User talk:Invertzoo/Archive 67
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 60 | ← | Archive 65 | Archive 66 | Archive 67 | Archive 68 | Archive 69 | Archive 70 |
ARCHIVE PAGE 67: July 2013
Thank you for helping with this article! I hope, I would be able to translate other part of it... 11:30, 2 July 2013 89.113.149.82 (talk)
- Hi 89.113.149.82, Have you thought about getting an account here so you can have a user name? You are welcome. I had a hard time sometimes knowing what you were trying to say in that article. I hope I have not changed the meaning of anything you wrote. Best wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 13:11, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you one more time for helping with editing!
- I am sorry that it is hard to understand my words... Maybe you could let me know what exactly is not understandable and give me a chance to reformulate them.
- OK! One question: when you say "The Directorate staff drinks kefir with an enormous appetite, calculates with a broken adding machine, issues strange orders, and listens to the Director with personal telephones, through which everyone hears only words that were said personally to him but which still make no sense." do you mean the Directorate staff is many people? If so I will say "the people on the Directorate staff drink kefir..." etc.
- Yes, I mean that the Directorate staff consist of many people. I'll change the text as you say.
- Another question, when you say: "the future of the forest evolution is women, who think of men as being as good as goats, and to whom the forest serves." I don't understand what "to whom the forest serves" refers to? Does it mean the forest serves the women? And should we always say "the Forest" not "the forest"?
- Yes, the forest serves to the women. As for 'Forest' or 'forest', I don't think it is really important for in the novel authors says in both ways and there is no some other forest on the planet.
- And how do you think whether we may add this picture (http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1318433770l/1535134.jpg) as an illustration?
- Did you take the photo yourself? I will try to check and see if that is OK to upload. I would think so, but I am not sure, as I don't work on articles about books very often. Let me get back to you on that. Best wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 14:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- I've found the photo in the internet. I haven't this book to photo it...GiPreduuzie (talk) 06:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- Probably we can't use it, but let me ask someone else. Invertzoo (talk) 13:20, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- I've found the photo in the internet. I haven't this book to photo it...GiPreduuzie (talk) 06:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- Did you take the photo yourself? I will try to check and see if that is OK to upload. I would think so, but I am not sure, as I don't work on articles about books very often. Let me get back to you on that. Best wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 14:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- OK! One question: when you say "The Directorate staff drinks kefir with an enormous appetite, calculates with a broken adding machine, issues strange orders, and listens to the Director with personal telephones, through which everyone hears only words that were said personally to him but which still make no sense." do you mean the Directorate staff is many people? If so I will say "the people on the Directorate staff drink kefir..." etc.
The Signpost: 03 July 2013
- In the media: Jimmy Wales is not an Internet billionaire; a mass shooter's alleged Wikipedia editing
- Featured content: Queen of France
- WikiProject report: Puppies!
- News and notes: Wikipedia's medical collaborations gathering pace
- Discussion report: Snuggle, mainpage link to Wikinews, 3RR, and more
- Technology report: VisualEditor in midst of game-changing deployment series
- Traffic report: Yahoo! crushes the competition ... in Wikipedia views
- Arbitration report: Tea Party movement reopened, new AUSC appointments
My bad
No problem if we leave the link out. My fault for not looking closer.--Canoe1967 (talk) 02:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 July 2013
- WikiProject report: Not Jimbo: WikiProject Wales
- Traffic report: Inflated view counts here, there, and everywhere
- Dispatches: Infoboxes: time for a fresh look?
- Featured content: The week of the birds
- Discussion report: Featured article process governance, signature templates, and more
Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Bride Wore Black, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 July 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Square Enix
- Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation's new plans announced
- Featured content: Documents and sports
The Signpost: 24 July 2013
- In the media: Wikipedia flamewars
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Religion
- Discussion report: Partially disambiguated page names, page protection policy, and more
- Traffic report: Gleeless
- Featured content: Engineering and the arts
- Arbitration report: Infoboxes case opens
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Poul Lange, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page App (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 26 July 2013 (UTC)