Iphigenia Wang

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Iphigenia Wang/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 03:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Iphigenia Wang, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 03:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Iphigenia Wang/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem: User:Iphigenia Wang/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as User:Iphigenia Wang/sandbox, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This draft appears to contain material copied from the paper sources cited based on evidence listed at this page's entry at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2016 August 29, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at User talk:Iphigenia Wang/sandbox and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, User:Iphigenia Wang/sandbox, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on User talk:Iphigenia Wang/sandbox. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at User talk:Iphigenia Wang/sandbox with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at User talk:Iphigenia Wang/sandbox saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Sporran

Thanks for your additions to Sporran. Can I make a couple of suggestions?

• The section you added about The Sporran’s tradition in Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders Regiment doesn't have any sources. This might be taken as a suggestion that it is original research, which isn't permitted. Do you have any sources you could cite in the section?
• The section is quite big when compared to the rest of the article and quite specifically scoped. Do you think it might make a good article of its own? Then you could link to it from both Sporran and Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders. You'd still need to add cites, but I think it would be better like this. Unless you're planning in adding further sections to Sporran about other regiments?

Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 14:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Hi, Many thanks for your reply, but it seems I have put sources' name in the reference? Yes, you're right, I have many images of Sporrans in the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders. But I just a bit worried about, if this theme is enough notable to be independent article? Thx

Well it is very niche, but as long as you can include good sources I don't see why an article can't be written. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 14:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that in this edit to Sporran, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 14:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Hi, sorry for this , I didn't notice my mistake, I am just a beginner of Edition, have no experience about this issue, I will notice it at next time, many thanks to notice me about this issue!