Hi, please do not remove the NPOV notice on the Either Or Argument page until the issue is resolved in a proper manner, according to Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you. – Mipadi July 2, 2005 18:26 (UTC)
Who the hell I think I am
editI am a contributor to this website who, after reading the article you created, believes it should be deleted. I am open to constructive challenging of other people's points of view, however I find the message you just left for me extremely offensive and a clear indication, when coupled with the evidence provided by your article edits, that you're not here for constructive discussion. Please do not contact me again unless you are able to be more polite. -- Francs2000 | Talk 
2 July 2005 19:13 (UTC)
Academic-type citations look nice -- but only if they actually support what is being claimed. If you want to be taken seriously, don't use easily checkable references that don't support -- not even slightly -- what you claim, as you did with the Matt Ridley Genome reference. That sort of thing is very easy to catch, especially now that Amazon allows searches inside many books. --Calton | Talk 3 July 2005 01:39 (UTC)
NPOV tags
editI see that you've applied some NPOV tags to articles. Our policy requires that editors who make that addition need to explain on the talk page of the article the specific reason for the tag. Unexplained tags may be removed without further comment. See Wikipedia:NPOV dispute. Thanks, -Willmcw July 4, 2005 21:16 (UTC)