User talk:Ita140188/Archive 7
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ita140188. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
nucleare cina
Changjiang
ti segnalo che per la CNNC sono partiti tutti e due i reattori, mentre per WNA ne hanno iniziato solo uno, il secondo fra 10 mesi. --Dwalin (talk) 13:07, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Grazie! Ma dove le trovi queste info in Cinese?? --Ita140188 (talk) 01:25, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- è il sito ufficiale della CNNC. la versione inglese ha poco, ma se switci a quella cinese ci sono molte più info. poi se google translate non batte i ciocchi.......--Dwalin (talk) 09:36, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- hanno aggiornato il PRIS, solo che il reattore ha la stessa potenza degli altri 2 anche se è hualong one. aspetto un secondo per capire meglio la questione prima di modificare, intanto ti avvertivo--Dwalin (talk) 12:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- è il sito ufficiale della CNNC. la versione inglese ha poco, ma se switci a quella cinese ci sono molte più info. poi se google translate non batte i ciocchi.......--Dwalin (talk) 09:36, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
CAP1400
comparso sul PRIS, come il secondo e c'è anche xiapu-1. manca ancora il 2 e sapere praticamente tutto dei CAP1400, ma son comparsi. la data di inizio lavori è il 2013. --Dwalin (talk) 23:55, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- aggiornati i CAP, manca sempre Xiapu 2. --Dwalin (talk) 12:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Dwalin: Grazie! Ho aggiornato la lista di reattori. --Ita140188 (talk) 13:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- ti aggiorno e non lo faccio io così ci sono meno probabilità di dimenticanze varie nella compilazione, e così sai anche tu tutti gli aggiornamenti del caso e ne tieni memoria personale. --Dwalin (talk) 23:58, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Dwalin: Grazie! Ho aggiornato la lista di reattori. --Ita140188 (talk) 13:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
xiapu e proliferazione
ho trovato questo articolo. tu sai qualcosa in merito?--Dwalin (talk) 16:42, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- No, ma mi sembra speculazione mediatica, in ogni caso se la Cina volesse aumentare il proprio arsenale un modo lo trova, non credo sia un problema connesso specificamente con questa tecnologia. --Ita140188 (talk) 02:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- quello ovvio, ma è come sempre...mettere mezze cose vere e mezze bugie. non hanno messo i due xiapu, ma il riprocessamento del combustibile di xiapu non lo fai in un impianto militare, e quelli civili non esistono ancora. mentre per la normativa che impone di dire i tuoi stock di plutonio militare è la prima volta che ne sento parlare. --Dwalin (talk) 10:07, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
xudabao & tianwan
ciapa!--Dwalin (talk) 13:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- concernente questo.......tu hai capito come mai la cina ultimamente è restia ad aggiornare il PRIS? mancano 4 reattori (questi 2 + xiapu 2 + shidaoguan). --Dwalin (talk) 07:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Dwalin: Mah.. non ne ho idea. Non so neanche come funziona praticamente l'aggiornamento del database. Tu sai qualcosa a proposito? --Ita140188 (talk) 03:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- immagino che sia obbligatorio all'accensione e facoltativo alla costruzione, dato che all'accensione tutto diviene automaticamente rifiuto. ma sono mere supposizioni, nulla di più. --Dwalin (talk) 07:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Dwalin: Mah.. non ne ho idea. Non so neanche come funziona praticamente l'aggiornamento del database. Tu sai qualcosa a proposito? --Ita140188 (talk) 03:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Climate change on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Request for adding ref at Tesla, Inc.page.
Thanks for adding the source for the employees at Tilburg factory. I am not skilled enough to do that yet. I have another reference for the Semi production at Giga Nevada, if you want, please feel free to add it: https://insideevs.com/news/498003/tesla-semi-production-nevada-assembly-line/ Greetings from Germany, happy Easter and stay healthy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kasmopaya (talk • contribs) 19:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Kasmopaya: Thank you! You can check Help:Footnotes for more info on how to add citations yourself ;) --Ita140188 (talk) 04:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nuclear power
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nuclear power you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JackFromReedsburg -- JackFromReedsburg (talk) 17:40, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
I took {{overly detailed}} off after trimming and condensing the material contained, all of which struck me as reasonably significant and worthy of some kind of mention. The sole borderline one would be the unintentional power excess. Anyway, since you added th tag and noted you felt (multiple?) incidents should go, would you mind having a glance and seeing what you think? 92.24.246.11 (talk) 18:13, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, on further thought I've removed the power increase. 92.24.246.11 (talk) 18:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, it's much better now. --Ita140188 (talk) 02:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look :) 92.24.246.11 (talk) 13:25, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, it's much better now. --Ita140188 (talk) 02:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nuclear power
The article Nuclear power you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nuclear power for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JackFromReedsburg -- JackFromReedsburg (talk) 16:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SpaceX you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 64.121.103.144 -- 64.121.103.144 (talk) 18:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
The article SpaceX you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:SpaceX for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 13:41, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nuclear power
The article Nuclear power you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Nuclear power for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JackFromReedsburg -- JackFromReedsburg (talk) 01:41, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
Half Million Award for Nuclear power
|
The Half Million Award |
| For your contributions to bring Nuclear Power (estimated annual readership: 500,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 13:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks for improving this vital article! – Reidgreg (talk) 13:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Ita140188 (talk) 14:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane
Ciao @Ita140188: dato che sei stato così gentile la scorsa volta ho pensato di "approfittarne" di nuovo :)
Sempre a proposito dell'incidente ferroviario di Viareggio, ho trovato un'imprecisione che andrebbe corretta nella voce Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane. Si fa riferimento alla società come condannata durante il processo, ma come emerge anche dalla fonte presente FS Italiane è stata assolta già in primo grado. Ho proposto la modifica in discussione (qui), ma non avendo ancora ricevuto alcuna risposta mi chiedevo se potessi nuovamente aiutarmi. Grazie mille in anticipo :) --Claudia Frattini (talk) 07:36, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Claudia Frattini: Grazie per il messaggio. Purtroppo questi giorni non ho molto tempo per Wikipedia. Appena trovo tempo controllo le fonti ed in caso modifico la pagina. --Ita140188 (talk) 09:52, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 June 2021
- News and notes: Elections, Wikimania, masking and more
- In the media: Boris and Joe, reliability, love, and money
- Disinformation report: Croatian Wikipedia: capture and release
- Recent research: Feminist critique of Wikipedia's epistemology, Black Americans vastly underrepresented among editors, Wiki Workshop report
- Traffic report: So no one told you life was gonna be this way
- News from the WMF: Searching for Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: WikiProject on open proxies interview
- Forum: Is WMF fundraising abusive?
- Discussion report: Reliability of WikiLeaks discussed
- Obituary: SarahSV
The Signpost: 25 July 2021
- News and notes: Wikimania and a million other news stories
- Special report: Hardball in Hong Kong
- In the media: Larry is at it again
- Board of Trustees candidates: See the candidates
- Traffic report: Football, tennis and marveling at Loki
- News from the WMF: Uncapping our growth potential – interview with James Baldwin, Finance and Administration Department
- Humour: A little verse
Challenges_of_fossil_fuel_phase-out
The 465 EJ is difficult to understand, unless one shows how many of some fascility this corresponds to. this corresponds to 13k Hoover dams, based on some simple math. The reason it is difficult to decarbonize is problem size is large, and most efforts are small relative to problem size. I think the following is a good way to explain this yet am open to other ways to explain this:
The 465 EJ/yr refers to heat energy. If one converts heat to electricity via a 35% efficient turbine, for example, then this would correspond to 45,200 TWh/yr of electricity. To get a sense of size, one can divide this by energy generated from a known facility to see how many one would need to replace fossil fuels. For example, Hoover Dam generated 3.3 TWh in 2020; therefore, one would need 13,700 of these dams get 45K TWh (45,200/3.3).[1] Many decarbonisation initiatives are small relative to global energy consumption, which is perhaps the greatest challenge of fossil fuel phase-out.
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Abortion on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Solar power reassessment
Solar power has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 August 2021
- News and notes: Enough time left to vote! IP ban
- In the media: Vive la différence!
- Wikimedians of the year: Seven Wikimedians of the year
- Gallery: Our community in 20 graphs
- News from Wiki Education: Changing the face of Wikipedia
- Recent research: IP editors, inclusiveness and empathy, cyclones, and world heritage
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Days of the Year Interview
- Traffic report: Olympics, movies, and Afghanistan
- Community view: Making Olympic history on Wikipedia
Feedback request for SpaceX Starship
Hello, since you have written many Elon Musk's related topic, I think you might like reviewing SpaceX Starship for coverage and compehensiveness. This article is currently a , and currently undergoing a 
review, so if you can provide any comment to the normination, I would be extremely elated! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 01:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2021
- News and notes: New CEO, new board members, China bans
- In the media: The future of Wikipedia
- Op-Ed: I've been desysopped
- Disinformation report: Paid promotional paragraphs in German parliamentary pages
- Discussion report: Editors discuss Wikipedia's vetting process for administrators
- Recent research: Wikipedia images for machine learning; Experiment justifies Wikipedia's high search rankings
- Community view: Is writing Wikipedia like making a quilt?
- Traffic report: Kanye, Emma Raducanu and 9/11
- News from Diff: Welcome to the first grantees of the Knowledge Equity Fund
- WikiProject report: The Random and the Beautiful
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!
Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.
The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Braunschweig on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:DRASTIC on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Wind power
Wind power has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Golden Urn on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2021
- From the editor: Different stories, same place
- News and notes: The sockpuppet who ran for adminship and almost succeeded
- Discussion report: Editors brainstorm and propose changes to the Requests for adminship process
- Recent research: Welcome messages fail to improve newbie retention
- Community view: Reflections on the Chinese Wikipedia
- Traffic report: James Bond and the Giant Squid Game
- Technology report: Wikimedia Toolhub, winners of the Coolest Tool Award, and more
- Serendipity: How Wikipedia helped create a Serbian stamp
- Book review: Wikipedia and the Representation of Reality
- WikiProject report: Redirection
- Humour: A very Wiki crossword
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
Greetings,
It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.
Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:SpaceX Starship on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Merger discussion for Electricity generation
An article that you have been involved in editing—Electricity generation—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2021
- In the media: Denial: climate change, mass killings and pornography
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2021
- Deletion report: What we lost, what we gained
- From a Wikipedia reader: What's Matt Amodio?
- Arbitration report: ArbCom in 2021
- Discussion report: On the brink of change – RFA reforms appear imminent
- Technology report: What does it take to upload a file?
- WikiProject report: Interview with contributors to WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers
- Recent research: Vandalizing Wikipedia as rational behavior
- Humour: A very new very Wiki crossword
Geothermal energy
Geothermal energy has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Text formatting on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 December 2021
- From the editor: Here is the news
- News and notes: Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements
- Serendipity: Born three months before her brother?
- In the media: The past is not even past
- Arbitration report: A new crew for '22
- By the numbers: Four billion words and a few numbers
- Deletion report: We laughed, we cried, we closed as "no consensus"
- Gallery: Wikicommons presents: 2021
- Traffic report: Spider-Man, football and the departed
- Crossword: Another Wiki crossword for one and all
- Humour: Buying Wikipedia
Accusations is not the same as reality
Accusations is not the same as reality --2800:E2:1C80:35D:3DF0:20EA:C972:2472 (talk) 20:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Abortion on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cow Tools on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Symphony No. 3 (Beethoven) on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 January 2022
- Special report: WikiEd course leads to Twitter harassment
- News and notes: Feedback for Board of Trustees election
- Interview: CEO Maryana Iskander "four weeks in"
- Black History Month: What are you doing for Black History Month?
- WikiProject report: The Forgotten Featured
- Arbitration report: New arbitrators look at new case and antediluvian sanctions
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2021
- Obituary: Twofingered Typist
- Essay: The prime directive
- In the media: Fuzzy-headed government editing
- Recent research: Articles with higher quality ratings have fewer "knowledge gaps"
- Crossword: Cross swords with a crossword
Electric energy consumption
Hey, I saw that you recently edited the Electric energy consumption article and I wanted to see if you had any thoughts on how to best improve the article overall. I've been updating the data, but I wonder if there is anything else that should be done. JetGreen40 (talk) 00:36, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- @JetGreen40: thank you for your work on the article! At the moment I don't have much time, but as soon as I get some time I will check the article and see if I find something --Ita140188 (talk) 08:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sounds good, appreciate you taking the time. JetGreen40 (talk) 00:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Roberto González Echevarría on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
SpaceX industry revert
Hi, can you explain your revert, do you not seen the Wall Street Journal as a trustworthy source?Sanserio (talk) 15:58, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2022
- From the team: Selection of a new Signpost Editor-in-Chief
- News and notes: Impacts of Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Special report: A presidential candidate's team takes on Wikipedia
- In the media: Wiki-drama in the UK House of Commons
- Technology report: Community Wishlist Survey results
- WikiProject report: 10 years of tea
- Featured content: Featured Content returns
- Deletion report: The 10 most SHOCKING deletion discussions of February
- Recent research: How editors and readers may be emotionally affected by disasters and terrorist attacks
- Arbitration report: Parties remonstrate, arbs contemplate, skeptics coordinate
- Gallery: The vintage exhibit
- Traffic report: Euphoria, Pamela Anderson, lies and Netflix
- News from Diff: The Wikimania 2022 Core Organizing Team
- Crossword: A Crossword, featuring Featured Articles
- Humour: Notability of mailboxes
The Signpost: 27 March 2022
- From the Signpost team: How The Signpost is documenting the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
- News and notes: Of safety and anonymity
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Kharkiv, Ukraine: Countering Russian aggression with a camera
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Western Ukraine: Working with Wikipedia helps
- Disinformation report: The oligarchs' socks
- In the media: Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff
- Wikimedian perspective: My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond
- Discussion report: Athletes are less notable now
- Technology report: 2022 Wikimedia Hackathon
- Arbitration report: Skeptics given heavenly judgement, whirlwind of Discord drama begins to spin for tropical cyclone editors
- Traffic report: War, what is it good for?
- Deletion report: Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine
- From the archives: Burn, baby burn
- Essay: Yes, the sky is blue
- Tips and tricks: Become a keyboard ninja
- On the bright side: The bright side of news
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Video games on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 April 2022
- News and notes: Double trouble
- In the media: The battlegrounds outside and inside Wikipedia
- Special report: Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (Part 2)
- Technology report: 8-year-old attribution issues in Media Viewer
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content from March
- Interview: On a war and a map
- Serendipity: Wikipedia loves photographs, but hates photographers
- Traffic report: Justice Jackson, the Smiths, and an invasion
- News from the WMF: How Smart is the SMART Copyright Act?
- Humour: Really huge message boxes
- From the archives: Wales resigned WMF board chair in 2006 reorganization
The article SpaceX you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SpaceX for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jazzstinger -- Jazzstinger (talk) 11:20, 28 April 2022 (UTC)