IppolitoG

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:IppolitoG/Robin Monotti Graziadei has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin Monotti Graziadei, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 17:04, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin Monotti Graziadei. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! — CharlieEchoTango — 06:21, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

Hello! IppolitoG, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sarah (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin Monotti Graziadei concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin Monotti Graziadei, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robin Monotti Graziadei

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Medmyco (talk) 05:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Fails to meet notability criteria. Medmyco (talk) 05:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robin Monotti Graziadei (January 15)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin Monotti Graziadei.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! --Mdann52talk to me! 13:23, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin Monotti Graziadei concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin Monotti Graziadei, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin Monotti Graziadei concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin Monotti Graziadei, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin Monotti Graziadei

Hello IppolitoG. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Robin Monotti Graziadei".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robin Monotti Graziadei}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:00, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

October 2024

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you recently removed content from Robin Monotti Graziadei without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —C.Fred (talk) 11:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Robin Monotti Graziadei shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 11:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

• The only reason you are not blocked is that, in between your third and fourth reverts, I dug into the history of the social media section and realized there are some issues with sourcing. I went to remove the section myself and couldn't because you already had with your fourth revert. While WP:BLP can grant an exemption to 3RR, your case was not helped by the absence of edit summaries on your edits. When removing a section, it's a good idea to explain why. —C.Fred (talk) 11:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks for your message. Your edits are not neutral, and can be considered libellous. It is important to not apply personal judgments to public figures, like you are doing. Your reverts are grammatically incorrect from the first line, where you write, so please begin by checking that. Secondly, the use of the word disinformation is libellous and can expose you to legal consequences. IppolitoG (talk) 11:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

  For example, in your reverts you keep adding the word former to the first line, which instead reads like this:

  "Robin Monotti Graziadei is an Italian architect, film producer, biourbanist and water fountain designer based in London."

  There is no former which applies to any of the above. IppolitoG (talk) 11:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

  Baby with the bathwater. When you removed the entire social media section, that triggered a revert without going immediately going line by line through your edit.

  Also, please review WP:NLT. By throwing around the phrases "libel" and "legal consequences", you tread perilously close to crossing that line. —C.Fred (talk) 03:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

  I wrote the social media section, but it was being constantly abused by libellous edits by third parties, this was and is not a threat against you, but a statement of fact that that section was being continuously abused by not neutral editors with an axe to grind. Those same editors are now removing the main reason that page is on Wikipedia, being that the page is of an architect, and removing the word architect and therefore they, not me are engaged in an edit war. I am merely putting the word architect back in because that is why that person has an entry on wikipedia in the first place. IppolitoG (talk) 09:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

  By adding the word "architect" back, you are also party to the edit war, and your reverts are not subject to the BLP exemption from WP:3RR. —C.Fred (talk) 12:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

  what's the best course of action in these circumstances? The whole point of the page is that it's of a notable architect. 89.197.202.250 (talk) 13:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

  How do we stop these people removing the key aspect of this page? IppolitoG (talk) 15:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

  The best solution is to present more reliable sources at the talk page that refer to him as an architect. —C.Fred (talk) 00:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

  Thank you for your help, I have added the most reliable source possible on the Talk page. Not sure why this editor is not checking things before making such claims. IppolitoG (talk) 09:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)