by finishing this "test" I just got back from an apointment and need to eat, soo... Give me till 3:15 UTC--intelati^(Call) 02:15, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Will do. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 02:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Also, given our discussion yesterday about CSD, would you care to venture a look at User:Access_Denied/CSD_Examples#Example_17. Would you tag this, and if so in what category? --Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

A1 --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 14:35, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Could you explain why you would choose that category? --Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:37, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Article contains a fully completed and wikilinked taxobox, and the single sentence †Heterosubulitidae is an extinct taxonomic family of sea snails, marine opisthobranch gastropod mollusks in the informal group Lower Heterobranchia. While I sympathise that most of the wording in this very short article is taxonomic, why is it lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article, which is plainly some kind of extinct sea snail? This was something of a trick question, which was why I asked whether you would tag it. Project Gastropod have added around 15,000 similar articles (although in fairness to them, they do use a reference, which I stripped out of this one). Perhaps reading WP:STUB would help - very short articles are allowed on Wikipedia, provided you can work out what they are about.--Elen of the Roads (talk) 15:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

This page: User:Intelati/test/1 has been left in a bad state and has not been fixed yet. Intelati has left it as an assignment and I provided instructions on how to fix it. This test is important because it needs navigation through history and comparison of revisions to fix it, as well as careful reading of the text and critical thinking. If Inka is to be trusted with reverting all forms of vandalism and not only the simplest forms, he should IMO successfully complete this vandalism-elimination/correction test. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 16:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't know to do it without rewriting everything that was removed I don't have a tool that will revert more than one edit. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 23:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

View a good revision, click edit, and save. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 23:33, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Go to history and see this: "(cur | prev) 11:47, 25 September 2010 Intelati (talk | contribs) (2,804 bytes) (←Created page with '{{BLP IMDB-only refimprove|date=July 2010}} {{Infobox actor | name = Jordan Todosey | image = | caption = | birthdate = {{bda|1995|...')" Press the "cur" button to compare with the latest (current) version and see what's missing from the infobox. That'll fix the infobox. Also see if the person is dead or not. I don't think she is. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 23:43, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

think it's done. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 23:53, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

::::I hate to disappoint you but it is not done. Can you follow my instructions and get this diff? Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 23:55, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

::::Look on the left and on the right of the diff. Can you fix the right side based on what's missing when compared to the left side? Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 23:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Are you talking about the date of birth and date of death being the same day. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 23:59, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

That's one mistake. But also you have to fix the infobox. Look how it looked when Intelati created the page: [2]. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 00:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Look at the infobox: Her age is 15. How can she be in a category: "deceased people"? Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 00:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't see where it says that. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 00:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Because you fixed it. I was referring to the edit before your last [3]. It is much better now. I think you got it. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 00:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

However instead of doing all these edits you could have gone to history and reverted back to the last good version which was the very first edit that Intelati made. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 00:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

For some reason I was not thinking about, I know I could of done it that way. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 00:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

As long as you keep this in mind for next time it will be ok. Thanks for trying so hard. Take care. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 00:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Will Work up a new one for tomorrow. BTW, Thanks Dr.K for all the help:)--Talktome^(Intelati) 01:23, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

You are very welcome Intelati. You get most of the credit though. :) Thanks for the great examples. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 01:31, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

9/29/2010

A little bit trickier, but same concept. Here.--Talktome^(Intelati) 18:12, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

 Done. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 21:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

very good - although I think you need to look a little more closely at the items in the infobox that are not currently showing up in the article. Some vandals love to hide their work in this way. By way of a follow up, I have edited it again - pretend only the last edit (the one with the summary) is me, the others are a vandal. Would you be able to remove the vandalism but still leave my good edit? --Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Actually, originally, even I was puzzled by this as well. I actually fixed it in the last edit by me. (I made sure to fix it in the original article as well :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 22:12, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

I take it you copied a vandalised version of the infobox without realising it??? Inka reverted to the original version, not noticing that you had fixed some vandalism as well as adding some extras. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

See here !!!!!--Talktome^(Intelati) 22:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

I just figured that out before you told me. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 22:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

 Done Inka⁸⁸⁸ 22:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Almost. The vandal didn't add weight and measurements to the template (they must use it for wrestlers, or models or something) so those could have stayed, although you would never use them normally, but did add "Eurobabe index". Also, you've left one of my vandal edits in. Well done for retaining the good edit I made.Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:29, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Well done, you've got it this time :) Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:38, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Care to have a go at User:Access_Denied/CSD_Examples#Example_18. Would you tag it, and if so, what would you tag it as.Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:37, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

A3 --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 22:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Well done. Contains nothing but a rephrasing of the title and a link (a duff one in this case).Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Your warning at User_talk:166.137.138.125

Your warning at User_talk:166.137.138.125 seems to have a link to your edits, rather than to the IP's. David Biddulph (talk) 23:29, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Inka currently does not use Twinkle, so he has to hand insert the diff when using a warning template. Looking at the IP's track record, I can't see that it made a great deal of difference to the outcome :) :) --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

I have no idea what either of you are talking about. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 23:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

At User_talk:166.137.138.125 there is a warning which you added. In that warning are the words "your recent edits", with a link to Special:Contributions/Inka_888. If you are placing such a warning on an IP's talk page, the link should point to the IP's edits, hence it should have been to Special:Contributions/166.137.138.125. David Biddulph (talk) 00:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

I fixed the warning so in the future it won't do that. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 00:05, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Ice Cube

The album was released on the 28th, today is the 29th. The IP editor was correct. Be careful of these things. Thanks--Talktome^(Intelati) 02:34, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

I was more concerned about the other edits that user made. I agree I should not of reverted it. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 02:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Favor

Can you create this page for me please, It's for the Monthly and most edited pages in here. Thanks.--Talktome^(Intelati) 04:06, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm confused as to what you want me to do. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 23:19, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Create the page with anything. I.E. Hit edit then put "ajkdfgh;" in it. It shows your Monthly and most edited pages in an edit counter.--Talktome^(Intelati) 23:26, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Inka 888. You have new messages at Airplaneman's talk page.
Message added 00:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia:Userboxes

Wikipedia:Userboxes--Talktome^(Intelati) 01:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

How do you do the code. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 01:30, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure exactly how, but use your sandbox to experiment. That's what I do anyway. :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 01:31, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

The basic code works like this: {{Userbox |id = this is what shows up on the left side |info = this is what shows up on the right side |id-c = the background color of the left side |info-c the background color of the right side }} For example: {{Userbox |id = [[File:Cheese.png|70px]] |info = Cheese is good. |id-c = orange |info-c = red }} will look like this:

Cheese is good.

Hope this helps. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 01:37, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

How do you turn it into a short code. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 01:57, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Make a new page with that code, then people can use the brackets to show the userboxen.--Talktome^(Intelati) 02:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

this how it should look. That's an example; should I just put the user box on page and then save it? Inka⁸⁸⁸ 02:11, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

You could use {{User Meta-Wiki}}, but yes. Kind of like your vandislism template, but without using the "subst:" --Talktome^(Intelati) 02:14, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

2,000This user has made over 2,000 contributions to the english Wikipedia.

is the user box I made, would I just {{User:Inka888 2,000}}? --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 02:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

I would use {{User:Inka_888/2,000}} Copy the code to this page, then use the showing code on your user page.--Talktome^(Intelati) 02:19, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Should I put that on the page with the user box? Will it create a blue link with {{User:Inka_888/2,000}}? --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 02:28, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes, and yes. Talktome^(Intelati) 02:32, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

this how it should look? --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 02:40, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

{{User:Inka 888/2,000}} Yes.--Talktome^(Intelati) 02:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh...Ok, first time. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 02:46, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Minor edits

The Ip's are Anonymous, so each edit they make must be carefully screened. On the other hand, the minor edits are suppose to be non controversial.--Talktome^(Intelati) 22:07, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

So it's to catch unconstructive edits from? IPs --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 22:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Pretty much. :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 22:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 22:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Err...

Did you mean to do this?  :) Everard Proudfoot (talk) 02:18, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

No;there was an edit conflict, we were both trying to revert the page at the same time. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 02:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Thought as much.  :) Everard Proudfoot (talk) 02:24, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

ANI

Could you please address Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Could_somebody_please_clear_my_name.3F? Everard Proudfoot (talk) 02:35, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Link Rot

It's fine right now, check back in a month, then the link rot might be a problem--Talktome^(Intelati) 02:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

If you put {{linkrot}} on the page it would say bare URL's as references which appears to be relevant now. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 02:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

Would you use rollback if the edits were questionable? I.e. not exactly vandalism, but also not exactly constructive.--Talktome^(Intelati) 05:35, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Depends on the case in a very rare situation where a page got badly messed up by multiple edits I might. In almost every case I would use the undo or manually revert. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 16:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

That exactly right. :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 16:54, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Archiving

I like a smaller Archive, so things are easy to find, but ultimately it is your choice. the 445k is a fine compromise, but I wouldn't go any bigger than that. Thanks.--Talktome^(Intelati) 21:48, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

WP:TW

Friendly is apart of Twinkle now. :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 04:38, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Ok --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 16:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Are you really sure about this?

You just set your max archive size to 850K. That's probably a bad idea, because long pages like that cause Internet Explorer to crash. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:43, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Just internet explorer or any browser? I use firefox. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 03:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Just internet explorer. I also use firefox, but about 47% of wikipedia users use internet explorer. Back when I used it, loading any page larger than about 150K would cause major slowdown. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

100K is already pretty long; that's past 80 average-length sections. It's not the browser that's the issue, it's the Internet speed. Yes, IE sucks, but if your page is just 200KB, it would take many users 10 minutes or more to load. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 21:08, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

...and your archives are not just for you, they're for admins and others too. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

I understand that but look at this archive it took me 15 seconds to load that page. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 22:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Took me 30 seconds, but that's not the problem. On firefox, it runs completely smoothly, but on IE8, it was very annoying how much scrolling lag there was. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:37, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

I have it set at 445K right now should I make it lower? --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 03:43, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Probably yes, but thats up to you.--Talktome^(Intelati) 03:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

I'd set it to 300K as a bare maximum. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

 Done set at 285. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 03:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks--Talktome^(Intelati) 03:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TEMPLATE NAME HERE

Template:TEMPLATE NAME HERE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. cymru lass ^{(hit me up)}⁄_{(background check)} 21:25, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

I gotta ask, what were you doing creating this page with a protected tag? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 22:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Honestly I was confused as to what that page was for.User:Fetchcomms told me to do something with it. It should be deleted there is no reason for it anymore. --Inka⁸⁸⁸ 22:15, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Okie Dokie...remember, when in doubt, ask questions. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 22:22, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Deleted. Airplaneman ✈ 22:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

I didn't ask you to do anything with that. I asked you to replace "TEMPLATE NAME HERE" with the name of the template you wanted to look at. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 16:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

--For crying out loud be careful and don't let your mentor down. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:25, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Seconded. Airplaneman ✈ 01:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Thirded :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 01:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Quadrupled. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 01:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Quinted? Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 03:08, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

OhGodNoNotYetted? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:55, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Afyer a quick skimming of inka's rollback use everything seems fine. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:33, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Congrats, and nice job - keep up the good work!!! ROBERTMFROMLI ^TALK/_CNTRB 18:55, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Reviewing

Reviewing is a new part of Wikipedia and very controversial. I would wait to actually review the articles until we can talk about it. Thanks--Talktome^(Intelati) 01:36, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

WP:BLP Violations

User:Intelati/test/2 --Talktome^(Intelati) 22:39, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

The death section had vandalism in it. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 00:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Intelati, do not use articles on real subjects to practice on. BLP violations, for testing or not, should exist nowhere, not in userspace or anywhere else. You'll have to make fake articles. Also, when copying content within Wikipedia, you need to attribute it per the terms of the CC-BY-SA. This can be done via a comment in the edit summary, where it will be visible in the history, or you can add a note to the article itself saying where the content came from. See this page for more. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 00:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

I don't know that much about WP:BLP. I thought it was vandalism to a page about a living person, usually saying something defaming to that person. Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 21:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

A typical vandal tactic is to add false information that a living person died. Obviously there will not be a citation to this wrong information. A helpful IP sometimes will come along and remove the false death claim. So if you see death claims without citation you should be aware of possible vandalism. Preferably perform a Google search to verify that the person may still be alive. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 21:43, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Shouldn't I just revert it it? I think it says to do so at WP:BLP to all unsourced claims and rumors on pages about living people. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 22:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Absolutely. First you automatically revert the uncited death claim and then, if you want to make sure, Google anyway just to see if you can find any reliable citation just in case. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 22:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 22:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Don't mention it Inka. It was a pleasure. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 00:10, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Leaving Warning templates

When you leave a warning template (even though it's not required or anything) please consider using the style that references a specific article as in this Unsourced edit welcome... subst:uw-unsourced1|article. You left some Warnings without the article-names recently (for instance, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:199.8.222.105 & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:99.227.180.51). Leaving a Notice/Warning+article-name makes it easier for other editors to follow-up on particular edits and also reminds the errant editor exactly where they have made their mistakes. Just a thought, Shearonink (talk) 14:55, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

I don't use huggle or any tool like that so I have to type the page name in manually. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 03:37, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

It's not so bad having to type the name in manually. I don't use Huggle either, so that's what I do. Because I like to be make sure the Warning fits the edit, I usually even go to Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace and manually pick out the appropriate Warning for the test/vandal/joke/whatever edit. Shearonink (talk) 10:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

I usually would do type in the name manually. When there is a lot of vandalism and very few vandal fighters, I would not do it because it takes more time. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 18:06, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Questions

First, service awards are awards that you give yourself for your contributions. don't focus on them as they are just for fun. :)

Second, Huggle is often faster than plain roll back becuse you can see the diff without switching windows. other than that, the only differences between that and the recent changes, is that Huggle warns the person, and the edits are automatically updated.--Talktome^(Intelati) 01:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

I was just wondering about the service awards because I was unclear as to how they worked. Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 02:41, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) You can find your total number of contributions here: [4] and you can find the appropriate service award by going here: [5] - your current level is 3 (Journeyman Editor), which you can find the templates for here: (Journeyman)[6]. Other awards are generally added by other editors, usually to your talk page, at which point you can decide whether you want to copy them to your user page or not.

If you take a look at my user page (and hit edit) you can see my various userboxes for how I've used the stuff - but I am pretty sure you are familiar with how to do that (you may find a few other userboxes you are interested in though, such as the edit count userbox - which is used like this: {{User contrib|2111|Inka 888}} - with the "2111" being changed as your edit count increases (that's your current edit count, btw)). You have to manually update/change the service level award as your edit count increases (just as you would have to update the edit counter userbox).

Your next level will be reached when you have 4,000+ edits and one or more years of having a registered account.

Hope that helps. Best, Robert ROBERTMFROMLI ^TALK/_CNTRB 03:41, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

But beware, many editors suffer from WP:EDITCOUNTITIS. It's quality that counts, not quantity. There's no race, no prize. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:40, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

I suffer from silly things like adding decimal places to my edit count userbox. I think it was at 2345.0587 at some point a couple weeks ago... then .05 and now .1 ;-) But Bwilkins makes the most valid point regarding edit counts that I have ever seen. Heck I take days off at a time when I've been doing late nights and am afraid I will screw up reverting. ROBERTMFROMLI ^TALK/_CNTRB 15:40, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

I to make about 50 edits a day, I think most of my edits are good quality edits. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 21:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

What was this?

Other than being a fairly obvious BLP violation, unsourced death rumor, and vandalism, was there any reason why you restored this? /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 16:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

And you templated the IP for vandalism (even though it was only a level one warning). You need to apologise. Note that the bot tagging for section blanking is not sentient. It cannot tell why someone blanked the section. Even if an edit is tagged, you still need to read it. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:39, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

 Done I apologized to the IP. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 21:38, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Blanking is a weak spot. We may need some mentoring examples. Is Intelati ready with some exercises? Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 22:01, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

It seems I come a little late? :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 22:15, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

We may have a final few chances :) See also my edit-conflict comment below. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 22:19, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

WP:BLP violations. Hmmmm... How to teach?... I'll work up another example. At User:Intelati/test/2--Talktome^(Intelati) 22:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict) In addition the granting of rollback was conditional on being rescinded after five bad reverts. With this being a bad revert there are four more chances remaining. Unfortunately it does sound like a bad video game but the rollback-granting terms have to be upheld. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 22:19, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

I have added somewhat of a "counter" of Inka's remaining chances above at User talk:Inka_888#Rollback Restriction. Hopefully, this will be a visible reminder for him as well. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 10:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

That does not need to be there, it is not a restriction. It's called rollback not "rollbackers". --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 17:25, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Then you can "police" yourself, I take it. People will be keeping count though. Oh and when I hover your name, it says "rollbacker", but that is semantics. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:09, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Rollback rights, user group: rollbackers. Little thing does not really matter. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 00:13, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

That's is why it is called semantics. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Inka 888. You have new messages at Eagles247's talk page.
Message added 21:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

UserSpace templates.

What do you want to change (make) exactly?--Talktome^(Intelati) 03:11, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

It's not a big deal, don't waste your time making my userpage look pretty. It actually looks good now. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 04:21, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

I userfied User:Inka 888/3,000 edits. Personal templates do NOT go into "Template:" space. Also, the subpage character is /, not \. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 12:44, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

I moved the other one I made a while back, that was a template. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 17:46, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia

Hi. What is wikipedia?

If your being serious, read Wikipedia --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 22:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Good reply. And if the IP is not serious they should also read WP:BLOCK if they continue on their current path. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 22:57, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

It sounded a little fishy, I gave them the benefit of the doubt. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 22:59, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

I did too at first. Until I checked their contributions. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 23:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User Inka 888/5,000 edits

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cindamuse (talk) 03:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Inka 888. You have new messages at Talk:User Inka 888/5,000 edits.
Message added 03:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

User Inka 888/5,000 edits

I am wondering what you were trying to do here. If you were trying to make a userbox for an edit count, that has already been done for you. You can add the following userbox code to you page and keep an active edit count. {{user contrib|2259|Inka 888}} The "2259" is your current edit count. I normally go in hundreds, some go in thousands, so you don't have to update it daily or hourly, but that is up to you. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:06, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

I think Inka 888 was simply playing with templates and tried creating it in his userspace (and forgot the colon). It's located here now: User:Inka_888/5,000_edits. Simple accident it seems. ROBERTMFROMLI ^TALK/_CNTRB 05:31, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

I kinda figured, but wanted to make sure. He really doesn't need seperate boxes, with the code I linked above. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

It was a typo. Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 15:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

2nd Account

Yes, it would be fine, but make sure you have a strong password. AKA, at least 12 characters with at least 1 number or special character.--Talktome^(Intelati) 22:35, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Would i have to inform someone about the account? --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 22:37, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

See WP:Multiple Accounts on the instrutions for multiple accounts.--Talktome^(Intelati) 22:40, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

If I already have a very strong password on this account, would it really matter? --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 22:43, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Probably not, especially if you create yourself a WP:HASHKEY. That way, if someone hacks the account, you can verify that you are Inka and they are not. Admins tend to have second accounts for cybercafes, hotel internets and iPhones, so there's no risk of someone hacking the account with the tools. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC) That's Template:User committed identity. Tells you all you need to know.

I'll hold off on making a second account for now. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 22:59, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Reflist

This is wrong. the "|colwidth=30em" allows the browser to pick how many columns. This is a "new" way to do this. Keep this in mind. :)

200something references on that page. I understand doing it the other way with less but in this case all it does is make the page longer than it needs to be. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 03:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Depending on the with of the monitor, the length will change. This is the accepted way now.--Talktome^(Intelati) 03:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Wasn't thinking about that; I'm using my netbook today. Guess it looked good to me and that's all I thought about. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 03:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

just keep that in mind. :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 03:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Inka 888/sandbox 2

Looks like you're designing a new signature, but you'll need to get it below 256 bytes to be usable. Looks like there's lots of unused code though that i could clean out. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 04:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm still working on it, I just took a break from it. --Inka^{888Come yell at me!} 04:11, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism

Usually, the IP warnings expire each month. So if the warnings are still "Valid" start there, if not, start a new 1-4 set.--Talktome^(Intelati) 23:09, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

What about this case? Inka888^ContribsTalk 02:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Thats fine. It was actually a ".gov" IP address. :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 15:37, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Huggle

Thats fine, just don't use it until October 18, 0:00 UTC (Wikipedia) time.--Talktome^(Intelati) 21:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

One more thing, I will give you a 5 bad reverts per week restriction. Please be careful and try not to even come close to that please. Thanks, and good work. :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 01:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Friend

Looks Like you got your first "Friend." :) Don't take it personally, just take is as an excuse to do more damage on the vandals. :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 03:31, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Friend, not freind. And don't take it personally inka, just look at the history of my talkapge. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:32, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

I figured it would happen sooner or later. I don't really care what vandals say to me. Inka888^ContribsTalk 03:34, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

First day on the job, and already got a flamer. :) That has to be some sort of record. :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 03:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Actually the second. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

I mean the first "F#)&*^ you" person. :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 03:38, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Good job

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You're doing a great job patrolling recent changes! :DNetalarmtalk 21:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Inka888^ContribsTalk 21:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Notification

I have started an discussion suggesting that you be removed from the twinkle blacklist on AN/I. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 04:12, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Shiny object!

		Sven Manguard's "Completely Safe" Irradiated Barnstar
		Not content with distributing ordinary barnstars, I have illegally enriched several ordinary barnstars, for the purposes of rewarding others for outstanding individual achievement. Congratulations, you have just been awarded one of these rare treasures. They glow in the dark, yes, but I'm sure they are perfectly safe. For removing vadalism from my userspace. The IP was right though, that entire thread was retarded. Thanks, Sven Manguard Talk 00:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Inka888^ContribsTalk 00:09, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

No problem! Keep up the good work, and good luck with the twinkle thing. Sven Manguard _Talk 00:16, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Cheers! --Addihockey10 04:04, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Your welcome. Inka888^ContribsTalk 04:05, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Edit Notices

See here, but you have to be an Administrator, or an Account Creator to edit them.--Talktome^(Intelati) 05:29, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I knew about admins and account creators so I really didn't need a link. I did not know that one would have to those rights to create an edit notice. Inka888^ContribsTalk 00:06, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Actually anyone can make edit notices for their own user or user talk. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 01:44, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

How? Inka888^ContribsTalk 01:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Hit the new section on the top of your talk page and on the top right (using vector) corner there is a "Page Notice" link. Click that link and start that page. Talktome^(Intelati) 02:10, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I want to use this this as my image. How do I get it from commons? Inka888^ContribsTalk 02:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Here's the Commons. But Just use the basic picture santax and you are fine.Talktome^(Intelati) 02:22, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I actually just figured it out after I asked the question. Thanks for the help though. Also after I finish making my edit notice, do I just save the page and it show my edit notice from then on? Inka888^ContribsTalk 02:27, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes.Talktome^(Intelati) 02:28, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

 Done Inka888^ContribsTalk 02:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Looks good.Talktome^(Intelati) 02:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Inka888^ContribsTalk 02:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Inka 888. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page.
Message added 14:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: October 2010

Hello, Inka 888. You have new messages at Download's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

See here. 9 Left, at least only two more days of the week left.--Talktome^(Intelati) 01:42, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

See my response on downloads talk page. Inka888^ContribsTalk 01:44, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I got like 5 of those on one day once. hence my relaxed standards. :)--Talktome^(Intelati) 01:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations!

You how now been removed from the Twinkle blacklist! Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Inka888^ContribsTalk 04:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

igloo

I wrote a JavaScript that adds a "launch igloo" button next to the "my watchlist" link. Just go to your skin file and add the following javascript:

addOnloadHook(function () {
addPortletLink( "p-personal", 
 wgServer + wgScriptPath + "/index.php?title=User:Ale jrb/Scripts/igloo/init",
 "launch igloo", "pt-igloo", "launch igloo",
 "i", document.getElementById("pt-watchlist"));
});

(do not add the source tags)

Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 16:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

It worked. Thanks, Inka888^ContribsTalk 17:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry for reverting the edit that you reverted because I don't know how to use GLOO very well. Wayne Olajuwon chat 17:48, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

It's fine. I just started using it last night, and it did the same thing to me. Inka888^ContribsTalk 17:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

FYI

The Utahraptor is not a vandal. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 18:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I know. Inka888^ContribsTalk 18:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

8--TalkToMe_c^intelati 18:35, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Mistake

this looks like a mistake after looking at the revision, seems like you reverted the Utahraptor's revert. Derild4921☼ 18:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Nvm, seem like you realized that. Derild4921☼ 18:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Status

Hmmm... Let me go search.TalkToMe_c^intelati 21:36, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Complicated. How I would do it is the same way Nascar1996 (talk · contribs) does it. First Create a page called User:Inka 888/status, then create a page called User:Inka 888/Floating Buttons... Never mind, do you what me to do it for you?TalkToMe_c^intelati 21:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

A couple questions:

1.Which one would I create first?

2.What would I start the pages with?

Inka888^ContribsTalk 21:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) One thing you could try is Qui. That's what I use. Create a status subpage at User:Inka 888/Status with "online" as the content. Then, add {{Statustop}} to the top of your talk page. Next, add the Qui script to your monobook or vector.js. And that's it. Simple as that. The Utahraptor^{Talk to me}/_{Contributions} 21:50, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Inka888^ContribsTalk 21:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

TOP

it means you have the most recent edit on that page. very useful sometimes. :)--TalkToMe_c^intelati 00:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

So it goes away after someone else edits the page? Inka888^ContribsTalk 01:26, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes. Useful if your looking for someone to reply to your post, or situations like that.--TalkToMe_c^intelati 01:29, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Inka888^ContribsTalk 01:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Fermentelos

Hello Inka 888. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fermentelos, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:21, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

this is all it said in the article when I saw it. I noticed the user added a bit to it after I tagged it. I said A1 because there was nothing to back up what s/he said. If you look at "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh" that is the example of A1 at WP:SD; how is what that user wrote different? Inka888^ContribsTalk 02:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

It's a super-stub, but it does identify the subject ("Fermentelos is a town in Portugal.") If you don't think the town is notable, I guess you can try PROD or an AfD. I'm not even sure whether we have notability guidelines for cities and towns. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:36, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

(Came across this from TigreTiger's talkpage) I've been on NPP tonight; even if there's no actual policy violation here, it's making our job tremendously difficult. It's flooding Special:NewPages, and making it very hard to properly patrol everything. As far as I know, towns and cities are inherently notable, but if you ask me, mass creating sub-stubs like this (I've seen it a few times before, from far more experienced users) borders on disruptive. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 02:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

AFD. Inka888^ContribsTalk 02:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Do not go back down this road, Inka. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 04:55, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes. Please. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 04:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

...and do not insist to others that they must create only larger articles, as you did on TigreTiger's talkpage. Doing so is very WP:BITEy and is not within policy. WP:STUBs are fine. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 05:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Like I've said before try to stick to G3s and G10s for a little while. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 05:26, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

I know that stubs are fine, but please note that this was all that was in the article when I saw it. Inka888^ContribsTalk 18:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Would you please learn to keep discussions in one place for crying out loud. When you left a message on my talkpage, it even warns you to keep them together. Now, go to my userpage, down to the stubs created - tell me if any of them are that much different from what Tigre created? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:49, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

I apologize for moving the discussion. If you were looking for information about a place, and you looked it up on Wikipedia would you like to read and article with five words in it (three of them being articles}? I looked at WP:SD, and there was an example of A1 which was "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh." How is that any different than "Fermentelos is a town in Portugal."? Inka888^ContribsTalk 19:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

It's a little different. The information provided is factual (or presumed to be so - which is easily verifiable with a simple web search) and explains one of the most important parameters of a city (where it is). That makes it a valid stub. Your example, OTOH, is POV (first part) and hard to verify (second part). Totally different scenarios. See my note on BWilken's talk page for more (sorry about that B... feel free to move the comment here if you like - didnt find this discussion till after I left the comment). Best, Rob ROBERTMFROMLI ^TALK/_CNTRB 20:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

No issues Robert, TPS's are good :-). Inka ... check this stub. What's really different from what Tigre created? Your job as an editor is to edit - and knowing that towns are inherently notable, would it have killed you to add a half of a sentence? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:16, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

I not that different. In the future I'll tag articles for expansion if they are really small. Inka888^ContribsTalk 21:52, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

• WP:DEFACTO: 99.9% of all articles about populated cities/towns/etc., fully professional athletes, and species are kept, stub or not. I strongly advise you to withdraw your AfD nomination and be much more judicious in your CSD work. "Too short" is not a valid rationale when the article establishes the subject and context. Considering that you are still being mentored, I hope that you will read, re-read, and re-read a second time, the relevant policy. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 05:03, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

• Oh, and just tagging an article is unhelpful. Either you expand it yourself, or you move on. Don't create more backlogs and work for others. Sources are not hard to find. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 05:04, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Arbitrary break

Also please read the WP:GNG and all it's subsets. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 05:23, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Pictures

Nope, No valued pictures here, just the {{Pic of the day}} template. :)--TalkToMe_c^intelati 03:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

How are they selected? Inka888^ContribsTalk 03:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

First read this, then they are selected though peer review, grueling actually. I've seen pictures better than some Time magazine covers fail this. :)--TalkToMe_c^intelati 03:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I was talking about Valued pictures not featured pictures. Inka888^ContribsTalk 03:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Ok then this and this.TalkToMe_c^intelati 03:17, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Tomorrows topic CSD, and XfD

I can see we will need a crash course in CSD tomorrow.--TalkToMe_c^intelati 05:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

If you want, I'll help you out too; I've been at this for several months, and I pretty much know what I'm doing. NPP is my specialty, and there aren't many people doing it, so we'd love for someone else to step in and lighten the workload a bit. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 05:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

If your here at around 15-20 wikipedia time chime in whenever you like. :)--TalkToMe_c^intelati 05:21, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I should be around for a couple of those hours at least. In fairness to Inka888 on this, the situation tonight was a bit strange; I wouldn't expect anyone even relatively new to NPP to have been able to figure out what to do. I guess you'll hear from me then. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 05:25, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

I'll probably be on until about 8-9 UTC. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 05:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

• I'd be willing to help you out, as well. I've been NPPing since June, so I can name most, if not all, of the CSD criteria by memory. The Utahraptor^{Talk to me}/_{Contributions} 05:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

(ec x 2) :this page may be useful. please do add more but remember to remove names of people on attack pages. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 05:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

WP:WIHS is a must-read if you haven't read it yet. Airplaneman ✈ 05:34, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

NPPers, you may find this helpful as it adds a few helpful quick links at the top of the screen. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 05:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Deletions

First, anything about city's, counties, or any government designated entity are immune from any deletion. See here for a more through explanation. A little short on time today, more will follow shortly.--TalkToMe_c^intelati 21:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Even if the article says some thing like this for example:

"Pleasantville is a town in bullshit county tons of people go to have sex and kill each other every 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999...........................00000000000000000088888888888 milliseconds..................blablablablablablabalblabla.......................I really hate the town.

Inka888^ContribsTalk 03:22, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Then you would replace it with something like "X is a town in X country" and give the creator a {{subst:uw-create3}} warning. (I start with level 3 for created pages like that) Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:51, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

That's almost word for word what I was going to say before we edit conflicted... get out of my head!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:52, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

But of course, if you come across something that's obviously fake (e.g. Liechtenslavia is a town of 100 million people in Kyrgyzstan), that would be G3. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:54, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion: Lesson #1

Ok, I'm going to start with the simplest: G1, G3, and G10.

G1

Patent nonsense. There are 2 types:

1. Random banging on the keyboard like this:

r67tbg9wn4 tg2wn9596g5t8959ntwv5m098b3w5t lololol n5 tr 8tojjhai der

2. Random words that make no sense together. like this:

Salas eat monkey poo that banana have lol Mario hi there bobjoe how is my puppy

G3

Pure vandalism like these:

I suck cocks. I suck cocks. I suck cocks. I suck cocks. I suck cocks. I suck cocks. I suck cocks. I suck cocks. I suck cocks. I suck cocks. I suck cocks. 

or blatant hoaxes:

I live inside mount everest and kill people on who like pie.

G10

Attack pages Admins watch the "attack pages" category and will often delete them in seconds. Examples:

johnny is a gay faggot

Or this:

sammy the stupid was born in 37857887275 B.C. and then went through three sex changes and then raped himself and died. The end.

That's all for lesson 1.

Your assignment

Go to User:Access Denied/CSD Examples and list all the G1's, G3's, and G10's in the space below. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 22:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

G1's

• Example 16
• Example 13

13: Correct. 16: Yes but also a G10 and G10 takes precedence.

I don't see how G10 takes place there. Inka888^ContribsTalk 22:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

You could tag that with db-multiple if you wanted, but you don't have to worry about that now. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

G3's

• Example 15
• Example 9

Both correct. Example 2 is also a G3 as a blatant hoax. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 22:25, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

G10's

• Example 8

Yes, but there are more. I'll get to that later. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 22:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

That's what I found so far. Inka888^ContribsTalk 22:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Note that we don't need to go over G8 I use G8 a lot and it's pretty self explanatory. Inka888^ContribsTalk 22:29, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I wasn't planning om it anyway. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 22:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

That one Is kind of obvious. :)--TalkToMe_c^intelati 22:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

WSPA project page

I'm not sure why you've done what you have with the WSPA page. It'd be great if you would join the project so you could do a lot of productive stuff. I blanked a page that because it was redundant. If I knew how to delete it, I would have just done that. This page replaces it Wikipedia:WSPA/Get started. --RichardMcCoy (talk) 02:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

I struck through the warning because it appears that it was not vandalism. If you could use an edit summary when you make large edits, I would much appreciate it. Best, Inka888^ContribsTalk 02:09, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Re:hmm...

Hello, Inka 888. You have new messages at Download's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Account creation Process

Sometimes when a IP range is blocked, some people may be unable to create accounts. So, a person sends out an email to the account creation people and they decide if creating the account is proper. I have created 5 accounts. To create accounts, you have to ... See what Fetchcomms wrote.--TalkToMe_c^intelati 02:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Actually, it's more like people who can't read the captcha, not just rangeblocked IPs. More of those requests go to the unblock-l mailing list, but some go to through ACC (and that's why we have CUs there). /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 22:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Doesn't one need account creater rights to create accounts? Inka888^ContribsTalk 00:28, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

No, the account creater rights are almost exclusively for people who create the daily limit of 6 accounts regularly.--TalkToMe_c^intelati 00:34, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

How do people create accounts for other people? Inka888^ContribsTalk 00:35, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

"See WP:ACC and WP:ACCGUIDE for the internal details."-Fetchcomms --TalkToMe_c^intelati 00:39, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

So I would apply to be involved in the account creation process and then I would be able to create accounts for other users..? Inka888^ContribsTalk 01:02, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes, but in the wise words of Fetchcomms "However, if you are thinking of joining, I would wait..." thanks--TalkToMe_c^intelati 01:26, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

I'll wait 2-4 weeks before thinking of joining. Inka888^ContribsTalk 22:01, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

I rather think Fetchcomms had 6-8 months in mind. Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:11, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it's not really up to fetchcomms. I decided to take his advice and wait a while. I'm not going to wait half a year. Inka888^ContribsTalk 22:18, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Inka, don't take this the wrong way, but the project needs people who create content more than it needs people who fiddle about in the plumbing (we have rather a lot of those). If you're bored click here, and see if you can improve what you see. Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:43, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm not going to "fiddle with the plumbing". I don't make mistakes like I used to. Please provide a time when I was "fiddling around with the plumbing" in the last week. Inka888^ContribsTalk 22:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

I think what Elen is trying to say, the purpose of the ecyclopedia is to expand, not to stay stagnate.--TalkToMe_c^intelati 22:52, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict):::(talk page stalker) Elen is not referring to any past mistakes you may have made or even mistakes in general. All she is saying is that right now content contributors are more needed than maintainence and technical editors such as vandal fighters, which there are a lot of. Derild4921☼ 22:53, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

I wrote an article yesterday. I'm going to write more articles in the future. Inka888^ContribsTalk 22:59, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Good, I would work on mantinence of articles now. Kind of what I did (doing) to Jamie McMurray--TalkToMe_c^intelati 23:00, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry Inka. When I said 'fiddling with the plumbing' I was thinking of Scottie in Star Trek, not making mistakes. Sorry for not being clear about that. Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

I understood that. It came across that you thought I was not serious about the project. If that's not what you meant at all, I appoligize for going on about it. Inka888^ContribsTalk 04:01, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

IMDB

yes, and No. IMDB can be used as a external link, but normally it is not acceptable for a normal source.--TalkToMe_c^intelati 20:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

here are some discussions about that: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 --TalkToMe_c^intelati 20:34, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Popups

If you have "Navigation popups, article previews and editing functions popup when hovering over links" enabled, and are on your watchlist, you can hover over the "diff" button. the Popup will, pop up and there is an "action" button. You can then hit "Revert" and it will use the undo function with out stopping for you to type in your rational. Basically faster than undo, but slower than plain rollback.--TalkToMe_c^intelati 00:06, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

So I hover over an edit and hit undo? Inka888^ContribsTalk 00:07, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

To left of the link that says Undo, is a link that says revert. that one. --TalkToMe_c^intelati 00:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Careful!

Hi Inka, I see you've tagged Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Geomium with {{db-talk}}. I've declined it - see the edit summary for why. The page even had a "review pending" tag on it. Please be careful and ask if you aren't sure. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 02:04, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Then why would they start the project with a talk page instead of putting it on the project page? Also part of G8 is a talk page of a nonexistent main page....right? Inka888^ContribsTalk 03:56, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure if G8 applies to talk pages for wikipedia projects. Inka888^ContribsTalk 19:00, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

If you don't know, then don't do it :-) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:02, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Can G8 apppy to project talk pages? Inka888^ContribsTalk 20:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For removing vandalism at my talk page. Cheers, JNW (talk) 01:58, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

No problem :) Inka888^ContribsTalk 02:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Inka 888. You have new messages at Talk:Pet anoles.
Message added 03:45, 1 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

It's raining thanks spam!

• Please pardon the intrusion. This tin of thanks spam is offered to everyone who commented or !voted (Support, Oppose or Neutral) on my recent RfA. I appreciate the fact that you care enough about the encyclopedia and its community to participate in this forum.
• There are a host of processes that further need community support, including content review (WP:GAN, WP:PR, WP:FAC, and WP:FAR). You can also consider becoming a Wikipedia Ambassador. If you have the requisite experience and knowledge, consider running for admin yourself!
• If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks • Ling.Nut (talk) 02:23, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry your RFA did not succeed. I thought you would of made a good admin. Inka888^ContribsTalk 03:51, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Good Work

Been watching you for a while. Been doing a lot better since our first encounters at ANI. Good Work keep it up The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 12:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Inka888^ContribsTalk 20:04, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

ACC interface request

Requested account on ACC interface. Inka888^ContribsTalk 02:54, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

(inset diety of one's choice) forbid. Just because you have a nice cookie does not mean you should bite off more than you can chew. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:51, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

I believe that I can handle the tools. Inka888^ContribsTalk 17:22, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

The thread below shows otherwise. There are still too many policies you completely misunderstand, and ACC is important enough that you can't f'up like that. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:03, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

There are certain things, I don't know as I'm sure there things that you don't know. I understand the polices. Inka888^ContribsTalk 18:42, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Block template substitution

[7] It does make a difference. Per Templates that should not be substituted, "templates shall not be substituted that (a) contain calls to ParserFunctions (#if, #switch, etc.), unless, where possible, these are substituted too". Template:Blocked user uses ParserFunctions. It's also unnecessary to put so many characters there when you can simply use {{blocked user|historical}}. Goodvac (talk) 04:49, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) On top of that, I can add that "does not make a difference" is not a valid reason to revert. If it doesn't make any difference, the current look can be kept. Also, I believe that the blocked template you substituted was an old version of the real template. HeyMid (contributions) 11:34, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Ok, whatever. I thought the templates did not make a difference. I'm sorry. Inka888^ContribsTalk 17:19, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Also, have you yet noticed the launch button for igloo at the toolbox (at the left side of this page), or are you still using that direct link? HeyMid (contributions) 18:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

It's in my toolbox. Also I have a link to next to my watchlist. Inka888^ContribsTalk 19:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

OK, I was just wondering, as you wrote at HJ Mitchell's talk page about this. HeyMid (contributions) 19:05, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Yeah. It was not working then but it is working now. Inka888^ContribsTalk 19:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

And I'm not sure whether the historical category should be put at A3RO's user page or not. I don't really know in which cases that category should be used. HeyMid (contributions) 19:17, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

I don't know either. I'd think since there was no special reason that he was blocked that you wouldn't. Ask Xeno. Inka888^ContribsTalk 21:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

The historical category should be used, per the description provided by Pathoschild. User:A3RO provides "historical information" about the user. Goodvac (talk) 06:33, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

And edit warring over the bloody thing really was not a smart thing to do. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 02:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I made 3 reverts. Only 2 in a 24 hour period. Inka888^ContribsTalk 02:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I didn't say you violated 3RR, I said you were edit warring. I suggest you read the document carefully. Elen of the Roads (talk) 10:16, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Inka 888. You have new messages at Gfoley4's talk page.
Message added 01:58, 5 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

G1 - Patent nonsense. This excludes articles in a foreign language. Just because you don't speak whatever language it is in does not make it nonsense. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 02:09, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I misread it the G1 criteria. Inka888^ContribsTalk 02:53, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

You "misread...the G1 criteria"?? I watched you have more than 1 lesson on G1 and a similar discussion. This is not about misreading whatsoever. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 08:59, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Remember, there are only two situations in which an article can be tagged as a G1:

• Random banging on the keyboard like this: &:$.!!.!:8,!/ jJxnd shzhzbsvsuzhzzvzhebfbx
• A random string of words that make absolutely no sense together like this: Word face zit party fun fun zombie hitler cocaine

Access Denied – talk to me 14:55, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I understand that. I misread the G1 criteria. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 05:19, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Inka 888. You have new messages at Talk:Michael Welner.
Message added 03:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Just wondering Airplaneman ✈ 03:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Don't worry about the details, Just focus on editing articles. :)--intelati^talk 03:16, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Inka 888. You have new messages at Intelati's talk page.
Message added 19:06, 6 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

as Wilkens said intelati^talk 19:06, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Reviewing

Reviewing acticles in the Special:OldReviewedPages is a very controversial idea by the Wikimedia foundation. The idea, is that the IP's can still edit articles, but the vandalism is weeded out by trusted users like you and me. To review a edit is simple, you hit the link to the Special page, and hit the "(review)" link. you then either hit the Accept button which allows other users to see the edits. Or you can revert it. Be careful though, make sure the usage of words fit's the article, make sure all of the pending edits are free from vandilism Etc. These are all things I have done. Just be careful. :)

Any Questions? --intelati^talk 23:24, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

And on a general note, if you aren't sure what to do, just ask someone else that would know what to do. Thanks.--intelati^talk 23:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

3 questions

1. What about the pages that are PC protected and show up in recent changes with a pending changes tag?
2. Does hitting accept automatically make the revision visible to everyone?
3. What does the unaccept button do?

Inka⁸⁸⁸ 23:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

1. They will show up with a yellow bar that says "Pending Changes"
2. Yes
3. If you see a botched review, just hit unaccept and undo the change.--intelati^talk 05:07, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 22:50, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Spurgeon E. Crayton

You undid the blanking of this article, and I reverted: it was blanked by the only author of the article, and the appropriate course of action is to place a db-author tag on it (CSD G7). Thanks, Drmies (talk) 22:10, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

The author never clearly requested deletion. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 22:12, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

No, but you can't expect a new editor to know those kinds of ins and outs. Please see Wikipedia:CSD_G7#G7. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 22:15, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I'll keep that in mind. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 22:17, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it's one of those things where an act by a relatively new editor is interpreted in a certain way. Sometimes users get frustrated by the process (like if they keep adding unverified BLP stuff, for instance) and they see no other way to get out of it, which is probably what happened here. Now, we can keep reversing and then warning them for blanking/vandalism, and the frustration escalates, and before you know it they're blocked. There's little purpose in that; I'm sure you've seen how quickly someone can get to level 4. I guess in order to prevent such escalations, the G7 guideline asks us to interpret that kind of blanking as "author's request to delete" (unless other editors of course have contributed significantly). Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Show Changes

Basically like Show preview, but with the Diff thingamajig on top. --intelati^talk 02:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

I've never used it. I just use the preview and save buttons. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 02:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Same here --intelati^talk 02:40, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi.

Will you please help mentor me? Airplaneman is gone until 2/2011, and Mono's gone until I don't know when. Reply on my talk. Thanks I.P. (talk) 03:10, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

PROD

PROposed Deletions are for when a article doesn't meet any of the CSD criteria, but the nominator thinks that no other editor would contest the deletion.

Today there are two types of PROD's. The "Sticky PROD" for Unsourced BLP's and the Regular PROD, where the editor writes in their "reason".

Pretty simple. Any Questions?--intelati^talk 03:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

How do you Propose deletion. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 03:57, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Use the "subst {{proposed deletion}}" template, or Click the TW tab and Hit the "PROD" button on the drop down menu.--intelati^talk 04:01, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Huggle and Igloo

What do you think is better:Huggle or Igloo? WAYNEOLAJUWON 22:48, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm waiting for a new version of huggle to come out and I'll try it again then. It was messing up on me before. I like Igloo because I do more than just vandal fighting in a day and it is a simpler tool to work with for short periods of time. When there is a lot of vandalism I usually will use huggle. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 22:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

It depends on how much vandalism there is out there on the time you get on to see which one you will use. Huggle is faster than Igloo, in my opinion, but many ex-Huggle users have permanently went to Igloo. WAYNEOLAJUWON 23:18, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Igloo has never had any problems for me. I reverted download the first time I used it (but that was my fault). Like I said above I'll try huggle again when there is a new version. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 23:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

I know. WAYNEOLAJUWON 01:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

ACC Tool

Someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. Also, if it was you who created the request, you may also wish to the subscribe to the mailing list, which is used for internal discussions between the account creation team. The Helpful One 23:34, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

It was me who made the request. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 23:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

OK, great - it that case I have approved your request for the tool. Please excuse the template below, but it provides some useful links if you'd like to join the mailing list:

Thank you for applying to access the ACC tool. As a tool administrator, I have decided to give you access. You may now utilize the tool here - however, before you do so please read the tool's guide due to the nature of the tool. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on freenode irc, and also join the mailing list Please remember that the ACC tool is powerful, and that misuse may result in your access being suspended by a Tool Administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any questions, and once again welcome to the ACC tool. The Helpful One 23:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Hope this helps - The Helpful One 23:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Oh God, no. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:30, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Not exactly my thoughts but close. Please do be careful. --intelati^talk 01:06, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for your support at my RfA last week. I'll do everything I can to live up to your expectations and if you ever need help from a janitor please feel free to drop me a line! Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 20:59, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Inka 888. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/28bytes#Oppose.
Message added 23:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Colonel Warden RFC/U

FYI - A request for comments has been started on User:Colonel Warden. Since you participated in this ANI thread which preceded this RfC/U, you might be interested in participating. If so, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Colonel Warden. Thanks. SnottyWong ^gossip 00:59, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

The Utahraptor^Talk/_Contribs has given you a Christmas tree! Christmas trees promote WikiLove and are a great way to spread holiday cheer. Merry Christmas!

Spread the WikiLove by adding {{subst:User:The Utahraptor/Christmas tree}} to any editor's talk page with a friendly message.

--The Utahraptor^Talk/_Contribs 03:47, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Happy holidays to you too. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 06:10, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

FYI

Normally English editors don't like it when you Americanize their spellings. :) 28bytes (talk) 05:32, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 00:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Chosen people

Hello! I have a question for you: I noticed that you restored the content of a section dedicated to Islam in the article called Chosen people. I was checking the history of the article and I noticed a version which was overtly propagandistic and written from a islamic point of view, something wikipedia cannot tolerate. Fortunately the section had been removed by an IP user. So I was wondering why did you restore that awful section? Thanks for reading.--Knight1993 (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Because the IP didn't just blank the section. What was there was better than jajajaja. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 17:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Also, it looks like it was fixed by another IP. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 21:59, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Editing ANI posts and labelling editors as vandals

This edit - [8] - was GROSSLY inappropiate. You changed another editors post with no good reason and labelled another editor as a vandal without justification, then compounded the error by marking it as a minor edit. Please don't do this again. Exxolon (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

It's just a template. It is easier to examine the editors edits with that template in place. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 22:57, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

There are a whole bunch of alternative templates at Template:Vandal that have more information all with the "user" prefix - please use one of those instead. That avoids labelling an editor as a vandal - only obvious vandals/vandalism should have vandal templates attached.

Editing another editors posts is generally never a good idea without a damn good reason - if you are going to do it, make sure you post underneath indicating the edit you've performed so it's clear who is responsible for which text without having to go digging through the edit summary. I ended up falsely accusing the original poster of the comment you edited as labelling the other editor as a vandal without justification and I had to apologise for that because of your action. Exxolon (talk) 23:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) (edit conflict) Inka888, the only thing that needs to be done for others to quickly examine an editor's edits is put Rjbronn (talk · contribs). That's {{user|Rjbronn}}, not {{vandal|Rjbronn}}. I would not try to minimize what you did: but rather recognize that it was certainly not correct to do so. Cheers... Doc talk 23:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)#2 For more user links you can use Inka 888 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) by using the {{userlinks}} template. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 00:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

I will use the other template now that I have learned about it. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 01:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

RFA

Thanks for helping close the premature RFA. I left Core2012 a little longer message on his talk page. I didn't strike yours, just felt a little more might help. Dusti^*poke* 08:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok. That was better than what I left on his page. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 23:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

mail

Hello, Inka 888. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

intelati^talk 00:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Query

A quick query about your protection request. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 05:56, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, I responded below your comment. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 06:55, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Your RfA

Hello Inka 888, I'm sorry I just closed your RfA per WP:SNOW, because I don't think you'd have passed, at this time, given the rationales indicated by the opposers and wanted to spare you the bitter, stinging experience an Rfa can be; if you want your RfA to run for the entire week, however, you're of course entitled to revert my closure!
Please, remember you're a valuable Wikipedian and your contributions are much appreciated; do try again, when you have garnered a bit more experience and when you've tackled all the issue highlighted by the opposers. See you around! Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 11:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

I would of withdrew when I got back online. Thank you for closing. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 20:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Time limits on adminship

Hi I have proposed time limits on adminship. I'd appreciate your input! --Surturz (talk) 07:06, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 07:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: WikiCleaner

As far as I know, anyone can use it. --User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 08:53, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. Inka is in public (talk) 01:59, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Vandal fighting

Have I done enough vandal fighting or should I do more? WayneSlam 22:57, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

I would make 20 more reverts before requesting rollback. If you want I can make a request for you. Inka is in public (talk) 03:08, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

I'll let you make the request. I have made enough more reverts if you look at my contributions. WayneSlam 19:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

I requested it al Eagles247's talk page since he was the user who took away your rollback. Inka⁸⁸⁸ 05:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

I would need your help when I get rollback back. Will you help me? WayneSlam 17:08, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Small waterfall.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Small waterfall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell ^(talk) 17:29, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Inka 888/Archive 2! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Nomination of Mongo Wrestling Alliance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mongo Wrestling Alliance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongo Wrestling Alliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neelix (talk) 02:38, 11 September 2012 (UTC)