IronFist666

Ways to improve Starlight Ritual

Hi, I'm JamesG5. IronFist666, thanks for creating Starlight Ritual!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs WP:CATEGORIES. Only source is a possibly self-edited Wiki, no reliable sources to establish WP:NOTABILITY. Could find almost nothing on this band, needs thorough sourcing to show it meets WP:GNG.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

JamesG5 (talk) 23:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Starlight Ritual

The article Starlight Ritual has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Shows no evidence of meeting WP:NMUSIC, if this can't be established in 7 days suggest deletion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesG5 (talk) 23:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Starlight Ritual

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Starlight Ritual requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lil Johnny (talk) (contribs) 00:14, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Re-making your page

Sorry your page got deleted, I was hoping me tagging it with a PROD would stave off a speedy delete & give you time to fix it but speedy deletes are pretty aggressive around here. If you put the page back up without solid sources, it'll likely happen again. What you might want to try is using the Articles for Creation system so experienced editors can review it and give advice BEFORE it's posted. Good luck! JamesG5 (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)