User talk:InvalidOS/Archive 5

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Davey2010 in topic April Fools
Archive 1Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 10

20:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Mz7 (talk) 20:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

19:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

16:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

21:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Gab wiki page

I just went through the wiki page and I made some edits to remove the racist tone of the page.

I am a man of color too and there are so many other who use gab but calling it white supremacist extemist nazi website violate the basic principles of FOE as well as neutral point of view.

There are Facebook and Twitter pages full of Isis and islamic terrorist organisation White KKK type or Alt left communist so will you call them extremist and terror supporting am platform ? RuthlessKing16 (talk) 16:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

It doesn't violate NPOV, as it just discusses the fact that many people who use the website are part of the alt-right. InvalidOStalk 17:38, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

00:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

17:14, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

21:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

17:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

"U+1F614" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect U+1F614 should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 25#U+1F614 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 17:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

17:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2021

 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2021, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RealSanix (talk) 00:19, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

@RealSanix: Page was created via edit conflict. Software seems to behave weird when someone edits a page while it is moved. InvalidOStalk 00:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

@InvalidOS Apologies, this was merely meant to be part of th April Fools. I see why the 2020 version should have been deleted however. RealSanix (talk) 00:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

  Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/User:Xaosflux/Requests for adminship/Wikipe-tan, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/User:Xaosflux/Requests for adminship/Wikipe-tan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/WP:MFD/User:Xaosflux/Requests for adminship/Wikipe-tan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. One Blue Hat❯❯❯ (talk) 19:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

April Fools

Hi InvalidOS, Inre to this, If this were any other page I would've reverted and it would've stayed reverted however seeing as it was an April Fools page I sort of thought no one would've cared what the title was or even about the page itself,
I agree it's ridiculously long but I didn't want to start an edit war over something so stupid as that especially on an extremely stupid page!,
Just thought I should explain that, Thanks, Regards, –Davey2010Talk 12:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

@Davey2010: Well, the page is an archive now. It's meant to be an archive, after all. So, I think that the April Fools' page should be kept readable, and not cluttered, as that title made it. People looking at the page want to know about the pranks we pulled, not have to look at large headers. InvalidOStalk 13:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) agreed. Just leave it removed. The time for April Fool's Day jokes was two days ago, in any case.  — Amakuru (talk) 13:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
That is indeed very true, Just to clarify Amakuru I was never going to revert IOS, The "I would've reverted and it would've stayed reverted" was referring to my revert here. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:21, 3 April 2020 (UTC)